Misplaced Pages

Template:Did you know nominations/Cockroach farming: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Did you know nominations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:03, 4 June 2018 editYoninah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers136,224 edits q← Previous edit Revision as of 22:24, 5 June 2018 edit undoVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 edits I see what you're sayingNext edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
:*] I reworded a few spots on the page that still were pretty close, which Nikkimaria mentioned. I added an in-line citation for the six billion figure (all potential DYK hook information in an article should have a citation immediately following it). I approve all three hooks. I think ALT2 is the funniest. ] (]) 17:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC) :*] I reworded a few spots on the page that still were pretty close, which Nikkimaria mentioned. I added an in-line citation for the six billion figure (all potential DYK hook information in an article should have a citation immediately following it). I approve all three hooks. I think ALT2 is the funniest. ] (]) 17:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
::*] Can we get rid of the nation-centric focus by renaming the page ]? ] (]) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC) ::*] Can we get rid of the nation-centric focus by renaming the page ]? ] (]) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
:::*I'm not fully in favour of that because it might discourage people from adding things about developments outside of China. I think that it would be better at this more general name but I'm willing to concede that if it satisfies people here. ]&nbsp;<sub><sup>]]</sup></sub> 22:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:24, 5 June 2018

DYK toolbox

Cockroach farming

( ) An American cockroach (Periplaneta americana)An American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) Numerous cockroaches on logsNumerous cockroaches on logs

Created by Violetriga (talk). Self-nominated at 16:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, and neutral. Hook is verified with reliable source. QPQ is done. Image is freely licensed. One minor paraphrasing issue needs to be fixed: "40 million people have been cured of a variety of ailments by taking the potion on prescription" is too close to the source. -Zanhe (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  • A good spot, thanks. Rewritten as "According to a government report, more than 40 million people have been cured of "a variety of ailments" after being prescribed the potion." I don't want to deviate too much from what the source says as it is a little vague. Is that sufficient a change? If not I'll take another look. violet/riga  21:39, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Looks good now. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 05:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I came to promote this, but while it's a very interesting article, the article seems to give overwhelming weight towards China. Could some information be included here about cockroach farming in other countries? Narutolovehinata5 02:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
    • I've done what I can to balance the article. It is very much a Chinese industry at the moment so sources away from that region are difficult to find. violet/riga  18:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Noted. Since there's nothing that can be done on that end, I'm restoring Zanhe's tick. Narutolovehinata5 03:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm concerned that much of the article is closely paraphrased from its sources. Compare for example "seeing it as a cheap source of protein as well as the cellulose-like substance on their wings" with "value the insects as a cheap source of protein as well as for the cellulose-like substance on their wings", or "Cockroaches, like all insects, are not susceptible to the same diseases as mammals or poultry are, and are notoriously hardy" and "Notoriously hearty, roaches aren't susceptible to the same diseases as farm animals". Nikkimaria (talk) 12:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
    • @Nikkimaria: this has been attended to. violet/riga  14:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
      • Definitely better, still a bit of work needed. Compare for example "has widely expanded gene families related to taste and smell, to detoxification and to immunity" with "having expanded gene families related to detoxification and immunity". Nikkimaria (talk) 15:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
        • Thank you for your diligence. I have attended to this. violet/riga  11:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Looking for a second opinion on the changes. Nikkimaria (talk) 11:51, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I have removed the tag because as far as I can see there is no longer a problem, although it is difficult to be certain with close paraphrasing. Could I suggest a new hook
  • ALT2 ... that over a million cockroaches escaped when an unregulated cockroach farm building was bulldozed while the owner was at lunch? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 6:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
  • I reworded a few spots on the page that still were pretty close, which Nikkimaria mentioned. I added an in-line citation for the six billion figure (all potential DYK hook information in an article should have a citation immediately following it). I approve all three hooks. I think ALT2 is the funniest. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm not fully in favour of that because it might discourage people from adding things about developments outside of China. I think that it would be better at this more general name but I'm willing to concede that if it satisfies people here. violet/riga  22:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Category: