Misplaced Pages

User talk:Elisa.rolle: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:10, 4 September 2017 editDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 05:38, 4 September 2017 edit undoDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 editsm Undid revision 798848591 by Dr.K. (talk) ALT1 was approved. Point is mootNext edit →
Line 495: Line 495:
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''', known as the "Skyscraper Girl", was the United States' first woman glider pilot?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''', known as the "Skyscraper Girl", was the United States' first woman glider pilot?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and it may be added to ] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC) }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

==DYK nomination of James Amster==
] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath ''']''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] ] 05:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:38, 4 September 2017

Archiving icon
Archives (index)
Index
Archive 1Archive 2


A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Nice job today with the List of landmarks in the New Orleans French Quarter article! Congratulations. –CaroleHenson (talk) 00:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for photographing Chantry House, Steyning and adding it to two articles. Edwardx (talk) 16:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Progetto WikiDonne

Ciao. Ti segnalo il progetto WikiDonne in itwiki (la variante italiana di WikiWomen), dove mi farebbe immenso piacere averti con noi. Molto spesso traduciamo voci dall'inglese, e avere qualcuno che lo parla molto meglio di noi sarebbe di grande aiuto, visto l'immenso lavoro che c'è fa fare. Potrebbe succedere anche il contrario, per esempio, che siano punti di partenza le nostre voci. In uno degli editathon comuni, una nostra collega di WikiWomen in Red aveva tradotto la voce scritta in itwiki della biologa e fisiologa Lidia Mannuzzu (tradotta poi anche in catalano), cancellata in seguito perché l'autrice è stata bloccata. Devo dire che mi stupisce parecchio questo fatto, come se le voci avessero a che fare con le utenze, fossero legate in qualche modo. Se ti fa piacere potresti iniziare da qui. Grazie ;-), --Camelia (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Camelia, Grazie, se devo essere sincera, mi trovo meglio a scrivere in inglese e non sono una brava traduttrice. Non me la sentirei di iniziare un articolo da zero in italiano, ma se c'è qualcosa da tradurre non troppo complicato sono a disposizione. Quando dico non troppo complicato è perchè non ho studiato da traduttrice e neanche lingue/lettere (sono laureata in economia) di conseguenza non mi sento in grado di tradurre qualcosa di molto letterario, non farei un buon lavoro. Per quanto riguarda gli accounts, come hai notato, ci sono seri problemi qui in Misplaced Pages, ma ho promesso di essere positiva e di non guardare le cose brutte (come utenti che ad un gentile commento rispondono con la parola "f..k" ad una donna... e poi quando glielo faccio notare, dicono agli altri che è troppo stressante lavorare con me...) Ma c'è un link che posso navigare per vedere cosa c'è da fare?--Elisa.rolle (talk) 10:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your efforts to be positive are very much appreciated! (I read Italian much better than I speak and write it.)–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
La voci da scrivere ex novo sono più difficili perché presuppongono un grande lavoro, dalla ricerca delle fonti fino alla parte finale, per questo spesso traduciamo. Ma spesso arricchiamo anche o correggiamo le inesattezze delle versioni in altre lingue. Insomma c'è un grande lavoro di contaminazione tra le edizioni, visto anche la nostra partecipazione al progetto globale Women in red. Qui e qui sono le voci mancanti, ne troverai parecchie. Mensilmente organizziamo editathon online (anche 2-3 al mese) insieme alle WiR: questo mese women in dance, women in music, women from India. pulsanti in altro al progetto, anche sulle singole pagine ci sono voci proposte. Grazie, --Camelia (talk) 11:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Camelia, ma posso tradurre un articolo dall'inglese in italiano? che referenze devo dare? per esempio sarei interessata ad Anne Fausto Sterling, che è la compagna di Paula Vogel... --Elisa.rolle (talk) 21:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Reminders

You've been doing a great job on the recent articles. I think that I have been running across some issues that came up from your initial drafts of the articles and so I created the following checklist of the types of things that have come up. This doesn't mean that all of these are issues right now, but is hopefully a good list of reminders. There's so much to learn, I hope this helps!

Moved to User:Elisa.rolle/References. Alex Shih 04:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Writing better articles and Article development are excellent references.

Some pointers, starting with the most important four, are:

  1. Notability The subject of the article must be notable.
  2. Reliable Sources - Reliable sources must be used,generally meaning published works that have gone through an editorial process.
    1. Books are great, unless self-published -- which speaks to the editorial process -- with newer books being better than older books, if there's a choice. Magazine and newspaper articles are also great - because they have gone through an editorial process. To check websites, or online media, check the "About" or other areas to see if there is an editorial process and/or the writers would be considered experts, e.g., historians with published books, etc. Side note: Genealogy books can be problematic and should generally be avoided unless from a respected source, like Burke's Peerage.
    2. Sources that should not be used include user-generated content, such as that comes from personal websites or sites that take contributions from users like imdb.com and Find a Grave. Personal genealogy websites are particularly problematic and prone to error and should never be used.
  3. Paraphrasing - Content should be paraphrased. See close paraphrasing about how to paraphrase content. I also posted a message here with examples in this diff.
  4. Verifiable - Sources should be WP:Verifiable, which means that google book diffs are not considered reliable sources, because not all of the content can be viewed within context to ascertain the full meaning of the information. Providing links to sources is very helpful with verifiability. Formatting citations properly helps with verifiability and so that readers have a better understanding of the sources.
  5. Citation format - There are various citation formats, but the best way to ensure that citations are properly formatted are to use citation templates. You can also use tools, like ProveIt, that will create citation templates (I find it a little cludgey though for editing citations). Reftag is a tool to format google books, but the user should double-check that key information is complete - particularly with older books it seems.
  6. Citation content - Citations should contain basic information: title, publisher, date. If the author is known, the author. Applicable urls with the accessdate should be included.
  7. Sections - Sections help break-up and organize the content.
  8. Section headings - Just capitalize the first letter of the heading, unless it is a proper noun. So, "Early life" rather than "Early Life".
  9. Content - Article content should be encyclopedic. See What Misplaced Pages is not. It should not contain genealogical content or extraneous detail about someone's life.
  10. Encyclopedic style - Content should be written in an Encyclopedic style, concepts including summarization and brevity.
  11. Punctuation goes before the citations, per WP:PAIC.
  12. Citation order Kind of nit-picky, but if there are multiple citations for a sentence or group of sentences, they should be in numerical order (, not )
  13. Content covered by citations - It is assumed that all the information between one citation or set of citations and the next citation is covered by the ending citation. Every time that there is new content, there should be a source. If there is no reliable source for the information, it should not be included, or it would be considered WP:Original research.
Alex Shih or anyone else with ideas, do you see anything you would change, delete or add?–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Please feel free to make direct edits.–CaroleHenson (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Added the last item.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Can I move this to a {{essay}} under subpage? Alex Shih 03:54, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Sure.–CaroleHenson (talk) 04:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Grace Hutchins

On 27 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grace Hutchins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grace Hutchins promoted a radical Christian pacifist movement in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Hutchins. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Grace Hutchins), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Precious

historic lesbian women

Thank you for quality articles such as Grace Hutchins and Clementina Anstruther-Thomson, performed in collaboration, for good illustrations conveying moods, for not giving up in frustration but trying again, - Elisa, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hey Gerda, thank you for your DYK review on Clementina Anstruther-Thomson. I will respond to them soon, thanks again as always. Alex Shih 09:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt and Alex Shih, thank you to both of you for encouragement. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 10:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Ben Zuckerman

Hi Elisa! I was absolutely surprised to discover you had started an article on Ben Zuckerman - he had been on my to-do list for ages, but I didn't expect you to be the one to create the article! I am now really intrigued, hope you'll forgive my being nosey but could I ask how you lighted upon Zuckerman as an article subject? Mabalu (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Mabalu, he is on my book of long-term relationships for his partnership in work and life with Shactner, but you are more than welcome to improve the article.--Elisa.rolle (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Katharine Peabody Loring

Hello! Your submission of Katharine Peabody Loring at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Elisa.rolle: Sorry I had to revert the information you added in the article, because they are extraneous details that does not contribute to the notability of Katharine. As the reviewer pointed out, there needs to be more information about her outside of Alice James and Louisa, presumably focusing on Katharine's work as educator and post-Alice James activities. I could not find much information about those areas when I was doing the research, but if you have any information on those areas it would be nice. Thanks! Alex Shih 21:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Alex Shih: I think I found many info on Katharine Loring's background other than Alice James. Please have a look, more than this I'm not sure is available.--Elisa.rolle (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I will copyedit the additions later, hopefully it will be Main Page bound soon too. Alex Shih 23:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Elisa.rolle: Please refer to the subject by her surname on the second and subsequent mentions, per WP:SURNAME. It's also degrading to women to call her by her first name throughout the article. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
@Yoninah: Sorry, I was the one that did that per MOS:SAMESURNAME and the sources, I am not sure if degradation is relevant, thanks. But I agree the usage should be limited. Alex Shih 04:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you've been improving the article. When you think your DYK nomination is ready for re-review, please let me know on the DYK template. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 18:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Asking for help vs Canvassing (defining the thing) :)

Hi Elisa! I just wanted to make sure that you know it's always OK to ask for help when working on an article. Asking for a copyedit or reference help is always a good thing to do on Misplaced Pages. We even have a Guild of Copy Editors that you may want to look at.

People accuse others of canvassing when they ask too broadly for help when an article is being discussed for some reason, like at AfD. In this case, you can still always let someone know about it, but the best way to alert people in a neutral way is to post that it's up for discussion or deletion on a relevant WikiProject talk page like WiR instead of on individual editor pages.

Figuring out what's canvassing or not is tough, but I don't want you to get stuck in that again. At the same time, I don't want you to be afraid to ask for help. We're here to do that. You're doing great and I'm glad to see your new articles. Keep it up! :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Megalibrarygirl: If I could gently object to the word 'accuse'...? — fortunavelut luna 12:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, you're right. I should have cautioned against the appearance of canvassing instead of implying accusations. Also please understand I didn't mean to implicate you in this: you were trying to help. There have been other issues I was thinking of when I wrote this. I was trying to help here, too and didn't express myself clearly. Please accept my apology. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Please let me know if you are in any kind of trouble. I see your user page has been blanked. In any case, I'm please to see you have become a member of Women in Red. We have some exciting new developments for August - see below.--Ipigott (talk) 09:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Megalibrarygirl and Ipigott, thank you. May I ask something? I have an AfD on Lillie Rose Ernst (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lillie_Rose_Ernst) that I'm sure it was a mistake of the nominator, as well explained by Timothyjosephwood, he did not have the time to analyze the sources to take such decision. 4 opinion other than mine are for Keep, noone is supporting the AfD proposal. One editor asked the nominator to withdraw his proposal, but he has not reply nor in positive nor in negative. How long we have to wait to close the topic? Who can remove the tag other than the nominator?--Elisa.rolle (talk) 12:09, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Normally AfDs run for a week, sometimes longer if there is no clear consensus, and sometime shorter if the nomination is withdrawn, if it is closed as speedy keep, and in some other circumstances. The AfD tag on the article is normally removed by a person who formally closes a discussion, who is supposed to be an experienced editor who is uninvolved in the discussion they're closing. While it is often seen as good form, there is no explicit requirement that the nominator withdraw the nomination in cases where the consensus clearly seems to be against them, whether they maintain their opinion that the article should be deleted, or whether they are simply inactive at the moment.
Overall, I wouldn't be too concerned if I were you. At the end of the day, AfD doesn't just establish a consensus for deletion, but it may also establish a strong consensus that the article should be kept, and this has a protective effect, since renominating an article which had a strong consensus to be kept can be seen as disruptive. TimothyJosephWood 12:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
If I were you, Elisa, I wouldn't be too concerned about when the tag is removed. The important thing is that the article will remain on the main space. I realize it is not very pleasant to have one of the articles you have created tagged in this way but this sort of thing happens quite frequently on Misplaced Pages. My advice is to take advantage of the discussion to improve on the drafting and sourcing of your future articles. Keep smiling and keep surprising us with interesting new articles.--Ipigott (talk) 14:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm glad to see that the discussion has been closed and the article has been kept.--Ipigott (talk) 14:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons.


(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

A new WiR initiative starting in August

Introducing...
WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage
Facilitated by Women in Red
  • Create articles on any day of any month
  • Cover women and their works in any field of interest
  • Feel free to add articles in other languages too

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 09:08, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Source

Just FYI, but if you search the Missouri History Museum's online collection for The Potter's Wheel, it looks like they have much of the publication available online, and since it was published prior to 1923, much or all of it could potentially be uploaded to Commons if it's useful, and of course could be used and quoted as much as is useful on Misplaced Pages. TimothyJosephWood 15:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Timothyjosephwood, thank you. Yes, I red-linked all the Potters, cause other than Teasdale, and now Ernst, they are all missing in Misplaced Pages. I think the next right candidates to have a page are the Parrish Sisters, their photos have been exhibited widely and they are now at the Library of Congress (but not digitalized...) --Elisa.rolle (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I'm going to ping User:Fæ to this discussion, since they're a Commons wizard, and may know a way to upload this content using semi-automation. TimothyJosephWood 19:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Timothyjosephwood, I have uploaded some, but just some photos I will need for the profiles. All the art work I did not upload and there are more than 800 records. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
If anyone can figure it out it's Fae. They've uploaded so many images that it breaks the tool that measures how many images someone has uploaded. Otherwise, I have two other projects that I need to finish, but I'll try to help out. TimothyJosephWood 20:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

I've left a note to myself on my Commons page to look at it. May take a while. The archives look messy for copyright, as in this example some of the documents state the work is copyrighted when they are obviously public domain under U.S. law. I also have to take time to review the site terms, just in case they want to prosecute anyone doing systematic downloading. BTW, I am a big project person. I normally want to reserve my time for several thousand sized upload projects; this may or may not end up being that size. -- (talk) 20:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

, Yes, I noticed it, and that is the reason why I took just some, basically photo of the Potters, considering photos are for sure covered by Public Domain if before 1923. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Just in case you're interested and haven't seen it already, there is apparently a site here that has really high quality scans of the Potters Wheel. Unfortunately, they're high quality enough that they pretty much immediately crash my browser if I try to download them. I managed to get two, but had to then resort to uploading the lower quality scans at the MO Hist Museum. TimothyJosephWood 18:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Timothyjosephwood, yes, that is the website where I found some bio info of the Potters.--Elisa.rolle (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
I'll probably try again on a different computer this evening. Also... I'm seriously tempted to print off some of this stuff and frame it. TimothyJosephWood 18:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Timothyjosephwood, LOL, I will be remembered like the one who made you fall in love with 10 girls from the 1900s... --Elisa.rolle (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Uploads started with c:File:The Potter's Wheel, Volume 2, Number 8, page 22, June 1906.jpg. Hopefully this will finish overnight as I'm away for a few days, so if it gets stuck it may have to wait until next week. Further sub-categorization on Commons would be sensible when it looks complete. BTW, these are original scan sizes, and so should be a great deal larger than some pre-existing versions in the main category c:Category:The Potter's Wheel, so old versions may be worth deleting using c:template:duplicate. At the original size, they may be a good to create derivative crops from, if any are needed. I suspect they are the same size as the versions from Yale, but that's something to investigate later.

It's worth highlighting the example of File:The Potter's Wheel, Volume 2, Number 9, page 32, July 1906.png (950 × 590 pixels) which can now be superseded with File:The Potter's Wheel, Volume 2, Number 9, page 32, July 1906.jpg (5,719 × 7,182 pixels) though the extracted crop will need redoing. Thanks -- (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Well , I uh... You kindof seemed like you had other irons in the fire, so I started manually uploading. Looks like the most I've done is make a mess that needs cleaned up. TimothyJosephWood 22:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I thought it was going to be rather more work, but I managed to skip having to use cookies. No hurry to do the housekeeping. I've made huge messes in the past and it's always better to have a go rather than never get to it. So long as the MHM does not redesign too much, the way I'm doing this can be reused to upload other stuff at some point. -- (talk) 22:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

You may be interested that I have generalized the script I was using, and kicked off a batch upload of everything before 1923. The results are building up at c:Category:Collections of the Missouri History Museum. There's lots of interest, including many historical records relating to the Civil War and emancipation in the United States. Thanks -- (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
For tireless contributions to biographies of often overlooked figures. Alex Shih 02:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nice to see that you are nominating articles for DYK too. The number of nominations for biographies have been low recently, so if some of these can get approved it would be great help. Regards, Alex Shih 02:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

A few more tips on women's biographies

Hi Elisa. I see you are continuing to make progress on the EN wiki and you seem to be learning quickly from the advice you have received. I think I've now been through most of the interesting articles you have written in connection with Women in Red. May I suggest you add the template {{Authority control}} to all your biographies. In many cases, it will turn up links on the variants to the person's name and to the works created, etc. I have been adding it to the articles you have created up to now -- so you don't need to go back over them. Similarly, you should add {{DEFAULTSORT:}} in order to ensure the article appears correctly in lists of categories, etc. In most cases, the family name should come first and the given names afterwards. An article on Elisa Rolle would then appear as {{DEFAULTSORT:Rolle, Elisa}}. You'll find DEFAULTSORT under Wiki markup at the bottom of the pages you create or edit. If you click on it, it will appear in the article at the point where your cursor is placed. I realize that as a native Italian speaker, you still experience a few difficulties with English. It might be useful for your to look through some of the copy edits to your articles in order to try to avoid systematic errors. There are not too many but some appear quite frequently. I also recommend you look at SusunW's guidelines on Misplaced Pages:Creating biographies on women. I've also seen that in some cases you had used more than one WIR template on the talk pages of your articles. In most cases, just one template is sufficient unless you are writing articles which happen to cover more than one of our current editathons, for example one on an indigenous woman who is also Canadian. If you need any further help, please let me know.

And by the way, if you feel like "translating" or recreating articles from the IT wiki, you will find many interesting women listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality/Italy. I would however advise you to try to find links to sources for each paragraph as the EN wiki tends to be stricter than the Italian version. If you would like to give it a try, I can try to help you along.--Ipigott (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Amabel Anderson Arnold

Hello! Your submission of Amabel Anderson Arnold at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: Bruce Cratsley

I think they looks fine now too, {{GFDL}} solves many problems. The system automatically tags images for deletion if you use non-free copyrights template without a permission template. Another great work by the way. Alex Shih 23:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Alex Shih, thank you. And since I did find a solution for this one alone ;-) may I bother you with something else? my article for Christian William Miller, that I think was a long due given the interest characters he was, was tagged for deletion on the account the statement "he was the most beautiful man" was unsourced (who tagged it said "say who?"). Of course it wasn't unsourced, it's actually in a book by Kaiser who is a Gay Historian of well-known fame and the source was in the article. Then they changed position saying he wasn't an artist worth of notability, and again I proved them wrong, giving evidences. The only opinion is for a Keep, to which someone contested the connection with Kinsey, a connection that is even in the biography of the same Kinsey, and supported by Papers held at Yale University... to close the point, I think there is enough for notability and for the article to remain. It's more than 5 days an no one supported the deletion. May I do something more? just wait? https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Christian_William_Miller --Elisa.rolle (talk) 00:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
I saw the nomination. Articles for deletion discussions are usually listed for 7 days, unless if there is a clear consensus early on. Usually after that someone will close the discussion, in this case if no one else does I will so yeah, maybe wait. Couple points though:
  • Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Words to watch, extraordinary claims should be avoided even if it's sourced (instead of "...the most", "one of the most" is probably better)
  • Is it okay to use * (like here) to present your comments in easier readable bullet forms? Perhaps maybe write shorter too since the longer you write, the less likely people are going to read (unfortunately). It's also nice to use {{tq}} to change the color of the text when you are referencing a source material, this makes it easier to read too. Regards, Alex Shih 00:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Barbara May Cameron

Hello! Your submission of Barbara May Cameron at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 18:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Adeline Palmier Wagoner

You asked about her birth date. My guess is she is this one but I cannot prove that and there was another Adeline Wagoner from St. Louis born in a similar time frame. Your Adeline lied about her age. On the 1910 census she was 35, i.e. born 1875 . While possible, if she was married for 20 years, she married at 15 and her mother (born 1837 gave birth to her at 38). Looks like she was enumerated twice in 1920, on 6th January with her husband, both were age 54, i.e. born 1866 and three days later at her son's house age 52, born 1868 . I find no census records for her parents at all, which is weird. There is a lengthy obit at newspapers.com, but I cannot access it yet. My request for extra publishing hasn't yet gone through. SusunW (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Hmmm, I am like 100% sure that this, i.e. Bessie (Elizabeth?) was her sister Her husband Walter S. Dray's will names "Addie Wagoner", his wife's sister, and his son Walter R. Though Find-a-grave is not a reliable source, Walter Remy's entry links to Bessie M. As this says Adeline is younger than Mrs. Dray, so 1860s dates seem more likely. SusunW (talk) 21:40, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
yes, I think the 1868 is the good one... these women, always the same, aren't they?--Elisa.rolle (talk) 21:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Clementina Anstruther-Thomson

On 6 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Clementina Anstruther-Thomson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Clementina Anstruther-Thomson and Vernon Lee openly lived together as a lesbian couple during the Victorian era? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Clementina Anstruther-Thomson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Clementina Anstruther-Thomson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Adele Schulenburg Gleeson

Hello! Your submission of Adele Schulenburg Gleeson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Women in Red barnstar
A well-earned barnstar for all the articles, photographs and DYKs you have created on women's biographies since you joined WiR on 29 July. Truly impressive work for a newcomer ro Misplaced Pages.--Ipigott (talk) 08:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Berenice Wyer

(SusunW, help in finding birth and death date? :-) --Elisa.rolle (talk) 11:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Okay, birth date found with parent's names. Death date as yet elusive. This shows they stayed in St. Louis until 1920. This shows they had moved to Massachusetts by 1930 and she was still performing , . They seem to have stayed in Brookline, Massachusetts. This shows, as least the major was still living there in 1948. SusunW (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Major died in 1961, I found the obituary in an "Harvard Alumni Bulletin, Volume 63", but I could not read it all.--Elisa.rolle (talk) 16:20, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
That lets us know she died before him SusunW (talk) 16:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Daisy E. Nirdlinger template

Fixed. You can put it back in the nominations now. — Maile (talk) 13:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Nice job writing Adeline Palmier Wagoner! Happy to see this on the main page soon. MX () 16:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alma Lutz

Hello! Your submission of Alma Lutz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi Elisa.rolle, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Alex Shih 05:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Katharine Peabody Loring

On 13 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Katharine Peabody Loring, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Katharine Peabody Loring taught history with Alice James at the first correspondence school in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Katharine Peabody Loring. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Katharine Peabody Loring), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Reviews at DYK

Elisa.rolle, I was pleased to note that you have been nominating many articles for Did You Know of late. Before this, articles you worked on were nominated by other people, but these recent ones have been your own nominations.

DYK has a requirement called QPQ, or the Quid Pro Quo review. Basically, it means that for each DYK nomination you make, you are required to do a full review of a DYK nomination by someone else. The review involves checking to make sure the nomination was made soon enough after creation/expansion/becoming a GA, that the article is long enough, that it is neutral, contains no close paraphrasing or copyvio, that the hook is neutral, short enough, interesting, and is properly sourced with an inline source citation, that the article itself is adequately sourced and written in adequate English, etc.

We give new nominators at DYK a grace period: your first five nominations do not require a QPQ. Since you have so many active nominations—far beyond five, two of which have been placed into prep areas—I thought it was best to "assign" the five "free" nominations to already approved nominations as follows:

Alma, Anita, and Amabel are the three oldest of your unpromoted approved nominations, and thus the most likely to be promoted in the next days. All of the others will need QPQ reviews, both on the approved DYK noms page and the regular DYK noms page. You will want to start reviewing sooner rather than later, so your nominations are not delayed unduly because you haven't completed QPQs for them. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me or another DYK regular know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your heroic work reviewing so many nominations to satisfy your QPQ requirement. Unfortunately, it appears I had the rule wrong: after you have five DYK credits, you have to do QPQ reviews. Your first three credits are already on this page: Grace Hutchins and the other two. The Gillette and Michelet nominations will be your final two free credits, which means that Alma, Anita, and Amabel will require QPQs. I apologize for saying that you won't need QPQs for them, because I wasn't correct about that.
One thing I neglected to include in the second paragraph about DYK review requirements is that you need to check to see whether the nominator has included a QPQ review, and if not, whether they should have. If they should have but didn't, the tick should not be given. And you need to sign all of your posts on nominations pages, especially reviews. Thanks for your patience! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander S. Wolcott (inventor)

Thanks for DYK review of my 2-in-1 nomination (two articles). I think you forgot to sign with 4 " ~ " like I did here >> --Doug Coldwell (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/History of Medicine Society

Thankyou. I like your recommended hook too. Any advice on rest of article is welcome.Whispyhistory (talk) 13:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for L. Fidelia Woolley Gillette

On 18 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article L. Fidelia Woolley Gillette, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that L. Fidelia Woolley Gillette was one of the first women to be ordained as a Universalist minister in the United States, and the first woman ordained of any denomination in Canada? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/L. Fidelia Woolley Gillette. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, L. Fidelia Woolley Gillette), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:47, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Maren Michelet

On 19 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maren Michelet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the Minneapolis School Board decided to include North Germanic languages in the curriculum, Maren Michelet became the first teacher of Norwegian in a public high school in the US? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maren Michelet. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maren Michelet), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi

I get the feeling that my fault-finding with some of your hooks hasn't discouraged you from continued participation, and for that I'm glad. I hope you understand I have to call 'em as I see 'em. Keep up the good work! EEng 03:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Godmersham Park DYK

I've amended the hook as you suggested. Mjroots (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your review of Gao Minglu. I have tried at least three times to learn how to review dyk's but still don't understand the process. I hope you don't mind me 'stalking' your edits to see what I can learn from you. I really can't submit any more nominations until I do more reviewing. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS)   17:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Lillie Rose Ernst

Hi, there is a discussion going on about your hook at WT:DYK#Prep 3 - leader of *insert non-notable group here*. Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Yoninah: done The Potters (group) --Elisa.rolle (talk) 23:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Drmies (talk) 03:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Please see new note on the WT:DYK talk page. Yoninah (talk) 14:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replied Elisa.rolle (talk) 14:19, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Alma Lutz

On 22 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alma Lutz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alma Lutz was the biographer of women's rights activists including Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Emma Willard? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alma Lutz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alma Lutz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:02, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Daisy E. Nirdlinger) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Daisy E. Nirdlinger, Elisa.rolle!

Misplaced Pages editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If possible, kindly introduce more links to Nirdlinger's article from other articles (without spamming). Thanks again.

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—usernamekiran(talk) 20:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Thomas Lyle Williams

Hello! Your submission of Thomas Lyle Williams at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lillie Rose Ernst at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Caroline Risque

On 25 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caroline Risque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Caroline Risque (pictured) made the bronze busts of the four founders of Stix Baer & Fuller? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caroline Risque. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Caroline Risque), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

More than 10k views! - You can add her to the stats. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
not sure how to do it? --Elisa.rolle (talk) 18:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I felt the same when I met the page, then looked where the month is, how it's sorted, and copied a similar entry. Try it. It's on my watchlist. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Good entry, just wrong position: first stats (link above), then archive. I copied it to the current stats page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
ps: you and I have a woman pictured in August ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Lyle Williams

On 26 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Lyle Williams, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Lyle Williams had the idea to create the first mascara, Maybelline, after seeing his sister Mabel use a mix of petroleum jelly and burnt cork to darken her eyelashes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Lyle Williams. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Lyle Williams), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Geneve L. A. Shaffer

Hello! Your submission of Geneve L. A. Shaffer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 11:54, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

Hi, I notice you've submitted a lot of DYKs lately! Just a note that most of your hooks have to do with the woman being the "first". There have been numerous discussions about this at WT:DYK and at WP:Women in Red, with the upshot being that these women accomplished much more in their lives than being the "first", and we should highlight that instead. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for C. Louise Boehringer

On 28 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article C. Louise Boehringer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that C. Louise Boehringer, the first female Superintendent of Schools in Yuma County, has often been called "the mother of the Arizona educational system"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/C. Louise Boehringer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, C. Louise Boehringer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons.

Ana Recio Harvey.jpg

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Christian William Miller

On 29 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christian William Miller, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Christian William Miller, inventor of a water desalination device promoted by Franklin D. Roosevelt, was considered one of the most beautiful men in the 1940s New York gay society? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christian William Miller. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Christian William Miller), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Amabel Anderson Arnold

On 29 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Amabel Anderson Arnold, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Amabel Anderson Arnold, a St. Louis lawyer and law professor, received degrees from both Benton College of Law and City College of Law and Finance within a five-day period? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Amabel Anderson Arnold. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Amabel Anderson Arnold), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Barbara May Cameron

On 30 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barbara May Cameron, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1975, Barbara May Cameron, a member of the Hunkpapa Lakota, co-founded the first gay Indian organization in San Francisco? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barbara May Cameron. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Barbara May Cameron), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry if it feels like I am flooding your page :) But really good work! Alex Shih 07:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)--Elisa.rolle (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Not sorry at all I like it ;-) and there are I think other 4 DYK in prep... Elisa.rolle (talk) 07:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for E. Joy Johnson

On 31 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article E. Joy Johnson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that E. Joy Johnson wrote The Foreman of the J.A.6. based on her experience owning a ranch in frontierland Wyoming? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/E. Joy Johnson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, E. Joy Johnson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Helen Huntington Hull

On 1 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helen Huntington Hull, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Helen Huntington Hull inherited Among the Sierra Nevada, California (pictured) by Albert Bierstadt, she had it glued directly to a wall of her mansion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Huntington Hull. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helen Huntington Hull), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Lillie Rose Ernst

On 1 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lillie Rose Ernst, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lillie Rose Ernst, the first woman assistant superintendent of instruction in the St. Louis public school system, was the mentor of The Potters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lillie Rose Ernst. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lillie Rose Ernst), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for The Potters (artists group)

On 1 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Potters (artists group), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lillie Rose Ernst, the first woman assistant superintendent of instruction in the St. Louis public school system, was the mentor of The Potters? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Potters (artists group)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Isabel Pell

On 2 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Isabel Pell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American socialite Isabel Pell joined the Maquis and rescued a contingent of American soldiers in France during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Isabel Pell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Isabel Pell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih 00:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Katherine Winthrop McKean

Hello! Your submission of Katherine Winthrop McKean at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dr. K. 19:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi again. I added a comment at the nom page. Thanks. Dr. K. 01:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki-Project Oregon articles

Hi... I’ve noticed you created several bio articles about individual who lived in Oregon and thus have Wiki-Project Oregon tags on article Talk pages … thank you for contributing content to Wiki-Oregon. You rated the two articles I saw as Medium importance. I changed both to Low which is in line with Wiki-Oregon criterion discussed on our Assessment page. Over the years Wiki-Oregon has been very careful not to inflate importance or quality ratings … though there are probably some examples to the contrary out there. Here are three examples of articles about other people from Klamath Falls to compare with Wanda Brown Shaw. Henry Semon was a very successful farmer and one of the longest serving state representatives in Oregon history …his bio article is rated Low importance. George H. Merryman was a pioneer doctor, state reprehensive, state senator, and built the first modern hospital in Klamath Falls … his bio article is also rated Low importance. The bio article on Edward A. Geary is rated Medium importence … that is because he was Speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives and served briefly as acting governor of Oregon. As a side note, it’s general practice within Misplaced Pages to allow members of a specific project to grade articles related to that project … also self-assessments are not common (e.g while I created the three example articles above, their quality/importance ratings were done by another Wiki-Oregon editor). Wiki-Oregon is a very active group and we grade things pretty quickly once our New Oregon Article bot identifies new work. Let me close by once again thanking you for adding Wiki-Oregon related content … new articles are always welcome.--Orygun (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Orygun: may you please tell me which banner to use "without grade"? I put medium since the people I'm writing an article about were included in a book about women living in Oregon beginning of the XX century, and they were highlighted among others. Therefore I assumed their importance from there. But I'm more than willing to let other evaluate the grade. Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Just leave the class and importance sections blank … e.g. {WikiProject Oregon|class= |importance= }}. Someone from Wiki-Oregon will do assessment and fill in blanks with appropriate ratings. Regarding your source, ensuring notability is first step in identifying a subject suitable for Misplaced Pages … i.e. to qualify for inclusion in Misplaced Pages a subject (in this case, a person) must have bio facts cited in reliable third-party source (usually more than one). Books like the one you cited were common during early part of 20th century and are very useful in identifying notable people to write about; however, good sources don’t create importance. If you review Wiki-Oregon criterion for Medium important, we’re looking for people who had significant state-wide impact on some aspect of Oregon history, politics, geography, culture, etc., or have a modest level of national importance. People whose importance is local or less than significant at the state level are rated as Low importance. I don’t know about other Wiki-Project, but in Wiki-Oregon only 12% of our article are rated Medium, little over 2% are rated High, and a very small number (106) articles warrant Top importance.--Orygun (talk) 22:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Judith Ellen Foster

Hello! Your submission of Judith Ellen Foster at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pearlretta DuPuy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pearlretta DuPuy is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pearlretta DuPuy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ida Hinman

Hello! Your submission of Ida Hinman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Geneve L. A. Shaffer

On 4 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Geneve L. A. Shaffer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Geneve L. A. Shaffer, known as the "Skyscraper Girl", was the United States' first woman glider pilot? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Geneve L. A. Shaffer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Geneve L. A. Shaffer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)