Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:: ??? PolitiFact is a RS. ] (]) 01:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
:: ??? PolitiFact is a RS. ] (]) 01:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
:::I said another. We don't need to add Politifact's analysis to every claim. ]<sup>(])</sup> 01:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
:::I said another. We don't need to add Politifact's analysis to every claim. ]<sup>(])</sup> 01:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
== Undue weight ==
This article reads less as a bio on Fitton and more like an article on Judicial Watch. That needs to be remedied. '''<span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span>''' ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 10:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Revision as of 10:17, 1 August 2018
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
The article is clearly biased against conservative viewpoints and conservative action groups. Either eliminate it or do a lot of work to show a balanced picture.Danleywolfe (talk) 17:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
It has gotten even more so since you posted your comment in July 2014. A quick read of the "Controversy" section shows it to be pure garbage, written in a manner that is designed to be as venomous as possible without technically stepping over the line. That kind of writing should be taken to private 'blog sites and not posted at Misplaced Pages. — Quicksilver (Hydrargyrum)20:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Fitton's claims about voter fraud are "alarmist", and should be described as such. Fitton's idiotic claims about climate change amount to a "rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change", and should be described as such. This is consistent with WP:FRINGE where Misplaced Pages editors should identify fringe theories as such. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Your tone is extremely POV. This is not RationalWiki for such bias. This is violation of BLP:Tone and BLP:Coatrack. Please find Reliable Sources for the "alarmist" claim and we can add it to the article. If it's so obviously "alarmist" then there must be RS to confirm this claim, otherwise it remains POV and Original Research and also BLP violation. FreedomGonzo (talk) 02:55, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Fact-checkers are in agreement that there is zero evidence that voter fraud is "widespread, and substantial to the point that it can decide elections." To describe Fitton's remark as "alarmist" is to be extra gentle, because the claim is straight-up "false". Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Do any of the sources talk about Fitton or not? It seems your actions are of a political activist, not an editor of Encyclopedia. I, personally, couldn't care less about Fitton or American right-wingers, let them burn in hell for all I care, but I don't want Misplaced Pages to turn to biased and opinionated trash like Conservapedia or Rationalwiki. A good way to show his claims are false, would be adding something like: "These claims, however, have been proven false" and then add all these sources, you provided above, rather than childish "this person is evil" style of writing, which simply unencyclopedic. FreedomGonzo (talk) 03:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Whether the sources are about Fitton or not is irrelevant. Per WP:FRINGE, our language should reflect when something is fringe (e.g. when someone makes false claims about climate change). We don't just repeat falsehoods without clarifying to readers that they are false. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Actually, the new edit you've done looks much more encyclopaedic and well-sourced, and less opinionated. I think this disagreement actually helped improve the article. FreedomGonzo (talk) 03:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
I've removed "alarmist". As FreedomGonzo noted, unless reliable sources describe his claims about voter fraud as such, we should leave it out. Meatsgains00:56, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
One editor removed PolitiFact's finding that Fitton lied about the Obama administration, opting instead to just leave Fitton's lies standing without any correction. Can the editor explain the thinking behind this edit?Snooganssnoogans (talk) 07:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
I removed content noting that "PolitiFact rated Fitton's claim 'mostly false.'" Can this be confirmed from another RS? Meatsgains01:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
