Revision as of 23:31, 5 July 2017 edit24.39.22.2 (talk) →Statement← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:17, 26 August 2017 edit undo130.107.98.131 (talk) →StatementNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Statement == | == Statement == | ||
Let ρ be a density matrix acting on a Hilbert space <math>H_A</math> of finite dimension ''n''. Then it is possible to construct a second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> and a pure state <math>| \psi \rangle \in H_A \otimes H_B</math> such that the partial trace of <math>| \psi \rangle \langle \psi |</math> with respect to <math>H_B</math>. While the initial Hilbert space <math>H_A</math> might correspond to physically meaningful quantities, the second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> needn't have any physical interpretation whatsoever. However, in physics the process of state purification is assumed to be physical, and so the second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> should also correspond to a physical space, such as the environment. The exact form of <math>H_B</math> in such cases will depend on the problem, here is simply a proof of principle, showing that at very least <math>H_B</math> has to have dimensions greater than or equal to <math>H_A</math>. | Let ρ be a density matrix acting on a Hilbert space <math>H_A</math> of finite dimension ''n''. Then it is possible to construct a second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> and a pure state <math>| \psi \rangle \in H_A \otimes H_B</math> such that ρ is the partial trace of <math>| \psi \rangle \langle \psi |</math> with respect to <math>H_B</math>. While the initial Hilbert space <math>H_A</math> might correspond to physically meaningful quantities, the second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> needn't have any physical interpretation whatsoever. However, in physics the process of state purification is assumed to be physical, and so the second Hilbert space <math>H_B</math> should also correspond to a physical space, such as the environment. The exact form of <math>H_B</math> in such cases will depend on the problem, here is simply a proof of principle, showing that at very least <math>H_B</math> has to have dimensions greater than or equal to <math>H_A</math>. | ||
With these statements in mind, if, | With these statements in mind, if, |
Revision as of 00:17, 26 August 2017
In quantum mechanics, especially quantum information, purification refers to the fact that every mixed state acting on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces can be viewed as the reduced state of some pure state.
In purely linear algebraic terms, it can be viewed as a statement about positive-semidefinite matrices.
Statement
Let ρ be a density matrix acting on a Hilbert space of finite dimension n. Then it is possible to construct a second Hilbert space and a pure state such that ρ is the partial trace of with respect to . While the initial Hilbert space might correspond to physically meaningful quantities, the second Hilbert space needn't have any physical interpretation whatsoever. However, in physics the process of state purification is assumed to be physical, and so the second Hilbert space should also correspond to a physical space, such as the environment. The exact form of in such cases will depend on the problem, here is simply a proof of principle, showing that at very least has to have dimensions greater than or equal to .
With these statements in mind, if,
we say that purifies . Notice that we do not say it is *the* purification of because there may be many states that solve this equation.
Proof
A density matrix is by definition positive semidefinite. So ρ can be diagonalized and written as for some basis . Let be another copy of the n-dimensional Hilbert space with an orthonormal basis . Define by
Direct calculation gives
This proves the claim.
Note
- The vectorial pure state is in the form specified by the Schmidt decomposition.
- Since square root decompositions of a positive semidefinite matrix are not unique, neither are purifications.
- In linear algebraic terms, a square matrix is positive semidefinite if and only if it can be purified in the above sense. The if part of the implication follows immediately from the fact that the partial trace of a positive map remains a positive map.
An application: Stinespring's theorem
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) |
By combining Choi's theorem on completely positive maps and purification of a mixed state, we can recover the Stinespring dilation theorem for the finite-dimensional case.
Categories: