Misplaced Pages

Gish gallop: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:49, 7 June 2018 editTronvillain (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,186 edits cr: rf format← Previous edit Revision as of 01:43, 8 June 2018 edit undoJbhunley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,645 edits AFD closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the discussion has been closed. -->
{{Article for deletion/dated|page=Gish gallop|timestamp=20180607123300|year=2018|month=June|day=7|substed=yes}}
<!-- Once discussion is closed, please place on talk page: {{Old AfD multi|page=Gish gallop|date=7 June 2018|result='''keep'''}} -->
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
"'''Gish gallop'''" is a technique used during ] that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments. "'''Gish gallop'''" is a technique used during ] that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.



Revision as of 01:43, 8 June 2018

"Gish gallop" is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming one's opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments.

The term was coined by Eugenie C. Scott and named after the creationist Duane T. Gish, who she claimed used the technique frequently against opponents on the topic of evolution.

Technique and counter measures

During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place. The technique wastes an opponent's time and may cast doubt on the opponent's debating ability for an audience unfamiliar with the technique, especially, if no independent fact-checking is involved, or, if the audience has limited knowledge of the topics.

Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than in a free-form one. If a debater is familiar with an opponent who is known to use the Gish gallop, the technique may be countered by preempting and refuting the opponent's commonly used arguments first, before the opponent has an opportunity to launch into a Gish gallop.

See also

Notes

  1. Scott 2004, p. 23
  2. Scott 1994
  3. Logan 2000, p. 4
  4. Hayward 2015, p. 67
  5. Grant 2011, p. 74
  6. Johnson 2017, p. 14-15
  7. Grant 2015, p. 55

References

Propaganda techniques
Categories: