| Revision as of 19:05, 14 October 2006 editDigitalCatalyst (talk | contribs)535 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:04, 15 October 2006 edit undoPPGMD (talk | contribs)1,955 edits Already mentioned in the articleNext edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
*By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
*By taking the policies on ] seriously. Half of the article should be deleted immediately, as it is all unsourced material. As a start, I would recommend {{tl|fact}}-tagging '''all''' unsourced claims ] 12:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
*Forgive me if I missed this, but in reading the account of the 2000 election I did not notice a reference to Al Gore's having won the popular vote, nor any refernce to the controversy regarding Sandra Day O'Connor's alleged reaction to the early call of Florida for Gore, which if true revealed her bias and was grounds for recusing herself. Thanks] 16:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
*As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
*As a public figure, Bush is not subject to the same level of protection for libel by the US. We should not make unverified claims, but such claims do not pose the same risk as on non-public figure's biography. ] 01:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
*Section on environmental issues<!-- atrocities -->. --] 05:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
|
*Section on environmental issues<!-- atrocities -->. --] 05:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |