| Revision as of 21:19, 5 April 2018 editTronald-Drumpf (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:19, 5 April 2018 edit undoTronald-Drumpf (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''merge to '']''''' When there's a not-that-long, current controversy article that's about the same length as its parent, there's no need for two articles. ] (]) 21:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | *'''merge to '']''''' When there's a not-that-long, current controversy article that's about the same length as its parent, there's no need for two articles. ] (]) 21:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (]). ] (]) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (]). ] (]) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. | *'''Keep''' There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. ] (]) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 5 April 2018
Boycott of The Ingraham Angle
- Boycott of The Ingraham Angle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an event that happened in the news about news. Misplaced Pages is WP:NOTNEWS. Article has no encyclopedic value on its own and basically amounts to a gossip piece. Could be merged with David Hogg and/or Laura Ingraham but those articles already have content on this minor event. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:43, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT applies.--MONGO 18:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge the relevant parts to the Hogg and Ingraham articles. Per WP:NOTNEWS, the boycott is relevant to the people involved but does not have sufficient enduring notability for its own article. -- irn (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTNEWS, as per above. One too many articles are being created about the gun violence protests now. Werehilly (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. The peak of this article is the "List of advertisers in boycott" section. It currently contains only one source. If we merge this anywhere, I believe that this stand-alone list would not be included on any other article. wumbolo ^^^ 20:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article is well sourced, with multiple points of view, and is not gossip, but a serious boycott of a nationwide television news show. Wasabi,the,one (talk)
- merge to The Ingraham Angle When there's a not-that-long, current controversy article that's about the same length as its parent, there's no need for two articles. Mangoe (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (List of controversies involving Laura Ingraham). Acnetj (talk) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. Tronald-Drumpf (talk) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)