Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dudley Miles: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:44, 10 December 2018 editSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers300,262 edits ISBNs: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:32, 10 December 2018 edit undoDudley Miles (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users50,207 edits ISBNs: ReplyNext edit →
Line 92: Line 92:


FYI, Dudley, there is no "standard" formating for ISBNs and their hyphens. WorldCat (US), Amazon (International), and the British Library present ISBN info without hyphens. (Here is the BL data for ''Hemingway'' by Nicholas McDowell (1987): .) And WP will read the ISBNs in templates with or without hyphens and with or without spaces. So, please look at the Black Death revert and you'll see that some of your reverted edits do not have hyphens. Thanks. – ] (]) 21:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC) FYI, Dudley, there is no "standard" formating for ISBNs and their hyphens. WorldCat (US), Amazon (International), and the British Library present ISBN info without hyphens. (Here is the BL data for ''Hemingway'' by Nicholas McDowell (1987): .) And WP will read the ISBNs in templates with or without hyphens and with or without spaces. So, please look at the Black Death revert and you'll see that some of your reverted edits do not have hyphens. Thanks. – ] (]) 21:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

:I should have said usual rather than standard. ISBNs are usually shown with hyphens or spaces in books and in Misplaced Pages. They are easier to read and copy correctly than a string of numbers without a break, which is why long numbers are better shown with commas - 314,658,235 not 314658235. The automatically converts to one with dashes. There is no reason to convert ISBNs with dashes to a continuous string as you did in the Black Death article. ] (]) 22:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:32, 10 December 2018

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7



This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Yo Ho Ho

Doug Weller talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Dudley. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Local Nature Reserves in Northamptonshire – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for October 15. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Giants. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!

Just dropping in to thank you for the review and support on the Bulgaria FAC. - ☣Tourbillon 13:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Bratislava Working Group FAC mentorship

Hello, I was wondering if you might be willing to help me with this article, which would be my first FAC. Since achieving GA status a few months ago, I put it up for PR and one editor said that he would support it at FAC if I had it copyedited. A very competent editor at GOCE had a look and made many prose improvements. My question is, should I go ahead and FA nominate it? My understanding is that many topics that are a bit out of the way fail due to insufficient interest/supports. Thanks for your help. Catrìona (talk) 10:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

I will try to look at this in the next few days. Dudley Miles (talk) 10:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Catrìona. The article seems to me not far off FA standard. The main problem is that you assume too much knowledge in the reader.
"The Working Group, unhappy with collaborationist elements in the Jewish Council (ÚŽ)" You need to explain what the Jewish Council was.
It is odd that you do not mention Bratislava in the lead except as part of the title. It should be mentioned and linked. It should also be linked on its first mention in the main text.
The red link to Nazi–Jewish negotiations seems far too general. My knowledge is very limited but I believe there were controversies about negotiations in other Nazi occupied areas.
The first paragraph of the background section is difficult to follow and its relevance to the article is unclear.
I suggest you go through the article trying to put yourself in the position of someone who knows nothing about the subject and see what needs further explanation.
It is true that articles sometimes fail due to lack of sufficient reviews but my impression is that even the most obscure ones do usually get enough comments, particularly if the nominator contributes by reviewing other articles. If an article is in danger of failing for that reason you can solicit reviews. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dudley Miles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dudley Miles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Denisovan

You seem to know the topic and I would trust your judgement if you want to fix that value. Meanwhile the Nat Geographic would look better than the one I had originally put as a ref. Best regards. SlightSmile 18:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks but I seem to have confused you by my error leaving in the wrong date of 90,000 years, which is for the new hybrid discovery, not the original finger bone. Dudley Miles (talk) 18:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Poors Allotment

Hello Dudley Miles I have added projects England, Environment, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

ISBNs

FYI, Dudley, there is no "standard" formating for ISBNs and their hyphens. WorldCat (US), Amazon (International), and the British Library present ISBN info without hyphens. (Here is the BL data for Hemingway by Nicholas McDowell (1987): UIN: BLL01011404170.) And WP will read the ISBNs in templates with or without hyphens and with or without spaces. So, please look at the Black Death revert and you'll see that some of your reverted edits do not have hyphens. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

I should have said usual rather than standard. ISBNs are usually shown with hyphens or spaces in books and in Misplaced Pages. They are easier to read and copy correctly than a string of numbers without a break, which is why long numbers are better shown with commas - 314,658,235 not 314658235. The ISBN converter automatically converts to one with dashes. There is no reason to convert ISBNs with dashes to a continuous string as you did in the Black Death article. Dudley Miles (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)