| Revision as of 18:30, 21 November 2018 view sourceAtlantic306 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers154,273 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:13, 21 November 2018 view source Flyer22 Frozen (talk | contribs)365,630 edits →Just sayingNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Agree, your anti-vandal efforts are highly valued by a number of editors including me, regards ] (]) 18:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC) | Agree, your anti-vandal efforts are highly valued by a number of editors including me, regards ] (]) 18:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ], you blocked Jim for ]. Why? Surely, his reverting was justified. He's a patroller. ] does have exemptions. And regardless, ] should also be considered, as it was in case where ] semi-protected an article after I repeatedly reverted an IP who continued to add unsourced material without discussion, after I advised the IP to stop, and after I requested at ] that the article be protected. That is not a case where I should have been blocked. Jim is a very valuable patroller. He often takes the time to address problematic concerns. He doesn't blindly revert. ] (]) 19:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:13, 21 November 2018
Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.@Jauerback, Ritchie333, and Winged Blades of Godric: Thanks! I needed an excuse. Bye! Jim1138 talk 11:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Are you going to return? You're a great editor. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 12:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Just saying
Hey, Jim. Take a break and revisit your decision. Ping me if you need to vent. Tiderolls 16:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Agree, your anti-vandal efforts are highly valued by a number of editors including me, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Jauerback, you blocked Jim for WP:3RR. Why? Surely, his reverting was justified. He's a patroller. WP:3RR does have exemptions. And regardless, WP:Common sense should also be considered, as it was in this case where Fish and karate semi-protected an article after I repeatedly reverted an IP who continued to add unsourced material without discussion, after I advised the IP to stop, and after I requested at WP:Requests for page protection that the article be protected. That is not a case where I should have been blocked. Jim is a very valuable patroller. He often takes the time to address problematic concerns. He doesn't blindly revert. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)