Misplaced Pages

Manu Sharma: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:26, 8 October 2006 editMukerjee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers4,328 editsm The murder← Previous edit Revision as of 16:33, 8 October 2006 edit undoMukerjee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers4,328 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Manu Sharma''' (b. 1977) is widely believed to have murdered ]n model and documentary filmmaker ] in a crowded bar early in the morning of ], ]. Despite dozens of witnesses, Sharma was acquitted of all charges, along with seven other well-connected defendants by judge S.L. Bhayana on ], ]. '''Manu Sharma''' (b. 1977) is widely believed to have murdered ]n model and documentary filmmaker ] in a crowded bar early in the morning of ], ]. Despite dozens of witnesses, Sharma, who comes from a politically powerful family, was acquitted of all charges, along with seven other well-connected defendants, by judge S.L. Bhayana on ], ].


The decision left a situation where a prominent person was murdered in view of
Sharma is the son of leading ] politician ]
dozens of people, yet there was no one to point fingers to.
of the Indian ]. Venod Sharma has
Wide public outcry led to the case being re-admitted in the Delhi High court in
was a minister in the central ] cabinet, and at the time of
March 2006.
the crime, was president of the Congress Party in Haryana.

The family is related to ex-president ] and owns a
This case is widely viewed as a litmus test of India's turning image. It is one of several where the high and mighty have shown themselves to be above the
] (see ] and ]). Media
revelations in October 2006 have led to increasing optimism that the guilty
may finally been conducted.

==Family Background==
Manu Sharma is the son of leading ] politician ]
of the Indian ].
Venod Sharma, who had served as a Minister at the centre in the
] cabinet, was president of the Congress Party in Haryana
at the time of
the crime.
Manu's uncle is the son-in-law of former
president of India, ] and the family owns a
number of sugar mills and entertainment businesses in ], ] and ]. number of sugar mills and entertainment businesses in ], ] and ].

Despite the
negative image after the murder, Venod Sharma won elections and was inducted After the negative publicity following the murder, Venod Sharma
was denied a congress ticket for the Parliamentary elections, but
he managed to win a election to the state legislature and was inducted
into the State cabinet as Minister of Power. into the State cabinet as Minister of Power.


===The murder=== ===The murder===


Seven days after the murder, Manu confessed to the police, but this confession Seven days after the murder, Manu Sharma surrendered to the police,
and made a confession which was tape recorded. However, no attempt
was not used in obtaining evidence or otherwise mentioned during the
was made to formalize his statement in front of a magistrate or to
obtaining evidence based on this confession for the
trial. On October 2, 2006, trial. On October 2, 2006,
the ] news channel obtained the ] news channel obtained
Line 43: Line 61:
Manu along with friends Amardeep Singh and Alok Khanna (at the time Manu along with friends Amardeep Singh and Alok Khanna (at the time
both were senior executives with ] India), ] (son of both were senior executives with ] India), ] (son of
member of parliament ], and prime accused in the ] notorious criminal and member of parliament ] and prime accused in the ]
murder case), and Amit Jhingan, had entered the bar after it had closed. murder case), and Amit Jhingan, had entered the bar after it had closed.
Jessical Lal had rebuffed Jessical Lal had rebuffed
Line 52: Line 70:
into the air, and the second straight at Jessica's head, killing her immediately. into the air, and the second straight at Jessica's head, killing her immediately.


The five friends The five friends fled immediately.
Manu went into hiding for seven days, conferring with family, and initially Manu went into hiding for seven days, conferring with family, and initially
his father apparently said "face the punishment, what can I do?"<ref name=ndtv/> his father apparently said "face the punishment, what can I do?"
<ref name=ndtv>
{{cite web
but subsequently he started helping his son. They went underground in
|url=
a safe house in South Delhi, and the pistol was disposed of (it was never
http://www.ndtv.com/template/template.asp?fromtimeline=true&id=94382&callid=1&template=Jessicalall
recovered). After his surrender, one by one, all the statements by eyewitnesses,
|title=Jessica case: Venod Sharma quits Haryana ministry
|accessdate=2006-10-07
|date= 2006-10-06
|publisher = NDTV
}}</ref>
However, he subsequently started helping his son. Manu went underground in
a house indicated by his father in South Delhi, and
the pistol was disposed of (it was never
recovered - what Manu Sharma said about it is not clear).
After his surrender, one by one, all the statements by eyewitnesses,
as well as as well as
Manu's own confession, were retracted or were thrown out by the court Manu's own confession, were retracted or were thrown out by the court
due to inadequate legal process. due to inadequate legal process.


===Media Pressure=== ===The Cover-Up Operation===

Sharma was acquitted of all charges in February 2006. Not a single
trustworthy witness could be found, despte the fact that the murder had
been committed in the presence of dozens of people, including senior
police officers, at the bar of the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant in ].
All the witnesses who had originally claimed to have seen Manu Sharma shoot Jessica turned ] during the protracted court case, and it appears likely that the ] related to the spent shells was doctored by the police, since two cartridges sent for testing turned out to have been fired from different guns. In view of the fact that the weapon was never recovered, other police officers themselves questioned as to why the bullets were at all sent for testing.

Not many people in Chandigarh are surprised at the acquittal of this allegedly high profile criminal. Until a few days before the judgement, 29-year-old Manu was seen attending parties in the town, and running his popular disco-cum-pub, Blue Ice, in Chandigarh’s posh Sector 17 market. He has a reputation for throwing well-organised parties around town.

The Sharma family is known for manipulating and ‘managing’ things, a claim backed by reports of Manu getting into several brawls in recent years, with the family intervening in each instance to prevent any case from being registered. A Congress councillor in Chandigarh said that a compromise would be worked out in most cases. Soon after he was released on bail in 2003, there was a fight between employees of Blue Ice and some customers; Manu too was reportedly involved, but eventually, he was taken out of the case and the disco’s manager was booked instead.

The acquittal caused
widespread outrage in India. The President, ], and others
were appealed to so that the case could be reopened,
since it appeared to be a clear case of brazen misuse of power and
influence by persons in high places. Even in the
venal atmosphere of the criminal justice system in India where the art of buying/ intimidating/ cajoling witnesses and bribing investigating policemen is well
known, the circumstances are by many deemed too shocking. Subsequently a new
case has been filed and Manu is currently being tried.

On March 22, 2006, the Delhi High Court admitted an appeal by the police against
the Jessica Lal murder acquittals, issuing bailable warrants against
prime accused Manu Sharma and eight others and also restrained them from
leaving the country.
<ref name=hindu>{{
cite news
|publisher = Hindu
|url=http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/19/stories/2006041924460300.htm
|title=Manu Sharma, seven others granted bail: The ninth accused fails to appear before the court
|date=2006-04-19
|accessdate=2006-10-08
}}</ref>

===Anatomy of the Cover-Up Operation===


In the original trial, very few would come forward to depose. In the original trial, very few would come forward to depose.
Line 108: Line 103:
the magazine ] carried out a three month long sting operation the magazine ] carried out a three month long sting operation
against these three key witnesses, which was aired in a leading against these three key witnesses, which was aired in a leading
Hindi News channel, leading to increasing furore.<ref name=tehelka>{{ Hindi News channel, leading to increasing furore.
<ref name=tehelka>{{
cite news cite news
|publisher = Star News/Tehelka |publisher = Star News/Tehelka
Line 140: Line 136:
] and ], Delhi where he would collect money. ] and ], Delhi where he would collect money.
Friends and drinking buddies Friends and drinking buddies
who would go with him mention a total figure between Rs. who would go with him mention that a total figure between Rs.
20 Lakhs and Rs. 35 lakhs (at a salary of Rs. 10,000 p.m., this is more than twenty year's wages). 20 Lakhs to 35 lakhs was paid.
Here is part of the conversation that the Tehelka reporter had with a friend Here is part of the conversation that the Tehelka reporter had with a friend
of Karan<ref name=tehelka />: of Karan<ref name=tehelka />:


:Surendra: I saw him taking receiving money at Okhla. :*Surendra: I saw him taking receiving money at Okhla.
:Question: Where at Okhla? :*Question: Where at Okhla?
:Surendra: From Sharma’s place. In front of Okhla depot there is a building. Sharma owns entire building. We used to collect money from there itself. :*Surendra: From Sharma’s place. In front of Okhla depot there is a building. Sharma owns entire building. We used to collect money from there itself.
:Question: How much money? :*Question: How much money?
:Surendra: Whatever we needed? :*Surendra: Whatever we needed?
:Question: Whatever you say! :*Question: Whatever you say!
:Surendra: Whatever we demand. We used to get 20 25 thousand every month just like that. His number is in mamu’s ( Karan Rajput) diary. :*Surendra: Whatever we demand. We used to get 20 25 thousand every month just like that. His number is in mamu’s ( Karan Rajput) diary. <BR>...
:*Question: Would you accompany Rajput when he used to go to collect money ?
:...
:*Surendra: Yes.
:Question: Would you accompany Rajput when he used to go to collect money ?
:*Question: How would they pay, cheque or cash?
:Surendra: Yes.
:*Surendra: Cheque.
:Question: How would they pay, cheque or cash?
:*Question: How much money would come?
:Surendra: Cheque.
:*Surendra: They gave twice in Nepal.
:Question: How much money would come?
:*Question: When you would go to Okhla was the amount fixed?
:Surendra: They gave twice in Nepal.
:*Surendra: Later they fixed it at 20 thousand. Initially he would 60 thousand sometime up to one or two lakh. Sharma had taken his (Karan Rajput) life’s entire responsibility.
:Question: When you would go to Okhla was the amount fixed?
:Surendra: Later they fixed it at 20 thousand. Initially he would 60 thousand sometime up to one or two lakh. Sharma had taken his (Karan Rajput) life’s entire responsibility.


Another witness, the electrician Another witness, the electrician
Line 175: Line 170:
to him were he to tell the truth. to him were he to tell the truth.


Another witness, Shyan Munshi, who was serving behind the A third witness, Shyan Munshi was right there, serving behind the
bar with Jessica, had signed an affidavit with the police witnessing bar with Jessica. He comes from an upper class family and it was initially
hoped that he would be a reliable witness.
the murder. However, in court he said that he did not know Hindi and
He initially signed a First Information Report
with the police witnessing to
the murder, and that both shots were fired by the same person.
However, later in court he said that he did not know Hindi and
could not tell what he had signed - and then he changed the story could not tell what he had signed - and then he changed the story
to state that Manu had only fired once, at the ceiling. The second shot,
entirely. Subsequently it turned out that he had acted in a
the one that killed Jessica, was
fired by someone else, whom he could not describe.

Subsequently the media revealed that he had acted in a
number of hindi-speaking films. When a reporter posing as a casting director number of hindi-speaking films. When a reporter posing as a casting director
for a foreign for a foreign
film venture approached him, he was very candid about knowing Hindi well.<ref name=tehelka />: film venture approached him, he discussed nuances of Hindi grammar<ref name=tehelka />:
"Like in Hindi word `car’ is feminine gender while in Bengali it’s neutral gender."


There were indications that the Delhi Police also may have introduced false
:Munshi : There is a minor difference between grammar of Hindi and Bengali. Like in Hindi word `car’ is feminine gender while in Bengali it’s neutral gender.
], by switching one of the spent cartridges for another 0.22 one - subsequently the tests indicated that the two cartridges had been fired from different guns. This together with Shyan Munshi's testimony, led to the "two-gun theory" and completely
undermined the prosecution's own case.
In view of the fact that the weapon was never recovered, other police officers themselves questioned as to why the bullets were at all sent for testing.


===Acquittal===
Shyan was also recently detained while trying to leave the country illegally.


Sharma was acquitted of all charges in February 2006. Not a single
In the High Court trial, these exposés have raised
trustworthy witness could be found, despte the fact that the murder had
hopes that evidence will now be uncovered of
been committed in the presence of dozens of people, including senior
police officers, at the bar of the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant in ].
All the witnesses who had originally claimed to have seen Manu Sharma shoot Jessica turned ] during the six years of the court case.

Not many people in Chandigarh are surprised at the acquittal of this allegedly high profile criminal. Until a few days before the judgement, 29-year-old Manu was seen attending parties in the town, and running his popular disco-cum-pub, Blue Ice, in Chandigarh’s posh Sector 17 market. He has a reputation for throwing well-organised parties around town. Shortly after he was released on bail in 2003, there was a fight between employees of Blue Ice and some customers; Manu too was reportedly involved, but
his name was dropped from the case and the disco’s manager was booked instead.

===Media Pressure===
The acquittal caused
widespread outrage in India. The President, ], and others
were appealed to so that the case could be reopened,
since it appeared to be a clear case of brazen misuse of power and
influence by persons in high places. Even in the
venal atmosphere of the criminal justice system in India where the art of buying/ intimidating/ cajoling witnesses and bribing investigating policemen is well
known, the circumstances were deemed too shocking.

On March 22, 2006, the Delhi High Court admitted an appeal by the police against
the Jessica Lal murder acquittals, issuing bailable warrants against
prime accused Manu Sharma and eight others and restraining them from
leaving the country.
<ref name=hindu>{{
cite news
|publisher = Hindu
|url=http://www.hindu.com/2006/04/19/stories/2006041924460300.htm
|title=Manu Sharma, seven others granted bail: The ninth accused fails to appear before the court
|date=2006-04-19
|accessdate=2006-10-08
}}</ref>

The further revelations in the media <ref name=ndtv/><ref name=tehelka/> have
rekindled hopes that additional evidence may now be presented for both
the original crime as well as
the cover-up - in terms of cheque payments and other connections. Also, the cover-up - in terms of cheque payments and other connections. Also,
Venod Sharma's mobile phone number was found among Venod Sharma's mobile phone number was found among
the numbers listed on Karan Rajput's mobile; these calls could also be traced. the numbers listed on Karan Rajput's mobile; these calls could also be traced.

The prosecution is under considerable pressure in the court cases. The media
pressure is also telling on the key witnesses, especially Shyan Munshi.
In May 2006, Shyan tried to illegally leave the country but was arrested at
] airport.


===Venod Sharma Resigns=== ===Venod Sharma Resigns===


On October 6, 2006, Venod Sharma, under increasing pressure in parliament The media exposes, directly linking Venod Sharma to the key witnesses,
led to calls for his resignation in the ], particularly
based on his role in shielding his son, resigned
from the opposition party ].
On October 6, 2006, Venod Sharma, succumbed to the pressure and resigned
from the Congress ministry in Haryana. <ref name=ndtv /> from the Congress ministry in Haryana. <ref name=ndtv />



Revision as of 16:33, 8 October 2006

Manu Sharma (b. 1977) is widely believed to have murdered Indian model and documentary filmmaker Jessica Lal in a crowded bar early in the morning of April 29, 1999. Despite dozens of witnesses, Sharma, who comes from a politically powerful family, was acquitted of all charges, along with seven other well-connected defendants, by judge S.L. Bhayana on February 21, 2006.

The decision left a situation where a prominent person was murdered in view of dozens of people, yet there was no one to point fingers to. Wide public outcry led to the case being re-admitted in the Delhi High court in March 2006.

This case is widely viewed as a litmus test of India's turning image. It is one of several where the high and mighty have shown themselves to be above the Law in India (see Sanjeev Nanda and Priyadarshini Mattoo). Media revelations in October 2006 have led to increasing optimism that the guilty may finally been conducted.

Family Background

Manu Sharma is the son of leading Haryana politician Venod Sharma of the Indian Congress Party. Venod Sharma, who had served as a Minister at the centre in the Narasimha Rao cabinet, was president of the Congress Party in Haryana at the time of the crime. Manu's uncle is the son-in-law of former president of India, Shankar Dayal Sharma and the family owns a number of sugar mills and entertainment businesses in Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh.

After the negative publicity following the murder, Venod Sharma was denied a congress ticket for the Parliamentary elections, but he managed to win a election to the state legislature and was inducted into the State cabinet as Minister of Power.

The murder

Seven days after the murder, Manu Sharma surrendered to the police, and made a confession which was tape recorded. However, no attempt was made to formalize his statement in front of a magistrate or to obtaining evidence based on this confession for the trial. On October 2, 2006, the NDTV news channel obtained the audiotape of the confession and broadcast some segments from it:

  • Manu: There was Jessica Lall, I did not know her name.
    I was told even if you give a thousand bucks, I will not give a sip of wine and I said that we have got an arrangement there. I pulled out my pistol there.
    ...
    Yes, that is inside the Colonade. So it went into the roof and nobody bothered, nobody moved. Then I pointed at Jessica and what I intended to do was I pointed slightly away from her so that I could see her hair, I wanted to generally shoot.
  • Police: What was the idea?
  • Manu: The idea at that time was to shoot in challenge. It was embarrassing to hear that even if I paid a thousand bucks I would not get a sip of drink.
    I pointed towards her a little and fired the shot. So I think I hit someone, I was just trying to see what had happened, when this lady comes up there.
  • Police: What type of lady?
  • Manu: Oldish, thin and she says you don't worry and stay here and then I realised something had happened. Then I could hear people saying somebody has shot.
    I knew I should move. I took a lift on scooter/motorcycle and I saw a little garden and sort of a dhaba and I put my pistol there. I took a hitch from a scooter, a Tata Safari and a tractor before I reached right in front of Tony's house.
    Alok and Vikas were all there by that time. When I inquired, they told me, "I think she is dead". I said single gunshot, he said, "yes". I said who is she – "Jessica Lall".

A number of eye witnesses made initial statements that corroborated with this confession. A consistent story emerged: Manu along with friends Amardeep Singh and Alok Khanna (at the time both were senior executives with Coca-Cola India), Vikas Yadav (son of notorious criminal and member of parliament DP Yadav and prime accused in the Nitish Katara murder case), and Amit Jhingan, had entered the bar after it had closed. Jessical Lal had rebuffed Manu's request for a drink. A powerful politician's son, Manu was unaccustomed to being denied. An altercation ensued, and at one point Manu commented that "I could have a sip of you for Rs 1000." Eventually Manu brought out his 0.22 pistol from his pocket, and fired one shot into the air, and the second straight at Jessica's head, killing her immediately.

The five friends fled immediately. Manu went into hiding for seven days, conferring with family, and initially his father apparently said "face the punishment, what can I do?" However, he subsequently started helping his son. Manu went underground in a house indicated by his father in South Delhi, and the pistol was disposed of (it was never recovered - what Manu Sharma said about it is not clear). After his surrender, one by one, all the statements by eyewitnesses, as well as Manu's own confession, were retracted or were thrown out by the court due to inadequate legal process.

The Cover-Up Operation

In the original trial, very few would come forward to depose. Eyewitnesses who initially claimed to have seen the murder, such as Shyan Munshi, Karan Rajput and Shivdas Yadav, all turned hostile. Increasingly, revelations in the media have been piecing together the story of the pressure, bribery and coercion that led to this reversal.

In July-September 2006, the magazine Tehelka carried out a three month long sting operation against these three key witnesses, which was aired in a leading Hindi News channel, leading to increasing furore.

One of the key witnesses was Karan Rajput, who was present at the restaurant to borrow money from his nephew, Jitendra, the manager at the bar. Rajput who had long been an alcoholic, was asked by his nephew to sit at a chair which happened to be facing the bar where Shayan and Jessica were making drinks. After the murder, Karan initially claimed that he had witnessed how a boy in a white T-shirt came up to the bar and shot Jessica. However, in the court testimony, he turned hostile, denying that he had been there at all.

After the incident Karan Rajput lived a life of parties and drinking bouts - although he had no job or other visible means of income. In January 2005, he died of cirrhosis of the liver. The Tehelka expose revealed that Karan Rajput was a regular visitor to Venod Sharma's offices in Chandigarh and Okhla, Delhi where he would collect money. Friends and drinking buddies who would go with him mention that a total figure between Rs. 20 Lakhs to 35 lakhs was paid. Here is part of the conversation that the Tehelka reporter had with a friend of Karan:

  • Surendra: I saw him taking receiving money at Okhla.
  • Question: Where at Okhla?
  • Surendra: From Sharma’s place. In front of Okhla depot there is a building. Sharma owns entire building. We used to collect money from there itself.
  • Question: How much money?
  • Surendra: Whatever we needed?
  • Question: Whatever you say!
  • Surendra: Whatever we demand. We used to get 20 25 thousand every month just like that. His number is in mamu’s ( Karan Rajput) diary.
    ...
  • Question: Would you accompany Rajput when he used to go to collect money ?
  • Surendra: Yes.
  • Question: How would they pay, cheque or cash?
  • Surendra: Cheque.
  • Question: How much money would come?
  • Surendra: They gave twice in Nepal.
  • Question: When you would go to Okhla was the amount fixed?
  • Surendra: Later they fixed it at 20 thousand. Initially he would 60 thousand sometime up to one or two lakh. Sharma had taken his (Karan Rajput) life’s entire responsibility.

Another witness, the electrician Shivdas Yadav, was standing behind the bar when the murder occurred. In his initial statement, subsequently retracted, he also claimed to have witnessed the murder by Manu. At some point before the trial, Shivdas also came into some money with which and opened an electrician's business in Uttar Pradesh. Recently, when a journalist from Tehelka called Shivdas posing to be Jessica Lal's grieving sister, Shivdas admitted that his initial confession, and that of the others, were all true, and that he was scared of what might happen to him were he to tell the truth.

A third witness, Shyan Munshi was right there, serving behind the bar with Jessica. He comes from an upper class family and it was initially hoped that he would be a reliable witness. He initially signed a First Information Report with the police witnessing to the murder, and that both shots were fired by the same person. However, later in court he said that he did not know Hindi and could not tell what he had signed - and then he changed the story to state that Manu had only fired once, at the ceiling. The second shot, the one that killed Jessica, was fired by someone else, whom he could not describe.

Subsequently the media revealed that he had acted in a number of hindi-speaking films. When a reporter posing as a casting director for a foreign film venture approached him, he discussed nuances of Hindi grammar: "Like in Hindi word `car’ is feminine gender while in Bengali it’s neutral gender."

There were indications that the Delhi Police also may have introduced false forensic evidence, by switching one of the spent cartridges for another 0.22 one - subsequently the tests indicated that the two cartridges had been fired from different guns. This together with Shyan Munshi's testimony, led to the "two-gun theory" and completely undermined the prosecution's own case. In view of the fact that the weapon was never recovered, other police officers themselves questioned as to why the bullets were at all sent for testing.

Acquittal

Sharma was acquitted of all charges in February 2006. Not a single trustworthy witness could be found, despte the fact that the murder had been committed in the presence of dozens of people, including senior police officers, at the bar of the Tamarind Court Cafe restaurant in Delhi. All the witnesses who had originally claimed to have seen Manu Sharma shoot Jessica turned hostile during the six years of the court case.

Not many people in Chandigarh are surprised at the acquittal of this allegedly high profile criminal. Until a few days before the judgement, 29-year-old Manu was seen attending parties in the town, and running his popular disco-cum-pub, Blue Ice, in Chandigarh’s posh Sector 17 market. He has a reputation for throwing well-organised parties around town. Shortly after he was released on bail in 2003, there was a fight between employees of Blue Ice and some customers; Manu too was reportedly involved, but his name was dropped from the case and the disco’s manager was booked instead.

Media Pressure

The acquittal caused widespread outrage in India. The President, Abdul Kalam, and others were appealed to so that the case could be reopened, since it appeared to be a clear case of brazen misuse of power and influence by persons in high places. Even in the venal atmosphere of the criminal justice system in India where the art of buying/ intimidating/ cajoling witnesses and bribing investigating policemen is well known, the circumstances were deemed too shocking.

On March 22, 2006, the Delhi High Court admitted an appeal by the police against the Jessica Lal murder acquittals, issuing bailable warrants against prime accused Manu Sharma and eight others and restraining them from leaving the country.

The further revelations in the media have rekindled hopes that additional evidence may now be presented for both the original crime as well as the cover-up - in terms of cheque payments and other connections. Also, Venod Sharma's mobile phone number was found among the numbers listed on Karan Rajput's mobile; these calls could also be traced.

The prosecution is under considerable pressure in the court cases. The media pressure is also telling on the key witnesses, especially Shyan Munshi. In May 2006, Shyan tried to illegally leave the country but was arrested at Kolkata airport.

Venod Sharma Resigns

The media exposes, directly linking Venod Sharma to the key witnesses, led to calls for his resignation in the Parliament of India, particularly from the opposition party Indian Lok Dal. On October 6, 2006, Venod Sharma, succumbed to the pressure and resigned from the Congress ministry in Haryana.

References

  1. Anasuya Roy (2006-10-02). "NDTV gets Manu Sharma's taped confession". NDTV. Retrieved 2006-10-07.
  2. ^ "Jessica case: Venod Sharma quits Haryana ministry". NDTV. 2006-10-06. Retrieved 2006-10-07.
  3. ^ "English Translation of the transcript of the news expose "Case Ke Kaatil", produced by Tehelka, and aired on Star News". Star News/Tehelka. 2006-09-26. Retrieved 2006-10-07.
  4. Vineet Khare and Harinder Baweja. "Killers of Justice". Retrieved 2006-10-06.
  5. "Manu Sharma, seven others granted bail: The ninth accused fails to appear before the court". Hindu. 2006-04-19. Retrieved 2006-10-08.

  1. Manu Sharma Picture in
Categories: