| Revision as of 01:23, 28 October 2006 editUberCryxic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,162 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:14, 28 October 2006 edit undoUberCryxic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,162 edits →FN Charles de GaulleNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Hey I just wanted to clarify something. Right now you have a vote under Keep and Neutral. Is there any particular stance that you prefer over the other? It might not be a good precedent to have votes under two different categories, though I'm not implying that it's against a strawpoll's rules or something. I just wanted to make sure. Thank you.] 01:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | Hey I just wanted to clarify something. Right now you have a vote under Keep and Neutral. Is there any particular stance that you prefer over the other? It might not be a good precedent to have votes under two different categories, though I'm not implying that it's against a strawpoll's rules or something. I just wanted to make sure. Thank you.] 01:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Hey great idea! I like your compromise.] 02:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:14, 28 October 2006
NOTE: Most comments will be deleted by me after one week. Also, if you are discussing an article, I would prefer to use that article's talk page. Please limit this page to discussions not related to any particular article, if possible. Thanks.
FN Charles de Gaulle
Looks like the discussion is running in circles. My primary concern is that the article gets 'locked-up' while we wait for Misplaced Pages's rules and policies on content submission to be enforced.
- Hey, to answer your inquiry in the talk page, yes the Journal of Electronic defense is an independent and very prestigious publication that comments on the joint Franco-American operation in its August 2002 article, "It Takes Two to Interoperate."UberCryxic 23:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi BillCJ, I removed your comment to Elaragirl on hte straw-poll section because I could not keep the counter working otherwise. Can you place your text elsewhere please. Sorry for editing you. :-) Natobxl 00:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey I just wanted to clarify something. Right now you have a vote under Keep and Neutral. Is there any particular stance that you prefer over the other? It might not be a good precedent to have votes under two different categories, though I'm not implying that it's against a strawpoll's rules or something. I just wanted to make sure. Thank you.UberCryxic 01:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey great idea! I like your compromise.UberCryxic 02:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)