Misplaced Pages

User talk:Propol: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:32, 9 October 2006 editPropol (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,703 edits Image copyright problem with Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png: Remove warning which had no basis.← Previous edit Revision as of 13:27, 10 October 2006 edit undo207.195.254.16 (talk) Noting POROPL account as single purposeNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''THIS IS A SINGLE PURPOSE ACCOUNT'''
Hi.

==Welcome==
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <font color=#0000FF>Propol</font>, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! ] <sup>]</sup> 18:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)</div>
|}
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting your info out there</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting more Misplaced Pages rules</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ]
|-
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting help</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting along</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #cef2e0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting technical</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
|-
|}
|}
|}
<!--Template:Welcomeg-->

== roskam ==

Hi Propol,

I'm wondering why you oppose adding the Josh Marshall text to the Roskam article. Feel free to reply &mdash; ] ] 18:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

==]==
I was asked, as I set out, in a bit more detail, at ], to act as an ] for ] relative to the Roskam article, and I have attempted to delineate precisely those issues about which Joe is concerned and to frame several questions rather clearly in order that a focused discussion might be undertaken. On Joe's behalf, and in view of my appreciation for the advancement of the project, I'd ask that, at your leisure, you offer your views at the Roskam talk page. Thanks very kindly in advance! ] 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
:I posted a response at ]. Thanks. ] 18:08, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

== Your ANI posting ==

Propol, I've responded to your ]. I hope both parties will be open to dispute resolution and that both of the articles will become balanced. &mdash; ] (]) 12:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for the reponse. I also provided an update there. ] 15:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

:: Moving this conversation from ANI to your talk page. On blogs &mdash; Can you ] that the Zorn blog does have editorial oversight/fact checking? While I do agree that a ''Chicago Tribune'' columnist is likely a reliable source, the distinction between blogs may be a difficult argument to make when you are trying to convince other editors. &mdash; ] (]) 16:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

== email ==

Propol, could you send your email address ]? &mdash; ] ] 20:51, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

==Image copyright problem with Image:Salvi Roskam Maher.png==
Thanks for uploading ]. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The ] is very careful about the images included in ] because of ] (see Misplaced Pages's ]).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are ], ], and ]. Find the appropriate template in ] and place it on the image page like this: <code>{&#123;TemplateName}}</code>. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the ]. Thank you. ] 01:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

:I posted a response on the talk page for image itself. I think there is a template already specified (''newspapercover''). It was used under fair use, with a copyright held by the '']''. I also provided the original source link. Please help me retain this image. I have attempted to follow all of the rules. Am I missing something? Thanks. ] 04:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
::I see that an anonymous editor removed your tag the day after you uploaded it . I have restored your original text and tag. However, I am not sure that this use qualifies under ]. Misplaced Pages is very strict about the use of fair use content, to avoid legal problems for the foundation. According to that criteria, fair use images can be allowed for various reasons, the applicable one for this case is likely: ''"Other promotional material. Posters, programs, billboards, ads. For critical commentary."'' My understanding is that by critical commentary, it means that they are referring to criticism of the content of the ad itself. As I understanding it, your use of the image is to illustrate that one of the attorneys in the ad, who is also a politician, is a personal injury lawyer. I don't think that qualifies.
::To give you an example of how strict this fair use policy is, the ] article is not allowed to show a ] cover that features Manning's photo, because it not used for critical commentary of the image itself. I know it sounds silly, but that is apparently how it works.
::Another thing that I noticed, is that the link you provided is no longer active, so it is no longer ]. Perhaps you can see if the Chicago Tribune moved the image to another URL, or perhaps they removed it because they considered it to be a copyright violation. I hope this helps. --] 05:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

:::], thanks for your response, and I understand your point. However, I do still think the picture qualifies under fair use. The advertisement itself (not just Roskam) was the subject of an article in the '']''. a link to the article, including the picture in question. Thanks. ] 16:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

<nowiki><indent reset></nowiki><br/>
Actually, that is a different version of an ad for the same law firm. In this situation, I believe, the copyright is not held by the newspaper, but the law firm that paid the newspaper to publish the ad. And you must state the fair use criteria you are using:
:'''''To the uploader:''' please add a detailed fair use rationale for each use, as described on ], as well as the source of the work and copyright information.''
You must state the fair use rationale for each article you include, i.e.:

:<nowiki>== Fair use for ] ==</nowiki>
:<nowiki># rationale #1</nowiki>
:<nowiki># rationale #2</nowiki>
:<nowiki># etc....</nowiki>
Again, I apologize if this seems like a lot of hoops to jump through, but wikipedia has a rather strict interpretation of the fair use laws. --] 17:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


::Greetings, in reviewing the ] article, I saw the ad for Mr. Roskams Law firm and wonder if Propol has recived permission to put it up in wikipedia by either the Chicago Tribune and Roskams Law Firm. If said permission is not obtained, and since this ad seems not to fall under fair use, I feel that this Image, per stated Misplaced Pages policy regarding image copyright should be removed, forth with, from the Misplaced Pages image database. Thanks. ] 23:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
:::This image is listed at ]. I don't feel that I am enough of an authority on copyright and fair use issues to say whether or not this image is legitimate fair use and who holds the copyright, but perhaps someone more experienced can help clarify this. --] 01:09, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:27, 10 October 2006

THIS IS A SINGLE PURPOSE ACCOUNT