Misplaced Pages

User talk:Thewolfchild: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:03, 30 March 2018 editPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits →Talk:Royal Marines: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:04, 30 March 2018 edit undoPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits →Talk:Royal MarinesNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:


On ] you wrote "you are allowed to do, but Garuda28 can revert you if he feels the edit warrants a discussion" (). On ] you wrote "you are allowed to do, but Garuda28 can revert you if he feels the edit warrants a discussion" ().
#If one reverts a bold edit one has to have a verified reason for doing so. Did you read what I posted to explain why reverting a bold edit because you think someone else may object to it is considered to be detrimental to the project (] and see also the wording of ] Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus")". #If one reverts a bold edit one has to have a verified reason for doing so. Did you read what I posted to explain why reverting a bold edit because you think someone else may object to it is considered to be detrimental to the project (]) and see also the wording of ] "Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus")".
#I did not revert, I started a section on the talk page pointing out to sections in guidance and I asked was there any reason for not reverting (IE I was following ]). #I did not revert, I started a section on the talk page pointing out to sections in guidance and I asked was there any reason for not reverting (IE I was following ]).


Revision as of 21:04, 30 March 2018



23:52 UTC
refresh
The
Cult		"I'm thewolfchild, girl, howlin' for you,
Wild Flower..." - Electric
Note: If I posted a comment on your talk page, replied to you on an article or user talk page, or if you have a
message regarding an article, please post it there, not here. (and don't forget to {{ping}}) Thank you - Wolf
Archives
- all comments will be archived immediately after viewing -


Talk:Royal Marines

On Talk:Royal Marines you wrote "you are allowed to do, but Garuda28 can revert you if he feels the edit warrants a discussion" (diff 19:56, 30 March 2018).

  1. If one reverts a bold edit one has to have a verified reason for doing so. Did you read what I posted to explain why reverting a bold edit because you think someone else may object to it is considered to be detrimental to the project (Misplaced Pages:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus"#Especially) and see also the wording of WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE "Editors who revert a change proposed by an edit should generally avoid terse explanations (such as "against consensus")".
  2. I did not revert, I started a section on the talk page pointing out to sections in guidance and I asked was there any reason for not reverting (IE I was following BRD).

Reverting a revert under such circumstances in not edit warring. On the other-hand you posting to the article talk page was off topic. If you wished to make such an observation the place to do it was my talk page. "Comment on content, not on the contributor" (WP:TPYES) -- PBS (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)