User talk:Jeh: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:54, 8 November 2018 editJeh (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,611 edits →Following me?: yup! And I will now be on the lookout for similar edits from other usernames← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:16, 11 November 2018 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,381,683 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jeh/Archives/2018/11. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:
	\| type = notice		\| type = notice
	}}		}}

	== Following me? ==

	You appear to be following me around Misplaced Pages as some sort of self-sanctioned police officer with a misplaced air of superiority. I think you really need to take a back seat and trying to halt the evolution of the encyclopedia with your 'views' which in many cases are nothing more than that. Looks like I'll need to use other accounts I've been using to prevent people with your level of sadness from doing what you do best. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	To add, in your most recent revert, your justification is invalid. You can't interchangeably chop and change different types of terms in the same sentence where at one part you state a defined audio reference level, that is, line level, and then you compare it with other undefined 'strengths'. How are you easily supposed to understand where line level sits in relation to speaker, instrument and microphone levels? Why make life hard for the populace and restrain the dissemination of knowledge - christ get a grip. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:58, 8 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

	: Re the ] article, I found your wording unencyclopedic and your addition in general unnecessary, so I reverted it. And yes, that's my opinion. A lot of edits are based on editors' opinions about wording, sentence structure, order of presentation, etc. That doesn't make them invalid.
	: Note that that was in the article lede; it is not necessary for the lede to explain everything completely - it is supposed to be a summary of what's in the article body. I'm not saying the original (which I didn't write, so you are off point when you refer to what "I state") was perfect, but yours added nothing to the reader's understanding. You're free to try again. I'll be free to revert or edit it, too.
	: ''"halt the evolution of the encyclopedia"'', ''"make life hard for the populace and restrain the dissemination of knowledge"'' - Haw! I'm completely unimpressed by such hyperbole and posturing. "Get a grip", indeed.
	: Re "Following" - Upon reverting certain types of mistakes, particularly those that indicate lack of competence (such as not understanding that we don't normally capitalize nouns that are neither proper names nor the first words of sentences, a rule that is not only covered in standard grade-school-level English but is also stated in our ]), a great many editors will check the "Contributions" of the reverted editor to see what else that person might have done along the same lines. That's part of collaboration here. Reverting such errors is not at all controversial, nor is using an editor's "Contributions" to find them.
	: Given your threat above, I should point out that there is a rule of "one person - one account", except for specifically allowed purposes such as tests (and in such cases you are supposed to document them as "belonging" to your main account on their user pages). You have just admitted that you edit from multiple accounts and will be using them to obfuscate your edit history. I must tell you that that is forbidden by WP policy (see ]) and can result in blocks, even indefinite blocks for repeat offenders - no matter how valid are the edits performed. It is a persistent problem, and some editors have access to special tools to aid in detection of such "sockpuppets". Please don't contribute to the problem.
	: Oh heck, people have been blocked for persistently "bristling" when their edits are reverted. Such as you've done here. (I must mention that your attitude as expressed here does seem consistent with your username.) Misplaced Pages is edited collaboratively, and editing here means accepting that your contributions may be freely changed or deleted by other editors. That's life here. ] (]) 16:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:16, 11 November 2018

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jeh.

jeh

2718 days

since a lost time incident on this page. (The previous record was 117 days.) Let's try to set a new record!

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Discussions of article content belong on that article's talk page, not here! Please do not use this page to complain about, argue against, etc., my edits—not, at least on the basis of their content. You can of course thank me for them here if you want! But per WP:TALK, any discussion (argument, debate, dispute, whatever) over article content belongs on that article's talk page, not here. That way, other interested editors can see the discussion and participate. (Who knows? Consensus might go against me! But that can't happen if nobody else sees the discussion.) Thank you for understanding.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

If I've edited a page, or its talk page, I am either a) watching it or b) don't care about it any more.
So if you edit a page I've edited, or its talk page, a message here to go look there is either a) unnecessary or b) pointless. And clutters up the edit history here and requires deletion.
If you really want to make sure that I've been notified of something you've written elsewhere, please use the {{ping|jeh}} template there (or on its talk page if there isn't already a talk page). Thank you.