| Revision as of 06:06, 12 November 2006 editSmee (talk | contribs)28,728 edits →Why don't you close the 3RR case?← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:37, 12 November 2006 edit undoSm1969 (talk | contribs)1,497 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| 2) The principles of editing articles about ongoing enterprises are analogous to those which govern ]. As applied to this matter, unsourced or poorly sourced negative material may be removed without discussion, such removal being an exception to the 3 revert rule ]. This extension of policy is based on the proposition that any unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is potentially harmful. | 2) The principles of editing articles about ongoing enterprises are analogous to those which govern ]. As applied to this matter, unsourced or poorly sourced negative material may be removed without discussion, such removal being an exception to the 3 revert rule ]. This extension of policy is based on the proposition that any unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is potentially harmful. | ||
| :''Passed 6 to 0 at 14:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | :''Passed 6 to 0 at 14:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Notices of ] == | |||
| === ] === | |||
| I am filling a ] about this page ]. If you have any further questions or statements please DO NOT leave them on my talk page. Please place them here on the ] page. ] 23:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC). | |||
| ==== Why don't you close the 3RR case? ==== | |||
| I think you are well aware that 4 of the 6 cited examples are direct links to "France 3"'s material and the other two (2) are instructions on how to get the illegally distributed copyrighted material? Can you just close this case? If not, I will bring it up to the copyright people. | |||
| ] 05:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *You were specifically told above NOT to comment about this issue on my talk page. I think it is best for all involved if you never comment on my talk page again, as it seems from my perspective that you cannot behave with civility and a kind demeanor towards me. Thank you. ] 05:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC). | |||
| **Numerous policies point out that we should comment on one another's talk page. Talk pages are not supposed to be places where we gain sympathy for ourselves, but to discuss issues. Accusing someone of a 3RR, particularly with your six examples, is pretty uncivil. Look at the six examples you cited. ] 05:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***I am making a personal request that you no longer comment on my talk page, and only comment in related discussions on the talk pages of related articles. If you feel a need to comment on my talk page, it is best that you instead talk with an administrator, because it seems that you cannot comport yourself in a civil and kind manner with me. My apologies. Yours, ] 05:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC). | |||
| **** Can you cite any example that I am in bad faith if I decline your request? I think I am terse with you, but fair. I also think this 3RR is the most egregious abuse of policy yet with four of them being direct links to "France 3"s copyrighted material. ] 06:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *****I respect your opinion with regard to the 3RR, but you have my argument on the various pages. I am not an expert in Misplaced Pages Policy. However, '''I am making a personal request''' that you cease commenting on my talk page. I think it is for the best for all involved. I do not want to debate you on this. This is simply my own personal request, whatever the policies may be on this. Please respect my wishes. ] 06:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 12 November 2006
Welcome
Hello, Sm1969, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Psy guy 07:05, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages policy on linking to copyrighted works
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking_to_copyrighted_works
Linking to copyrighted works
External sites can possibly violate copyright. Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States (Intellectual Reserve v. Utah Lighthouse Ministry). Also, linking to a page that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on us. If the site in question is making fair use of the material, linking is fine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hunger
Articles regarding ongoing enterprises
2) The principles of editing articles about ongoing enterprises are analogous to those which govern Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons. As applied to this matter, unsourced or poorly sourced negative material may be removed without discussion, such removal being an exception to the 3 revert rule Misplaced Pages:Biographies_of_living_persons#Remove_unsourced_criticism. This extension of policy is based on the proposition that any unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is potentially harmful.
- Passed 6 to 0 at 14:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)