Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:44, 27 August 2017

Illegal immigration to the United States

Can you point me where on the Illegal immigration to the United States talk page there is a consensus on the material you reverted? Natureium (talk) 14:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

The changes were made here on August 6th without consensus or discussion. I reverted them. You then jumped in and started edit warring to restore text which did not have consensus for inclusion.Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

That's not what your edit summary stated. "no, this was actually the consensus version" There was no consensus, so why is your version the correct one? The change on August 6 was made by Neel.arunabh, you reverted it without any explanation, Neel.arunabh added it again, you reverted it again without any discussion on the talk page, I then readded it because you removed it with no explanation, and you then reverted it a third time. Please explain how I am the one edit warring, and why you object to the improvements to the article. Natureium (talk) 14:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Ugh. The changes were made without consensus or discussion. They were reverted. If you want to make those changes, it's up to you to get consensus for them.Volunteer Marek (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!.Keith Johnston (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC) ==

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!.Keith Johnston (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

RT America

Hello VM, I have undone the edits you made HERE. The basis is that your edit actions there ("restored sourced content") completely ignores WP:ONUS. Let me explain, while information must be sourced in order to be included in an article, this does not mean that all verifiable information must be included in an article. In this case, this article is specifically about RT America, and not about the global RT network. The sourced information you restored is not about the subject of this article but about the entire RT network and, as such, does not belong in this article. It belongs in RT (network), which exists for information about the entire RT network.

If you disagree with these observations, no problem, disagreements do occur. In that case, let me know by way of a reply here and I will start a dispute resolution thread via the established Misplaced Pages dispute resolution process.

BTW, unrelated to WP:ONUS, included in your restore, you also re-introduced other changes (such as the word "claim") which are frowned upon under Misplaced Pages policies, guidelines, or the MOS, and I have also undone those as well to maintain the encyclopedic quality of the article.

Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 15:34, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello

I have a few thoughts that I 'd like to run past you, arising out of our interaction at the List of Confederate Monuments, but it is a bit rambling so I'd just as soon do it in email until, maybe, we decide to bring it back to wikipedia. Could you please send me an email to carptrash at gmail dot com, put Conffederate list or even Union cause list in the subject and then remove this - or at least the address part? If not, I'll plop the epistle I am working on here in a day or two. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

@Carptrash: - you can use the "Email this user" link on the side (right below "User contributions" and "Logs").Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Well I didn't find it (is it off your user page or your talk page?) and now is my time to volunteer at the local library, so I shall try later. Thanks for getting back to me. Carptrash (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Sebastian Gorka

Dear VolunteerMarek! There is an open debate on the bio of Mr Gorka. Feel free to join in. --Ltbuni (talk) 21:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

With Regards To Zero Hedge

Let's look to resolve things here. Honestly, I think my revisions seems reasonable. I felt that the issue needs to be made neutral for the sake of data's clarity. The language used may be seen as biased, and can make people easily assume based on such statements.

Antifa tag

My bad. I added it, discussed it and it was dealt with, but I forgot to remove the t. Doug Weller talk 19:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Yeah I was confused. No problem.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Ha ha

Morty's gonna get banned and you'll be next.