| Revision as of 12:36, 14 October 2006 editSankili kumar (talk | contribs)12 editsm →Citations Needed← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:58, 14 October 2006 edit undoSri119 (talk | contribs)13 edits →Citations Needed: Seems this guy should have a personal problemNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| :: Some citations on the HR abuses section provide only accusations by certain opposing groups or individuals and do not prove them as facts. Especially references 4, 5, and 7 from the BBC only contain accusations by individuals. Please kindly find references to prove these are facts or acknowledge that they are only accusations which are POV and hence duely removed from the wikipedia article. Again please read the help section for guidance. ] 01:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC) | :: Some citations on the HR abuses section provide only accusations by certain opposing groups or individuals and do not prove them as facts. Especially references 4, 5, and 7 from the BBC only contain accusations by individuals. Please kindly find references to prove these are facts or acknowledge that they are only accusations which are POV and hence duely removed from the wikipedia article. Again please read the help section for guidance. ] 01:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::By asking all over the Sri Lankan Army article for citations it seems this guy(Elalan) should have a personal problem with them. If you don't have such personal problems with Sri Lankan Army Elalan, I'm ask from you to move your step towards ] article. If my vision is ok, there should be hell lots of works awaiting for you. Especially the bottom section of that article. Happy editing!!! ] 13:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:58, 14 October 2006
Buffel mine-protected APC - Body now built also by SL army Military with modifications - what modifications? what source? I can't find any source for the Buffel body now been maufactured in Sri Lanka --Jcw69 08:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you 222.165.176.40 for the information --Jcw69 16:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Human rights allegations
- I added a new section, human rights allegations, I thought that it is essential to understand the nature of the organization. A member har removed what I wrote there, which I reverted later. Anyone can you independantly tell your opinion whether it is needed or not? --∞Sechzehn16∞ 14:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- As I noted before, I think it is needed to maintain a seperate section regarding the human rights allegations. Deleteing that will violate NPOV. --∞Sechzehn16∞ 15:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree the human rights allegations section needs to be added and is long overdue. Elalan 20:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Elalan for your opinion, hope you can help me to contribute more to the section. --∞Sechzehn16∞ 23:37, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll certain help where I can. Elalan 02:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- I agree the human rights allegations section needs to be added and is long overdue. Elalan 20:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank You for the references for the human rights section from Elalan/Sechzehn , well researched. Could you also find some references for the other sections as well. Also attempt to cite a fair and balanced description of the facts. Specifically the references from sangam.com and wsws.org are noted. Please try something from bbc etc, Im sure there's plenty. For more info see the help pages on referencing. Sankili_kumar 12:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Citations Needed
Whole sections and paragraphs need citations. It looks as if they copied from somewhere whole-scale. Nevertheless the citations must be there to ensure verifiability of all the details. If the stuff can't be cited after three weeks, then it will have to be moved to the talk page. Elalan 20:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Some citations on the HR abuses section provide only accusations by certain opposing groups or individuals and do not prove them as facts. Especially references 4, 5, and 7 from the BBC only contain accusations by individuals. Please kindly find references to prove these are facts or acknowledge that they are only accusations which are POV and hence duely removed from the wikipedia article. Again please read the help section for guidance. Sankili_kumar 01:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- By asking all over the Sri Lankan Army article for citations it seems this guy(Elalan) should have a personal problem with them. If you don't have such personal problems with Sri Lankan Army Elalan, I'm ask from you to move your step towards Indian Army article. If my vision is ok, there should be hell lots of works awaiting for you. Especially the bottom section of that article. Happy editing!!! Sri119 13:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)