| Revision as of 21:25, 24 October 2006 editStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,067 edits →Indefinitely blocked: unblocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:53, 27 October 2006 edit undoPanarjedde (talk | contribs)3,432 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| :There was no consensus; the user is pushing a POV based on bald assertions regarding the existence of some universal "Roman Pagan" faith that supposedly existed in the 4th century. He has offered no evidence for his position, while there are reams of modern scholarship confirming the usage in my most recent edit. His idea of "consensus" is that nobody was willing to get into an edit/revert war with him. ] 20:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Dppowel, I was referring to the "Pagan" vs. "non-Christian" matter. Which is what ( )--] 20:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Furthermore, it looks like your last edit confirmed most of ''my'' last edit, the one I was blocked for. | |||
| :::All I did was change the capitals to reflect academic usage. The "pagan vs non-Christian" label debate is separate, and I haven't significantly involved myself in it to this point. ] 21:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| --] 20:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Right, but in the edits of mine you posted, I was reverting the "non-Christian" vs. "Pagan" matter, not the "pagan" vs. "Pagan" one, as you were referring.--] 21:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::It's a shame that you can't play by Misplaced Pages's rules, because you have clearly made some worthwhile contributions to articles. You just seem to have a hard time believing that others' viewpoints might sometimes be more appropriate for encyclopedic content, and you are seemingly unable to restrain yourself from forcibly asserting your POV. If you ever return from your block, please reconsider this approach. ] 14:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div> | |||
| <!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 24 hours. ] 19:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| ==Unfair block== | |||
| I wish to apologize for blocking you yesterday, as you correctly pointed out you made four reverts but it was outside the 24 hour limit. As soon as your current block expires I will make a note in your block log that the block was not correct. ] (]) 21:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Indefinitely blocked == | |||
| As you have admitted to being a sock puppet of a banned user at ], you are also blocked indefinitely. ] (]) 21:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Due to the personal representations of ] and ], I have unblocked you for the time being. ] (]) 21:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC) | |||