Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:32, 5 October 2006 editJersyko (talk | contribs)14,671 edits new problem at Sons of Confederate Veterans← Previous edit Revision as of 23:57, 5 October 2006 edit undoShotwell (talk | contribs)3,697 edits Advocates for Children in TherapyNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}} {{RFCheader|Society, law, and sex}}
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>-->
*] Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
*] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC) *] does recently added subsection adhere to ] and ]? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
*] - This article documents, in chronological order, occurrences involved in a controversy surrounding the ] and a proposed move by that school to Florida. The controversy page is roughly double the length of the main article; one editor has questioned the encyclopedic value of the controversy fork and suggested that salient points be merged into the main article, with some support. Others have stated they feel this fork is encyclopedic and important, and wish the timeline page to stay where it is. Outside views are requested to gain more consensus. 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC) *] - This article documents, in chronological order, occurrences involved in a controversy surrounding the ] and a proposed move by that school to Florida. The controversy page is roughly double the length of the main article; one editor has questioned the encyclopedic value of the controversy fork and suggested that salient points be merged into the main article, with some support. Others have stated they feel this fork is encyclopedic and important, and wish the timeline page to stay where it is. Outside views are requested to gain more consensus. 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:57, 5 October 2006

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • Talk:Advocates for Children in Therapy Does this article use irrelevant facts and unverified claims to subtly discredit this organization? Do the citations in this article support the claims they are intended to support? 23:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Sons of Confederate Veterans#Factionalization does this recently added subsection adhere to WP:NPOV and WP:RS? 19:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Timeline of Controversy at Ave Maria School of Law - This article documents, in chronological order, occurrences involved in a controversy surrounding the Ave Maria School of Law and a proposed move by that school to Florida. The controversy page is roughly double the length of the main article; one editor has questioned the encyclopedic value of the controversy fork and suggested that salient points be merged into the main article, with some support. Others have stated they feel this fork is encyclopedic and important, and wish the timeline page to stay where it is. Outside views are requested to gain more consensus. 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Frot#RfC2 dispute over section Frot in Construction of Masculine Gay Identity, use or , its also been suggested that we move first sentence and delete last paragraph (of shorter version, found in the middle of longer version) 128.192.81.40 17:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Kickball#Repeated blatant vandalism Repeated vandalism against a sports league being mentioned in an article about that sport. Removing valid factual content, adding spam, making slanderous comments, using article to promote a business, and worst of all constantly undoing reverts without explanation. Need help. 17:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Jeff Gannon Should Category:Courtesans and prostitutes be added to an article about a man who advertised himself as a prostitute on the Internet? 17:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)correction by another editor - The advertisement was for an "escort" not a "prostitute". 18:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Hippie, lack of sources, original research, lack of discussion (and unwillingness to discuss) prior to complete reorganization and removal of content, formatting and structure of lead section, and WP:OWN present issues that need to be solved before article can be submitted to peer review. 11:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Perverted-Justice.com#Official Request For Comment, dispute over whether to include the founder's name change in the lead of the article. 20:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:American people, dispute over name of the article 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Police_brutality#Request_for_Comment Needs input desperately. Help getting consensus is needed, especially as there has now been an accusation of "vandalism" for good faith work on this article. 16:47, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Alpha Phi Alpha#Stop this edit war An extremely messy edit war conducted by three users. As I don't have the slightest idea whose version is correct, I've opened up this RfC. 16:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Criticism_of_the_clothes_free_movement External web site reference is under dispute. One user says that it is unbalanced POV and does not meet Misplaced Pages standards for WP:EL based on WP:NOR and WP:Reliable. Other user claims link is important ti integrity of article. Please give your opinion. 22:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Advocates_for_Children_in_Therapy#RFC over deleting and abuse of admin status 17:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Category talk:Chinese universities – over the scope of the category. 20:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Lion: Lion same-sex relations - Should zoological studies discussing frequent homosexual interactions among male and female lion pairs be included in the article? Should the person contributing the material be charged with finding opposing viewpoints? 04:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Template talk:Police by country – Should the links to the police articles of Hong Kong and Macao be included in brackets after the one of the People's Republic of China, or in the same way as other countries. 21:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Argentine National Gendarmerie - Disagreement about whether an article on an Argentine organisation should give preference to the Spanish terms with English terms added after, or whether preference should go to the English terms, with Spanish terms added after. Also whether a translation is legitimate if it appears in no Spanish-English dictionary, rather than a translation which appears in Spanish-English dictionaries. 21:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:YouTube#Request_for_Comment:_Section_with_information_on_how_to_download_videos_from_YouTube - A dispute over if there should be information included on the main page about how to download videos from YouTube, or at least reference sites that allow this, or if that constitutes a 'How-To'/copyright/legal violation --16:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:Kenny Dalglish#2004 Rooney Court Case - a dispute over the notability of a court case involving Kenny Dalglish. Does it merit inclusion in the lead section or not? Was Dalglish's involvement proven, alleged, or anything in-between? 01:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Talk:English people. Dispute on whether Bretons, Danes, Dutch and Frisians should be added to the list of related people. 20:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)