Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Ecopath: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:28, 6 November 2006 editJuJube (talk | contribs)44,091 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 02:36, 6 November 2006 edit undoXdenizen (talk | contribs)Rollbackers7,418 edits []Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
*'''Delete''' as unsourced. Google suggests this is a term which does not have any standard definition—I get many hits for a certain software, some for the path of fish in the sea, etc. ] 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as unsourced. Google suggests this is a term which does not have any standard definition—I get many hits for a certain software, some for the path of fish in the sea, etc. ] 13:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per nom. ] 01:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] 02:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:36, 6 November 2006

Ecopath

Ecopath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Neologisms shouldn't have articles based on them. The term is fictitious and doesn't have a source (i.e. no fictional character is ever described in context as being an "ecopath". I believe the term was invented to parrallel technopath, but regardless, it's all OR/a user's own invention. ~Zythe 13:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Categories: