| Revision as of 21:52, 10 December 2004 editRmhermen (talk | contribs)Administrators62,561 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:27, 10 December 2004 edit undoMikerussell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,787 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| --] 21:36, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) | --] 21:36, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) | ||
| :That material should go in the ] article where in fact it already is. This article is to be a general article with world-wide applicability. ] 21:52, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC) | :That material should go in the ] article where in fact it already is. This article is to be a general article with world-wide applicability. ] 21:52, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| Okay, I see what you have done. I am sorry if I got snotty. | |||
| --] 22:27, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:27, 10 December 2004
Why would you revert my page back to the old page by Noisy?
- I am trying to integrate parts of it into the article. However much of it is not necessary or should be in another article like library. See what I have done now. Rmhermen 21:11, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
Are you a librarian? Your edit is not very good. Who does someone go to to complain about your judgement and editorial merits, or lack of them? I thought this was suppose to be a USER supported service? By what criteria do apply your editorial judgement? I think important information in the Librarian category is missing. A person who is interested in BECOMING a librarian may want to know about the settings of librarians. Over all, a horrible edit. --Mikerussell 21:36, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- That material should go in the library article where in fact it already is. This article is to be a general article with world-wide applicability. Rmhermen 21:52, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
Okay, I see what you have done. I am sorry if I got snotty. --Mikerussell 22:27, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)