| Revision as of 08:21, 18 December 2018 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,574,706 editsm Substing templates: {{3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:42, 18 December 2018 edit undoD.Creish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users864 edits →FYI, 1RRNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->. ] is under 1RR - that means no more than 1 revert per 24 hours. I'm gonna suggest a self revert. ] (]) 08:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC) | '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->. ] is under 1RR - that means no more than 1 revert per 24 hours. I'm gonna suggest a self revert. ] (]) 08:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :Considering you and your friend ignored consensus required I don't think a complaining would end well for you. But you can try it! ] (]) 08:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:42, 18 December 2018
Welcome!
Hello, IntelligentName, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Jogi 007 (talk) 06:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Fractional Reserve Banking
Hi,
I saw that you made edits to Fractional Reserve Banking recently. I wonder if you would like to vote or pass comment on this rather important proposed change to the page => Time to change which theory gets prominence? - BTW, yes I know that this has been discussed before, but I think that there are good reasons why this issue should periodically be reviewed. Cheers Reissgo (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- I agree. Thank you.--IntelligentName (talk) 06:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Robert H. Hemphill
Hi,
You posted a quote from Robert H. Hemphill which was apparently in the first edition of Irving Fisher's 100% Money.
Your help in writing an article about this man will be much appreciated. --JamesPoulson (talk) 02:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
FYI, 1RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Stephen Miller is under 1RR - that means no more than 1 revert per 24 hours. I'm gonna suggest a self revert. PeterTheFourth (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- Considering you and your friend ignored consensus required I don't think a complaining would end well for you. But you can try it! D.Creish (talk) 08:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)