Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wild beasts: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:46, 3 November 2006 editObiterDicta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,874 edits []: +d← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 4 November 2006 edit undoRyan Postlethwaite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,432 edits []Next edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Delete''' per above. --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 23:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above. --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 23:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Non-notable band that fails ]. ] 00:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Non-notable band that fails ]. ] 00:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
*Could you please all let me know how I could make this page not suitable for deletion? could I add references to it for music reviews? This band aren't just another band. They have been signed by a record label (bad sneakers records), but only in August. Would it be permisable to include neutral online reviews as part of the page to eradicate this problem?

Revision as of 18:23, 4 November 2006

Wild beasts

Disputed prod. Non-notable band. -- RHaworth 01:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)