Revision as of 07:02, 9 November 2006 editAlec - U.K. (talk | contribs)970 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 11:37, 9 November 2006 edit undoAlec - U.K. (talk | contribs)970 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think you are getting Knights' Hill confused with Tulse Hill. Knights' Hill is to the south of Thurlow Park Road. It is Tulse Hill that is on the Lovelace Road side. The name of the road named after Knights' Hill has been made shorter not only by the removal of the third word but also by the dropping of the appostrophe. ] 07:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | I think you are getting Knights' Hill confused with Tulse Hill. Knights' Hill is to the south of Thurlow Park Road. It is Tulse Hill that is on the Lovelace Road side. The name of the road named after Knights' Hill has been made shorter not only by the removal of the third word but also by the dropping of the appostrophe. ] 07:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
I still think you are confusing the two mounds. You are making the same mistake as maps that have '''Tulse Hill''' mislabeled with the name of the smaller mound. ] 11:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:37, 9 November 2006
I think you are getting Knights' Hill confused with Tulse Hill. Knights' Hill is to the south of Thurlow Park Road. It is Tulse Hill that is on the Lovelace Road side. The name of the road named after Knights' Hill has been made shorter not only by the removal of the third word but also by the dropping of the appostrophe. Alec - U.K. 07:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
I still think you are confusing the two mounds. You are making the same mistake as maps that have Tulse Hill mislabeled with the name of the smaller mound. Alec - U.K. 11:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)