| Revision as of 20:46, 19 October 2006 view sourceMoe Epsilon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,291 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:08, 22 October 2006 view source Edison (talk | contribs)Administrators53,898 edits question how deletion discussion consensus was deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
| :::The edit summary may not have been civil, but Moe made false statements about me and refuses to accept that what he said was false. I don't let people make up stuff about me, especially negative stuff. - ] ] 20:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | :::The edit summary may not have been civil, but Moe made false statements about me and refuses to accept that what he said was false. I don't let people make up stuff about me, especially negative stuff. - ] ] 20:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I never made up anything about you, just leave me alone already. — ] 20:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | ::::I never made up anything about you, just leave me alone already. — ] 20:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Deletion of Andy Stephenson article== | |||
| I see that you were the closing administrator for the Andy Stephenson article, and you deleted it. Is an administrator assigned an article for closing review or did you choose to be the one? And how did you arrive at the decision that the article did not reach WP:BIO? I understand that it is not a vote, but ignoring SPAs I count 20 for keep and 25 for deletion. How is it determined that a consensus for deletion is achieved? As for notability, the subject had multiple mainstream media coverage of his work on black box voting as I mentioned 07:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC): He is in an HBO movie, there were 3 articles cited from the Seattle Weekly and other west coast publications, he is in articles cited from the New York Times, the Washington Post and The Guardian (London),plus a story on Fox News. Several of these mention his national campaign for voter verified paper trails and his Secretary of State candidacy. Many Misplaced Pages bio articles have far less national or international coverage of notability. So please advise me as to how he failed WP:BIO. Also, many of those favoring deletion suggested that any mention of him be in the ] article. How do I get a copy of the deleted article to use the references in improving the Blavk Box Voting article? Thank you for your efforts to improve Misplaced Pages.] 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:08, 22 October 2006
Nitrous
Do you care to explain why you are doing reverts to blatant spam? Do you have a beef with someone or are you here for personal gains? Groovygeeks appears to own a new nitrous company, whya re you reverting to their edits where they removed and spammed the page. He removed an established long time company who is a manufacturer where he is not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.10 (talk • contribs) .
- I reverted the edits because they replaced links that were already in the article. I'll just remove the entire section, as they're all commercial linkspam. Naconkantari 14:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I believe you misunderstood the edits, that had already been fixed, you wound up removing the correct long standing links that were put back due to the spam and vandalism from groovygeeks, I watch this page quite a bit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.10 (talk • contribs) .
- Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for advertising. None of the links belong in the article because they go to commercial websites. Naconkantari 14:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
That page has been fine with no issues for 6 months. While something may not be a vehicle, they are useful links that explain and offer the exact topic of that page and they are all releveant links, you need to reconsider what you are doing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.12.116.10 (talk • contribs) .
Signpost updated for October 9th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 41 | 9 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:06, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
IP 64.235.102.2 blocked for vandalism
Naconkantari, please change your block of User talk:64.235.102.2 to be at least 1 week, as requested by the school board to which this high school belongs. I've documented the request on the IP's talk page. Thanks! --Stéphane Charette 18:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
La'o Hamutuk deleted. Why?
I'm fairly new to writing for Misplaced Pages, and wrote an article La'o Hamutuk about an organization in East Timor a couple of weeks ago. Now I find that you have deleted it, but I don't know why. What was wrong with it -- and how can it be fixed and restored? Thank you. Cscheiner 00:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please see WP:PROD for more details. Naconkantari 00:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Cory Lidle
Can you explain what you consider POV in this passage?
- "Possibly his most memorable achievement on the mound was as a starting pitcher for the Oakland Athletics in August 2002, when his 32 2/3-inning scoreless streak and one earned run for the month helped the A's win an AL-record 20 games in a row."
Thank you. ~ trialsanderrors 21:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- "Possibly his most memorable". Memorable to whom? Naconkantari 21:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- This doesn't warrant removal of the whole passage, which is easily sourceable (and I'm looking for the best source right now). ~ trialsanderrors 21:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- As the article is rapidly changing, please leave it out until it is sourced. Naconkantari 21:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- don't make me laugh. The article has all of three sources total. ~ trialsanderrors 21:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- sounds much better. Thanks Naconkantari 21:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- don't make me laugh. The article has all of three sources total. ~ trialsanderrors 21:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- As the article is rapidly changing, please leave it out until it is sourced. Naconkantari 21:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- This doesn't warrant removal of the whole passage, which is easily sourceable (and I'm looking for the best source right now). ~ trialsanderrors 21:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
OOPS
I didn't know I was breaking the info box. Sorry about that. XPrivateXRyanX 22:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
200.7.35.222
Oops it seems I warned him for you :) Glen 15:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for zapping that vandalism on my talk page! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! 15:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Gaijin
Why'd you just revert my (ongoing) edits to Gaijin? Please see the Talk page in question. Jpatokal 15:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I must have misread the diff. Naconkantari 15:41, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Laurentdion / Yakusudo conduct
I noticed that you had edited these user pages to revert some offensive comment. Yakusudo is a sockpuppet of Laurentdion, who also edits anonymously, and has since the early summer, been in a conflict with me and other users over deletion of an article about a work of art of his named Earthman. He had gone on a tear for a while after this deletion review didn't go the way he wanted it to, which wasn't helped by his offensive conduct during the process, demanding that his username be expunged from Misplaced Pages, and going so far as to edit a number of userpages to remove legitimate contect that noted his user identity: User:Bucketsofg, and User:Wildthing61476 as well as myself were the most frequent victims. Laurentdion had gone away for a while but popped up in the last couple of days to restart his odd campaign. I bought this up on this admin noticeboard page, and also here, and would appreciate your input. Richardjames444 16:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Balloonguy
Nacokantari, a couple of months ago you blocked User:Balloonguy on suspicion that he was a sockpuppet. Who did you suspect him of being? Jayjg 17:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Probably Mascotguy. Naconkantari 21:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Is that User:Mascotguy, or someone else? Jayjg 16:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Supreme_Cmdr
Nacokantari, please read my latest comment about being unblocked. Supreme_Cmdr 12:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Laurentdion/Yakusudo
I noticed that you just got visited and vandalized. Dion emailed me the copy that he posted here, although mine was a more complete version. I posted it on the Admin noticeboard: here or here I would really like some action taken in this matter. It's getting unhinged and weird, especially as the whole thing had been buried for months until the last couple of days, and is now much more extreme than it ever was previously when the actual issue was taking place. Richardjames444 17:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Wow!
- (Block log); 03:11 . . Naconkantari (Talk | contribs | block) (blocked "User:HALEY ISN'T HOT" with an expiry time of infinite: user...)
- (User creation log); 03:11 . . HALEY ISN'T HOT (Talk | contribs | block) (New user: Talk | contribs | block)
- (User creation log); 03:10 . . AIDSAIDSAIDSAIDS (Talk | contribs | block) (New user: Talk | contribs | block)
- (Block log); 03:10 . . Naconkantari (Talk | contribs | block) (blocked "User:AIDSAIDSAIDSAIDS" with an expiry time of infinite: user...)
- (Block log); 03:10 . . Naconkantari (Talk | contribs | block) (blocked "User:Shanel is gay on wheels!" with an expiry time of infinite: user...)
Congrats for having blocked an account before its creation! :)) And thank you for your great work, too. Just out of curiosity, which tool do you use to perform blocks so quickly? Korg (talk) 04:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I pretty much use pgkbot as my primary tool. It's just that good. :) Naconkantari 04:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks! Keep up the good work. Korg (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 16th.
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 42 | 16 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
User:Ericlewis91
This is me, and you have my ip adress and im sorry for my son which vandalized the ipod page and this was my son who is 13 and is very sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ericlewis91 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, thanks for those reverts. Is there any way you can delete the edits from the history? (especially on the talk pages that hardly have any in the first place) Thanks again. —Khoikhoi 14:30, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't remove comments from my talk page
I'm smart enough to recognize vote-stacking when I see it, and I can act appropriately without your "help". Additionally, you removed comments by the same party about an unrelated matter from the page, which would have been a serious inconvenience to me if I hadn't already seen them. -Hit bull, win steak 14:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I removed their comments from many talk pages using admin rollback. I apologise if this caused you any inconvenience. Naconkantari 14:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
JennyCanuck
- Hey there, thanks for taking care of JennyCanuck and the IP User:67.71.85.145. Just so you're aware, it's pretty clear that JennyCanuck is more than just a username vio, the fact that his first and only edits were to the Hockey Hall of Fame and Vaughan Election make it pretty clear that it's JohhnyCanuck. If the IP is in fact JennyCanuck not logged in, it should probably be indef blocked to per WP:SOCK. Though i'm still crossing my fingers that it's all a big mistake and he's not coming back... (/wishful thinking). -- Chabuk 16:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- You can probably add User:67.70.148.23 to that list as well. Note the same IP range and identical edit as the user's only edit. Again violating WP:SOCK. -- Chabuk 17:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Moe
I was trying to ask him for proof of what he claimed of me, but refuses to do so or admit that the claims are false. Since when is that a blockable offense and lying not? - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh please. I just now responded to you on your talk page. You didn't give me but 1 minute to respond. — Moe 20:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
This is a blockable offense, regardless of what he did. Naconkantari 20:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- To ask for proof is a blockable offense? I've never seen anyone blocked for it. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm referring to the edit summary. Naconkantari 20:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- The edit summary may not have been civil, but Moe made false statements about me and refuses to accept that what he said was false. I don't let people make up stuff about me, especially negative stuff. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I never made up anything about you, just leave me alone already. — Moe 20:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- The edit summary may not have been civil, but Moe made false statements about me and refuses to accept that what he said was false. I don't let people make up stuff about me, especially negative stuff. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm referring to the edit summary. Naconkantari 20:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of Andy Stephenson article
I see that you were the closing administrator for the Andy Stephenson article, and you deleted it. Is an administrator assigned an article for closing review or did you choose to be the one? And how did you arrive at the decision that the article did not reach WP:BIO? I understand that it is not a vote, but ignoring SPAs I count 20 for keep and 25 for deletion. How is it determined that a consensus for deletion is achieved? As for notability, the subject had multiple mainstream media coverage of his work on black box voting as I mentioned 07:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC): He is in an HBO movie, there were 3 articles cited from the Seattle Weekly and other west coast publications, he is in articles cited from the New York Times, the Washington Post and The Guardian (London),plus a story on Fox News. Several of these mention his national campaign for voter verified paper trails and his Secretary of State candidacy. Many Misplaced Pages bio articles have far less national or international coverage of notability. So please advise me as to how he failed WP:BIO. Also, many of those favoring deletion suggested that any mention of him be in the Black Box Voting article. How do I get a copy of the deleted article to use the references in improving the Blavk Box Voting article? Thank you for your efforts to improve Misplaced Pages.Edison 07:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)