Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:44, 24 December 2017

To stop Monkbot, add a message to its talk page. Comments and questions about Monkbot are welcome here.

Reference consistency at the Vagina article

Hey, Trappist the monk. I saw that you helped with the reference style at the Vagina article not too long ago. Will you continue to do so, like you do at the Clitoris article? I ask because it's needed help. For example, right now there are "defined multiple times with different content" issues at the article. Thanks in advance if you continue to help. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

I can do that.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 00:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Related to this...I have gone through your edits so that I can learn exactly how to format them in this article. I noticed that for journal articles, each author is listed separately. Then for the books, the parameter |vauthors is used with one list of the authors. Is this right? Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 23:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that almost all of the changes since this edit have used |vauthors= and/or |veditors= for the author/editor names lists. Before Editor Flyer22 Reborn chose Vancouver system I had fixed a handful of templates that use the discouraged |authors= parameter by simply inserting |authorn= parameters. Those templates will be updated to use |vauthors= when I get to them.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 00:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hi, would you mind taking a look at refs # 550 and 553 in the refs section of List of current ships of the United States Navy? There is some type of error involving the "NVR Module" and apparently you're the guy that would know how to fix it. Thanks - WOLFchild 05:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

DDG-127 added to Module:NVR/data. CVN-81 not in NVR so I've hidden that reference until NVR gets round to adding that ship.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 10:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Test edits

Hi there. I seem to be having the same issue with an editor that you had here. This editor is now "testing" their template on high-traffic articles, and edit waring over it. I'd value your opinion. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Things seem to have quieted in mainspace and the template is now at TfD.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 00:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry

@Trappist the monk: Ok then, I'll won't edit the main module then. Sorry for that. --★BrandonALF★ 00:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Module:Lang broken

Something got seriously broken with the module. Take a look at Paracel Islands or Nanjing or any other Chinese lang template... //Halibutt 01:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

南京市