Talk:Cory Booker 2020 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:16, 7 March 2019 editMuboshgu (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators376,713 edits →Human rights: Replying to Tony85poon (reply-link)← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:26, 7 March 2019 edit undoTony85poon (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,863 edits →Human rights: by the wayNext edit →
Line 89:		Line 89:
	* Anything can happen. It could be Elizabeth Warren (wins nomination) and then pick Cory Booker as running mate. It could be Cory Booker (wins nomination) and then pick Elizabeth Warren as running mate. If could be ] being nominated and then pick who-ever as running mate. ] (]) 04:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)		* Anything can happen. It could be Elizabeth Warren (wins nomination) and then pick Cory Booker as running mate. It could be Cory Booker (wins nomination) and then pick Elizabeth Warren as running mate. If could be ] being nominated and then pick who-ever as running mate. ] (]) 04:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
	*:{{u\|Tony85poon}}, you're clearly editing Misplaced Pages from a ]. If you're not able to edit neutrally on this subject, an administrator can block you from editing on it. – ] (]) 04:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)		*:{{u\|Tony85poon}}, you're clearly editing Misplaced Pages from a ]. If you're not able to edit neutrally on this subject, an administrator can block you from editing on it. – ] (]) 04:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

			*:: Go tell an administrator please. By the way, no one is helping with the education issue yet. ] (]) 04:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:26, 7 March 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cory Booker 2020 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Template:WPUS50k

Cannabis prohibition

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cory-booker-opens-white-house-run-with-call-for-end-to-marijuana-prohibition-2019-02-01

---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

The announcement

I would like to add the following citation for the 1 Feb announcement WITHOUT THE QUOTATION <ref>{{cite web|title=President Trump tells CBS News’ Margaret Brennan that Cory Booker “has no chance”|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZtBbc5zGBc|website=YouTube|publisher=Face the Nation|date=2019-02-01|accessdate=2019-02-09}}</ref> If the reader want to verify the source and click further, they can watch the neutral video. If the reader does not watch the video, the citation simply supports that the announcement did in fact happen on 1 Feb. Look forward to hearing the objection and counter-argument. I am definitely not joking. Tony85poon (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Tony85poon, I regret my initial edit summary. That was a mistake on my part. However, that snippet has no place in this article. It's not a neutral video, because Trump is not a neutral party in the 2020 presidential election. Of course, Trump will say Booker has no chance of beating him. Putting the video in the article seems to have no purpose but to provide some anti-Booker propaganda, which is not WP:NPOV. Also, WP:YOUTUBE says that sourcing with YouTube videos is frowned upon. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Whatever you say, Sir. The Chinese and Spanish wikipedia-readers are loving that citation. Tony85poon (talk) 03:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Political Positions

Take a look at Kamala Harris 2020 presidential campaign#Political positions, her article has so much substance, we got to expand the Cory section with substance fast! Tony85poon (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

For the sake of fairness, readers should feel free to read the following too,

Tony85poon (talk) 03:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Where can this citation fit? It is relevant to the education issue. Cheers. Tony85poon (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

"Whereabouts" section

Over at the Kirsten Gillibrand 2020 presidential campaign talk page, there's an ongoing discussion about the "Whereabouts" section, which has been removed from the article. Should we remove the section from here as well? What purpose does this section serve? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Ca:Campanya_presidencial_de_Cory_Booker_de_2020#Parador

nl:Cory_Booker_2020_presidentiële_campagne#Verblijfplaats

Readers like to know about where he campaigned. When they click the citation numbers, readers can further read the reactions he gets over there significantly. I mean, if it is only an airport (the campaign activity does require him to take the aeroplane), he stops and talks with supporters for a brief moment, then the airport-name does not go into the article. I remember some Tweet showing that it was a "Manchester Airport" by the way.

I believe in freedom of speech, so your counter-argument is welcomed. Tony85poon (talk) 03:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cory_Booker_2020_presidential_campaign&oldid=883064759

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cory_Booker_2020_presidential_campaign&oldid=883067811

What's also useful? Compare old versions. I simplified the last sentence in the "Background" section to "That year and in early 2019, he began making trips early in the campaign schedule" so that readers benefit from efficiency (faster understanding of political concepts). Tony85poon (talk) 03:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Remove the "Whereabouts" section for all the same reasons it was removed from the Gillibrand article (see that discussion). Simply put, it is un-encyclopedic and possibly a violation of WP:RECENTISM.---A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 14:12, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Don't jump the gun. I used the "Request for Comment" function at the Gillibrand article Talk Page, and that dispute hasn't reached a consensus yet. In this page, I hope editors understand "Recentism as a positive". Tony85poon (talk) 02:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

A. Randomdude0000, Agreed. I'm starting to find some of Tony's edits across several articles problematic. I've gone ahead and removed the "Whereabouts" section. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Bring them to my Talk Page. I actually apologize when I later find myself wrong. Tony85poon (talk) 02:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Remove I thought about doing it unilaterally earlier, but didn't. "Presidential candidate visits Iowa/New Hampshire/South Carolina" is the sort of WP:ROUTINE thing we don't need to document. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, the part where Cory Booker walks into a cafe to buy coffee (coz campaigning is physically demanding) is routine. Where Cory Booker live temporarily is routine (but some sources say that a supporter offered her own house for Cory Booker to stay overnight). What's NOT routine is the reaction of the people. Tony85poon (talk) 02:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Remove Tony85poon needs to understand that WP:BEBOLD has its limits. R2 (bleep) 21:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

If I have crossed the "limit", go ask an administrator to block me from editing. I did receive a threat about blocking me for a month. The threat was by User talk:Supermann. Tony85poon (talk) 02:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

WP:NOTDEMOCRACY. Tony85poon (talk) 03:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Human rights

This edit summary caught my attention

thanks for using my image, but this doesn't really have anything to do with surrounding content

Let me elaborate:

The last time a US presidential election (at the general level, not the primary level) had a female was Hillary Clinton in 2016. Before that, Sarah Palin in 2008.
In the file, there is Elizabeth Warren as well.
The significance is that 2020 US presidential politics should not be dominated by males. Females also have good chances to be president and vice - president.
Anything can happen. It could be Elizabeth Warren (wins nomination) and then pick Cory Booker as running mate. It could be Cory Booker (wins nomination) and then pick Elizabeth Warren as running mate. If could be Kamala Harris being nominated and then pick who-ever as running mate. Tony85poon (talk) 04:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Tony85poon, you're clearly editing Misplaced Pages from a point of view. If you're not able to edit neutrally on this subject, an administrator can block you from editing on it. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:16, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Go tell an administrator please. By the way, no one is helping with the education issue yet. Tony85poon (talk) 04:26, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Categories: