| Revision as of 12:44, 13 November 2006 editJohn Vandenberg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users68,507 editsm signing old comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:59, 22 November 2006 edit undo194.82.51.28 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| No the name change was a pointless bit of re-branding by a new boss, it wasted money when research was being cut and other facilities were being reduced (such as paying students some money back for travel to distant placements). There was a sense of lots of change in 2004-5 (around when I was leaving) and little of it seemed good, this included the renaming of the School Club - also pointless. ] 22:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC) PS I did not post the above paragraph, it is unsigned by someone else | No the name change was a pointless bit of re-branding by a new boss, it wasted money when research was being cut and other facilities were being reduced (such as paying students some money back for travel to distant placements). There was a sense of lots of change in 2004-5 (around when I was leaving) and little of it seemed good, this included the renaming of the School Club - also pointless. ] 22:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC) PS I did not post the above paragraph, it is unsigned by someone else | ||
| <nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki> | |||
| St Georges is great although with the influx of all the graduates, the moral has gone down a bit, namely with the view that they are old and boring and do not contribute anything to the Students Union. More damage than good was caused by a past graduate president who was in "power" for 2 years and at the end of his "era" was hated by most students. | |||
Revision as of 17:59, 22 November 2006
This is now called St George's, University of London.
- That's what the article says. I have my doubts whether this new title will last; it's borne out of jealousy for UCL and Imperial, and with a hint to QMUL. JFW | T@lk 23:08, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
Hmmm no, I have to disagree with the above, the name change was to reflect the true nature of St. George's, certainly there are a large number of Medical Students in house but there are also large numbers of Nurses, Physiotherapists, Occupational Therapist, Radiographers etc and the name change was to reflect the true multidisplinary nature of St. George's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.82.51.28 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
No the name change was a pointless bit of re-branding by a new boss, it wasted money when research was being cut and other facilities were being reduced (such as paying students some money back for travel to distant placements). There was a sense of lots of change in 2004-5 (around when I was leaving) and little of it seemed good, this included the renaming of the School Club - also pointless. Doctormonkey 22:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC) PS I did not post the above paragraph, it is unsigned by someone else
Insert non-formatted text here
St Georges is great although with the influx of all the graduates, the moral has gone down a bit, namely with the view that they are old and boring and do not contribute anything to the Students Union. More damage than good was caused by a past graduate president who was in "power" for 2 years and at the end of his "era" was hated by most students.