Talk:Brisbane: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:21, 22 October 2018 editCaltraser55 (talk \| contribs)338 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:38, 22 October 2018 edit undoMichael Bednarek (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users85,148 editsm Undid revision 865136750 by Caltraser55 (talk): do not remove other editors' contributions.Tag: Undo Next edit →
Line 116:		Line 116:
	I've added the traditional name for Brisbane in the Yagerra language, however there is no pronunciation guide. This would probably need an expert! I've just used the two pronunciations given on the State Library website. It may make sense to include this in the info box too.		I've added the traditional name for Brisbane in the Yagerra language, however there is no pronunciation guide. This would probably need an expert! I've just used the two pronunciations given on the State Library website. It may make sense to include this in the info box too.
	] (]) 04:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)		] (]) 04:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

			== Brisbane as part of the Asia-Pacific ==

			{{ping\|Caltraser55}} I have again reverted your edits in relation to Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific. As I have previously discussed, does describe the current state of affairs but what the Qld Govt would like them to be. Now does your asserting something without citation make it rue. Futhermore, the bulk of the article (of which the lede paragraphs are supposed to be summarising) says relatively little about Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific. Can I suggest that instead of dumping largely uncited claims in the lede paragraphs, you focus on adding suitably-cited content on Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific in other sections of the article. Those claims should be factual ones. For example, you say Brisbane Airport is the largest in Australia. Again this is a little bit misleading. The citation you provide says Brisbane Airport is the largest in land area, you should be clear about the metric that you are making a claim about, and I don't think land area size greatly contributes to your hypothesis that Brisbane Airport contributes to Brisbane being an Asia-Pacific hub. Gather some statistics about flights to/from Asia/Pacific (number of fligts, number of destinationsto the various Australian airports, number of passengers, etc) how does Brisbane stand in relation to other Australian airports in that regard? Then you might have a claim to make about the Airport. Similarly you assert that QIMR and TRI are of global importance. On what basis do you say that? Work on improving the factual content of the article, wrt Asia/Pacific and then it may be more obvious what claims might be made in the lede paras. Thanks ] (]) 07:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:38, 22 October 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brisbane article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Top‑importance

	Australia portal Brisbane is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Template:V0.5

Brisbane was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 31, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
October 16, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
February 3, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
March 14, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 14, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

To-do list for Brisbane: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2022-07-18

Annual events - needs sourcing
Venues para - needs sourcing and rewriting for clarity
Media - inline cites
Utilities - choppy paras
No information as to what the proposed pipeline is and where it runs
The climate data table has significant errors. It sources the BOM but according to the Bureaus Brisbane regional office the city's annual rainfall is much higher than the amount in wiki. It also has less sunshine annual hours. Not 3000 but closer to 2730.
Historical Population information - note this was placed in the demographics of Brisbane article
Update the map to better focus on the main part of Brisbane, and use a more visually friendly map without random green patches and a lot fewer suburb names

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Queensland may be able to help!

Archives

Index

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brisbane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012155556/http://anzacday.org.au:80/education/tff/memorials/queensland.html to http://www.anzacday.org.au/education/tff/memorials/queensland.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=609048

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brisbane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.anzacday.org.au/education/tff/memorials/queensland.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/BCC%3ASTANDARD%3A%3Apc%3DPC_1217
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017042029/http://2015.buddhabirthdayfestival.com.au/festival to http://2015.buddhabirthdayfestival.com.au/festival
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tourismaustralia.com/content/Research/Factsheets/TopTen_Regions_Dec2006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Actually I'm pretty sure I coined the term Brisvegas in 1997

It's pretty simple actually. I was at a party/dinner/gathering of friends and friends of friends. We were talking about southeast Queensland now having two casinos, one in the Gold Coast - Jupiter's Casino and the new on in Brisbane - The Treasury. I was lamenting the fact that we should now probably rename the city Brisvegas. Everyone laughed but there were a couple there who had the opportunity to spread the term to a wider audience because they were breakfast radio hosts on a very popular radio station. After their success in Brisbane, they went to Perth to host there. I assume the term was spread across Australia within the space of a few years. Their initials are T and Z, but yeah I coined the term Brisvegas, cool huh? Cjreal (talk) 08:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Historical Population

An historical population table needs to be added to the article. Can someone put this on the to do list? Thanks PANewman (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.78.66.126 (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Nevermind, I put it on the list myself. Feel free to delete the item if I'm mistaken. Thanks. PANewman (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.78.66.126 (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Traditional name

I've added the traditional name for Brisbane in the Yagerra language, however there is no pronunciation guide. This would probably need an expert! I've just used the two pronunciations given on the State Library website. It may make sense to include this in the info box too. Maxxisti (talk) 04:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Brisbane as part of the Asia-Pacific

@Caltraser55: I have again reverted your edits in relation to Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific. As I have previously discussed, this citation does describe the current state of affairs but what the Qld Govt would like them to be. Now does your asserting something without citation make it rue. Futhermore, the bulk of the article (of which the lede paragraphs are supposed to be summarising) says relatively little about Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific. Can I suggest that instead of dumping largely uncited claims in the lede paragraphs, you focus on adding suitably-cited content on Brisbane's role in the Asia Pacific in other sections of the article. Those claims should be factual ones. For example, you say Brisbane Airport is the largest in Australia. Again this is a little bit misleading. The citation you provide says Brisbane Airport is the largest in land area, you should be clear about the metric that you are making a claim about, and I don't think land area size greatly contributes to your hypothesis that Brisbane Airport contributes to Brisbane being an Asia-Pacific hub. Gather some statistics about flights to/from Asia/Pacific (number of fligts, number of destinationsto the various Australian airports, number of passengers, etc) how does Brisbane stand in relation to other Australian airports in that regard? Then you might have a claim to make about the Airport. Similarly you assert that QIMR and TRI are of global importance. On what basis do you say that? Work on improving the factual content of the article, wrt Asia/Pacific and then it may be more obvious what claims might be made in the lede paras. Thanks Kerry (talk) 07:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Categories: