Misplaced Pages

Constance Garnett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:30, 23 October 2006 editSchöner (talk | contribs)99 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:50, 6 November 2006 edit undoMandel (talk | contribs)4,917 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Constance Clara Garnett''' (née '''Black''') (], ] - ], ]) was an English translator whose translations of ] ]n classics first introduced them on a wide basis to the English public. Garnett is also the first English translator of ] and ]. '''Constance Clara Garnett''' (née '''Black''') (], ] - ], ]) was an English translator whose translations of ] ]n classics first introduced them on a wide basis to the English public. Garnett is also the first English translator of ] and ].


Born in ], Garnett studied ] and ] at ], where she also learned ], and worked shortly as a school teacher. In ], shortly after a visit to ] and ] during which she met ], she started translating ], which became her life's passion and resulted in English-language versions of dozens of volumes by Tolstoy, ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. Born in ], Garnett studied ] and ] at ], where she also learned ] (partly from emigre Russian friends ), and worked shortly as a school teacher. In ], shortly after a visit to ] and ] during which she met ], she started translating ], which became her life's passion and resulted in English-language versions of dozens of volumes by Tolstoy, ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].


Her husband, ], was a distinguished reader for the publisher ]. Her son, ], trained as a biologist and later wrote novels. Her husband, ], was a distinguished reader for the publisher ]. Her son, ], trained as a biologist and later wrote novels.


Constance Garnett's translations of Russian classics were highly acclaimed in her time and, despite some complaints about their being outdated, are still being reprinted today. (Most of the books she translated happen to also be in ].) While Garnett kept close to the syntax and vocabulary of the original, she occasionally excised certain portions liberally, as in her translations of Dostoevsky. It is sometimes claimed that she "retold Russian literature in Victorian English"; this is not strictly true, as the English she used is fairly modern during her times and is thus more reflective of the ] era rather than the Victorian. However, due to Garnett’s not being natively Russian, she may have miscalculated when translating a few particular Russian words. For example, her translations have the word "Mass" in place of the proper name for the service of the ], which is ] or simply ]. These problems have largely been solved by the translations of ] and ]. Volokhonsky is a native Russian and is perhaps able to approach the text with a firmer grasp of nuance. Constance Garnett's translations of Russian classics were highly acclaimed in her time and, despite some complaints about their being outdated, are still being reprinted today. (Most of the books she translated happen to also be in ].) While Garnett kept close to the syntax and vocabulary of the original, she occasionally excised and smoothed over certain portions for readibility, as in her translations of Dostoevsky.<ref>See Rachel May, ''The Translator in the Text: On Reading Russian Literature in English'', pp 32-33</ref>It is sometimes claimed that she "retold Russian literature in Victorian English"; this is not strictly true, as the English she used is fairly modern during her times and is thus more reflective of the ] era rather than the Victorian. However, due to Garnett’s not being natively Russian, she may have miscalculated when translating a few particular Russian words. For example, her translations have the word "Mass" in place of the proper name for the service of the ], which is ] or simply ]. These problems have largely been solved by the translations of ] and ]. Volokhonsky is a native Russian and is perhaps able to approach the text with a firmer grasp of nuance.


Still, Constance Garnett remains the standard text in English of many Russian classics of the nineteenth century, and many merits of her work have of late been perhaps underappreciated. Still, Constance Garnett remains the standard text in English of many Russian classics of the nineteenth century, and many merits of her work have of late been perhaps underappreciated.

==References==
<references/>
Rachel May, ''The Translator in the Text: On Reading Russian Literature in English''





Revision as of 10:50, 6 November 2006

Constance Clara Garnett (née Black) (December 19, 1861 - December 17, 1946) was an English translator whose translations of nineteenth-century Russian classics first introduced them on a wide basis to the English public. Garnett is also the first English translator of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Anton Chekhov.

Born in Brighton, Garnett studied Latin and Greek at Newnham College, Cambridge, where she also learned Russian (partly from emigre Russian friends ), and worked shortly as a school teacher. In 1893, shortly after a visit to Moscow and Petersburg during which she met Leo Tolstoy, she started translating Russian literature, which became her life's passion and resulted in English-language versions of dozens of volumes by Tolstoy, Gogol, Goncharov, Dostoevsky, Pushkin, Turgenev, Ostrovsky and Chekhov.

Her husband, Edward Garnett, was a distinguished reader for the publisher Jonathan Cape. Her son, David Garnett, trained as a biologist and later wrote novels.

Constance Garnett's translations of Russian classics were highly acclaimed in her time and, despite some complaints about their being outdated, are still being reprinted today. (Most of the books she translated happen to also be in public domain.) While Garnett kept close to the syntax and vocabulary of the original, she occasionally excised and smoothed over certain portions for readibility, as in her translations of Dostoevsky.It is sometimes claimed that she "retold Russian literature in Victorian English"; this is not strictly true, as the English she used is fairly modern during her times and is thus more reflective of the Edwardian era rather than the Victorian. However, due to Garnett’s not being natively Russian, she may have miscalculated when translating a few particular Russian words. For example, her translations have the word "Mass" in place of the proper name for the service of the Orthodox Church, which is Divine Liturgy or simply Liturgy. These problems have largely been solved by the translations of Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky. Volokhonsky is a native Russian and is perhaps able to approach the text with a firmer grasp of nuance.

Still, Constance Garnett remains the standard text in English of many Russian classics of the nineteenth century, and many merits of her work have of late been perhaps underappreciated.

References

  1. See Rachel May, The Translator in the Text: On Reading Russian Literature in English, pp 32-33

Rachel May, The Translator in the Text: On Reading Russian Literature in English


External link

Categories: