| Revision as of 05:06, 24 June 2018 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits →Bolding AFD !votes: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 05:09, 24 June 2018 edit undoJames500 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers80,304 edits Delete battleground comment.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → |
| Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
{{paragraph break}} |
|
{{paragraph break}} |
|
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings1}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}} |
|
:<div style="float:left">''{{resize|88%|Spread the WikiLove; use {{tls|Season's Greetings1}} to send this message}}''</div>{{-}} |
|
|
|
|
== '''Bolding''' AFD !votes == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, when I looked at the page history to see you'd blanked my last message, I noticed . AFD may not be a vote, but when you cast "keep" !votes anyway, you really should '''write them in boldface'''. One of the reasons being that the automatically-generated AFD stats for users can't track your stats as easily: you appear to have edited some 552 AFDs a total of (up to?) 2,272 times, and yet the tool can only recognize 4 !votes you have made, all "keep".<!-- "wikipedia:articles for deletion/" gives 901 results, but the 349 results for "wikipedia:articles for deletion/log" need to be subtracted --><!-- "wikipedia:articles for deletion/" gives 2,272 results --> |
|
|
|
|
|
Doing this gives the impression that you are trying to cover whatever patterns might be detected in your edits, as any individual AFD closer will notice, for example, whose prose text begins "Keep and improve." and count it, but figuring out whether you automatically !vote "keep" regardless of the evidence or arguments in any individual AFD is a lot more difficult. Could you perhaps link to any recent AFD where you !voted "delete" or "redirect"? |
|
|
|
|
|
] (<small>]]</small>) 05:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)