Misplaced Pages

Gish gallop: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:56, 6 March 2018 editAshmoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,078 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:57, 6 March 2018 edit undoAshmoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,078 edits →Technique and counter measuresNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.<ref name=>{{harvnb|Hayward|2015|p=67}}</ref> The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially, if no independent fact-checking is involved,<ref name="grant2011">{{harvnb|Grant|2011|p=74}}</ref> or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics. During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.<ref name=>{{harvnb|Hayward|2015|p=67}}</ref> The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially, if no independent fact-checking is involved,<ref name="grant2011">{{harvnb|Grant|2011|p=74}}</ref> or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.


Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one.<ref name="johnson">{{harvnb|Johnson|2017|p=14-15}}</ref> If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered somewhat during a debate, by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.<ref name="grant2015">{{harvnb|Grant|2015|p=55}}</ref> Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one.<ref name="johnson">{{harvnb|Johnson|2017|p=14-15}}</ref> If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.<ref name="grant2015">{{harvnb|Grant|2015|p=55}}</ref>


== See also == == See also ==

Revision as of 09:57, 6 March 2018

"Gish gallop" is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.

The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently against science-based opponents on the topic of evolution.

Technique and counter measures

During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place. The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially, if no independent fact-checking is involved, or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.

Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one. If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.

See also

Notes

  1. Scott 2004, p. 23
  2. Scott 1994
  3. Hayward 2015, p. 67
  4. Grant 2011, p. 74
  5. Johnson 2017, p. 14-15
  6. Grant 2015, p. 55

References

  • Grant, John (2011). Denying Science: Conspiracy Theories, Media Distortions, and the War Against Reality. Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781616144005.
  • Grant, John (2015). Debunk it: How to Stay Sane in a World of Misinformation. San Francisco: Zest Books. ISBN 978-1-936976-68-3.
  • Hayward, C.J.S. (2015). The Seraphinians: '"Blessed Seraphim Rose" and His Axe-Wielding Western Converts. The Collected Works of C.J.S. Hayward. San Francisco: Zest Books.
  • Johnson, Amy (2017). Gasser, Urs (ed.). "The Multiple Harms of Sea Lions" (PDF). Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. p. 14.
Propaganda techniques
Categories: