| Revision as of 18:15, 6 November 2006 editPanarjedde (talk | contribs)3,432 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:17, 6 November 2006 edit undoKingjeff (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users87,419 edits revert bad faith noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| I hope you realize that this image is a bad faith nomination by another user. ] 23:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC) | I hope you realize that this image is a bad faith nomination by another user. ] 23:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I don't. Could you elaborate on that? --] 23:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC) | :I don't. Could you elaborate on that? --] 23:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| {{npa2}}--] 18:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:17, 6 November 2006
Panarjedde
Let's give him some rest. I seem it has behaved not so bad in the last times. I think more blatant crimes (3RR, disruptions, etc) should be found. Let me know. --Attilios 23:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
RfC procedure
Hi, regarding the AMA case, I think a RfC could be appropriate. In order for this to be valid, the users certifying the complaint are required to demonstrate their attempts to resolve the dispute. In this context, I would suggest you leave a note on Panarjedde's talk page outlining in what areas he could improve. Thanks, Addhoc 14:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you do, please put it under User talk:Panarjedde/Warnings and blocks. Thanks.--Panarjedde 14:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Ottl ima 010805.jpg
I hope you realize that this image is a bad faith nomination by another user. Kingjeff 23:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't. Could you elaborate on that? --Abu Badali 23:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)