| Revision as of 21:56, 8 May 2018 editDave Dial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,118 edits rmv template← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:48, 9 May 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,300,268 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Dave Dial/Archive 12) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| == Border == | |||
| Re , what's that border thing supposed to do anyway? The guy isn't very responsive on his UTP. ―] ] 19:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{yo|Mandruss}}You can't even tell it's there. If you zoom in, there is a small gray border outline that can't be seen if you're not looking for it. But it causes errors in HTML mouseover codes. He's been told numerous times about it, I had thought he stopped doing it. But you're right, he almost never responds to other editors and just keeps making edit after edit. ] (]) 19:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sheesh. Yeah I remember running into that from him 2-3 years ago, I just forgot what he told me about it. If it's causing errors, and he's removing other stuff like that scaling to make it work, it's a significant behavior problem and he needs a ban from doing it. Not that I'm the guy to raise that, of course. ―] ] 19:51, 19 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::He agreed to stop doing it at ]. But I've been gone from the project for the most part for a year or so. I would rather he just stopped, than go back there. ] (]) 20:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == CIA is a trustworthy source == | == CIA is a trustworthy source == | ||
Revision as of 03:48, 9 May 2018
| This is Dave Dial's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
CIA is a trustworthy source
Hi Dave,
why do you delete the information, that the Vatican is an absolute monarchy? The source is the CIA's factbook which is supposed to be a trustworthy source. Please explain:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/print_vt.html
--CarlPhilippTrump.me (talk) 22:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Involuntary celibacy
First of all, thanks for all the work you're doing over at Involuntary celibacy. I know you weren't thrilled with the way I created it, but I am very grateful for your efforts in keeping the quality up. Second, I just saw this edit: do you have a source you could add? The current one does say it's alleged. Again, thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hey GW, no prob and I appreciate the work you are doing on the article too. As for the edit and "allegedly" being added, the very first source states he made the post and it was verified by Facebook reps. I do not see any ambiguity in their reporting on whether Minassian made the FB post. Dave Dial (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- (Add ping)@GorillaWarfare: Dave Dial (talk) 04:59, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you (and thanks for the ping—I'm bad at watchlisting where I post on talk pages). I threw in an inline cite to that reference just so it's clearer. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good and no prob! Dave Dial (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you (and thanks for the ping—I'm bad at watchlisting where I post on talk pages). I threw in an inline cite to that reference just so it's clearer. GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Request from disruptive editor
Please stay off my talk page in the future, thanks. Magnacartalibertatum (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Stop removing sourced content and inserting repetitive and unnecessary wording. Use the Talk page for changes. Dave Dial (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Stay off my talk page, thanks. Magnacartalibertatum (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I guess it is too late now
I was hoping you could give him a chance to respond, before opening that discussion. It is a more friendly approach. Anyways I was trying to restore a history concept, but after your link from incel.me I wish I never got involved. Regardless, I still believe we have two topics here, but I think the article was fine where was. Even though I voted for the move, I thought there was a consensus against its move. Valoem 21:35, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yea Valoem, I'm about to forget the page exists pretty soon. Might be too much drama for me. I just got back from a long break a month or two ago. I think I'll occasionally edit controversial articles, but maybe not delve too far into them. I think things are going to get worse on that article, much like the Trump article(which I mostly stay away from too). Good luck! Dave Dial (talk) 21:55, 8 May 2018 (UTC)