| Revision as of 04:41, 21 January 2019 editDaviddwd (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,790 edits short descTag: Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:56, 18 April 2019 edit undoRich Farmbrough (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors1,725,687 edits Copyedit. Date formatsNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| ==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
| *{{citation | *{{citation | ||
| |last=Bailey |
|last=Bailey | ||
| |first=F. G. |
|first=F. G. | ||
| |authorlink=F.G. Bailey | |authorlink=F.G. Bailey | ||
| |year=1959 | |year=1959 | ||
| |title=Politics and Social Change |
|title=Politics and Social Change | ||
| |publisher=University of California Press |
|publisher=University of California Press | ||
| |location=Berkeley |
|location=Berkeley | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| *{{citation | *{{citation | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| |first2=Rodney | |first2=Rodney | ||
| |year=2000 | |year=2000 | ||
| |title=Obituary: M. N. Srinivas |
|title=Obituary: M. N. Srinivas | ||
| |journal=Anthropology Today | |journal=Anthropology Today | ||
| |volume=16 | |volume=16 | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| |first=Frank | |first=Frank | ||
| |year=2014 | |year=2014 | ||
| |title=Objectification and Social Aesthetics: Memoranda and the Celebration of "Badaga Day" |
|title=Objectification and Social Aesthetics: Memoranda and the Celebration of "Badaga Day" | ||
| |journal=Asian Ethnology | |journal=Asian Ethnology | ||
| |volume=73 | |volume=73 | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
| |first=Manjari | |first=Manjari | ||
| |year=2011 | |year=2011 | ||
| |title=The Understanding of Freedom in Hindutva |
|title=The Understanding of Freedom in Hindutva | ||
| |journal=Social Scientist | |journal=Social Scientist | ||
| |volume=39 | |volume=39 | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| |chapter=The Social System of a Mysore Village | |chapter=The Social System of a Mysore Village | ||
| |editor-last=Marriott | |editor-last=Marriott | ||
| |editor-first=McKim |
|editor-first=McKim | ||
| |title=Village India: studies in the little community | |title=Village India: studies in the little community | ||
| |publisher=University of Chicago Press | |publisher=University of Chicago Press | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
| {{wiktionary|vote bank|Votebank}} | {{wiktionary|vote bank|Votebank}} | ||
| * | * | ||
| {{Use dmy dates|date=April 2019}} | |||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 18 April 2019
Type of voting block on ethnic or identity linesA votebank (also spelled vote-bank or vote bank) is a loyal bloc of voters from a single community, who consistently back a certain candidate or political formation in democratic elections. Such behaviour is often the result of an expectation of real or imagined benefits from the political formations, often at the cost of other communities. Votebank politics is the practice of creating and maintaining votebanks through divisive policies. As it encourages voters to vote on the basis of narrow communal considerations, often against their better judgement, it is considered harmful to the principles of representative democracy.
Etymology
The term vote-bank was first used by noted Indian sociologist, M. N. Srinivas (who also coined the terms Sanskritisation and dominant caste), in his 1955 paper entitled The Social System of a Mysore Village. He used it in the context of political influence exerted by a patron over a client. Later, the expression was used by F. G. Bailey, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, San Diego, in his 1959 book Politics and Social Change, to refer to the electoral influence of the caste leader. This is the usage that has since become popular.
Examples
Some of the first identified votebanks were along caste lines. Others based on other community characteristics, such as religion and language, have also occurred. Votebanks are generally considered undesirable in electoral politics. For example, Thapar (2013) argues that votebanks based on either caste or religion stand in the way of secularisation. Katju (2011) identifies accusations of votebanking as a rhetorical tool used by Hindu nationalists in complaints about special rights or privileges granted to non-Hindus in India. Other examples include:
- In 1989, the Badaga people of South India petitioned the Indian government to be recognized as an official tribe, demonstrating en masse on 15 May of that year to imply the strength of the Badaga votebank.
- India's Left Front party historically has solid support in rural West Bengal.
See also
- Client politics
- Clientelism
- Constituency
- Indian politics
- Identity politics
- Electoral system
- Political campaigning
- Social disintegration
- Blocks of Five
- Red states and blue states
References
- Grillo (2000). sfnp error: no target: CITEREFGrillo2000 (help)
- Srinivas (1955).
- Bailey (1959).
- Heidemann (2014), p. 96.
- Basu (2007), p. 301.
Bibliography
- Bailey, F. G. (1959), Politics and Social Change, Berkeley: University of California Press
- Basu, Partha (2007), ""Brand Buddha" in India's West Bengal: The Left Reinvents Itself", Asian Survey, 47 (2): 288–306, doi:10.1525/as.2007.47.2.288
- Grillo, Ralph; Needham, Rodney (2000), "Obituary: M. N. Srinivas", Anthropology Today, 16 (1): 22, doi:10.1111/1467-8322.00007, ISSN 0268-540X, JSTOR 2678199
- Heidemann, Frank (2014), "Objectification and Social Aesthetics: Memoranda and the Celebration of "Badaga Day"", Asian Ethnology, 73 (1/2): 91–109
- Katju, Manjari (2011), "The Understanding of Freedom in Hindutva", Social Scientist, 39 (3/4): 3–22
- Srinivas, M. N. (1955), "The Social System of a Mysore Village", in Marriott, McKim (ed.), Village India: studies in the little community, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–35
- Thapar, Romila (2013), "The Secular Mode for India", Social Scientist, 41 (11/12): 3–10
- Shourie, Arun (2012). Falling over backwards: An essay on reservations and judicial populism. New Delhi: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 978-9350293553
External links
Categories: