Misplaced Pages

User talk:BabyDweezil: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:42, 16 November 2006 view sourceBabyDweezil (talk | contribs)1,482 edits →Three-revert rule← Previous edit Revision as of 20:33, 16 November 2006 view source William M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,050 edits User notice: temporary 3RR blockNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
::''Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject'' ::''Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject''
::I would also appreciate the invlovement of admins other than the two thus far, both of whom are heavily involved in the editing of the Berlet Misplaced Pages entry. ] 17:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC) ::I would also appreciate the invlovement of admins other than the two thus far, both of whom are heavily involved in the editing of the Berlet Misplaced Pages entry. ] 17:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]==
<div class="user-block"> ]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 8 hours.

Also, impolite edit summaries area bad idea

] 20:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)</div>

Revision as of 20:33, 16 November 2006

Welcome to BabyDweezil's Talk Page.

Request for mediation

This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead.
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Example. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to formal mediation, and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you,

--Cberlet 15:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

(wacky rant from GrownUpAndWise deleted)

Fred Newman

Baby, please do not restore material about a living person that might be a violation of BLP. You restored it claiming it was sourced when it very clearly was not sourced. Misplaced Pages takes BLP issues very, very seriously, so please edit in accordance with WP:BLP in future. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 21:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

It was sourced. Please cite what you feel needs sourcing, and as I always have done, it will be addressed. BabyDweezil 21:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
If you add that again without a reliable source (not a self-published newsletter), you will be blocked from editing. SlimVirgin 23:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Tom Harrison 17:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Have attempted to discuss endlessly--Berlet refuses to address issues. There is a WP:BLP issue which Berlet refuses to discuss.
Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject
I would also appreciate the invlovement of admins other than the two thus far, both of whom are heavily involved in the editing of the Berlet Misplaced Pages entry. BabyDweezil 17:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions made on November 16 2006 to Fred Newman

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 8 hours.

Also, impolite edit summaries area bad idea

William M. Connolley 20:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
User talk:BabyDweezil: Difference between revisions Add topic