| Revision as of 19:32, 6 June 2018 editKanbei85 (talk | contribs)215 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:28, 7 June 2018 edit undoHob Gadling (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,466 edits opposeNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Proposed deletion/dated | |||
| |concern = WP:NOTE, WP:NPOV This is not a commonly-used phrase (outside the anti-theistic online community) and is a personal disparagement of Duane Gish. | |||
| |timestamp = 20180606192656 | |||
| |help = | |||
| }} | |||
| "'''Gish gallop'''" is a technique used during ] that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. | "'''Gish gallop'''" is a technique used during ] that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. | ||
Revision as of 07:28, 7 June 2018
"Gish gallop" is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.
The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish, who used the technique frequently against science-based opponents on the topic of evolution.
Technique and counter measures
During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place. The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially, if no independent fact-checking is involved, or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.
Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one. If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.
See also
Notes
- Scott 2004, p. 23
- Scott 1994
- Hayward 2015, p. 67
- Grant 2011, p. 74
- Johnson 2017, p. 14-15
- Grant 2015, p. 55
References
- Grant, John (2011). Denying Science: Conspiracy Theories, Media Distortions, and the War Against Reality. Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781616144005.
- Grant, John (2015). Debunk it: How to Stay Sane in a World of Misinformation. San Francisco: Zest Books. ISBN 978-1-936976-68-3.
- Hayward, C.J.S. (2015). The Seraphinians: '"Blessed Seraphim Rose" and His Axe-Wielding Western Converts. The Collected Works of C.J.S. Hayward. San Francisco: Zest Books.
- Johnson, Amy (2017). Gasser, Urs (ed.). "The Multiple Harms of Sea Lions" (PDF). Perspectives on Harmful Speech Online. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. p. 14.
- Scott, Eugenie (2004). Confronting Creationism. Reports of National Center for Science Education. Vol. 24/6.
- Scott, Eugenie (1994). "Debates and the Globetrotters". Talk Origins Archive. Retrieved 2017-10-06.