| Revision as of 12:31, 13 August 2018 editChetsford (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators40,337 edits sort← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:35, 13 August 2018 edit undoNewimpartial (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,847 edits →Fantasy Imperium: Improper nomNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Article has just passed the 13 year mark without a single source. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find any RS. ] applies. ] (]) 12:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | Article has just passed the 13 year mark without a single source. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find any RS. ] applies. ] (]) 12:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)</small> | ||
| '''Improper nom by clueless editor''' The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion. | |||
| Nom doesn't even understand the FANCRUFT essay. That's pretty clueless. ] (]) 15:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:35, 13 August 2018
Fantasy Imperium
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Fantasy Imperium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has just passed the 13 year mark without a single source. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com fails to find any RS. WP:FANCRUFT applies. Chetsford (talk) 12:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 12:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego" . Nobody who does not understand the text of a Misplaced Pages article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion.
Nom doesn't even understand the FANCRUFT essay. That's pretty clueless. Newimpartial (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Categories: