Misplaced Pages

Talk:Dabhi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:19, 19 April 2016 editAnachronist (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators67,299 editsm Amatulic moved page Talk:Dabhi dynasty to Talk:Dabhi over redirect: revert - no reason given for move← Previous edit Revision as of 09:44, 1 May 2019 edit undoSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →Sourcing: new sectionNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
== Recent move == == Recent move ==
This article was {{diff|Dabhi dynasty|714683523|712866912|moved yesterday}} from ] to ] by {{User|Dangarwa}} without a rationale. Searching for sources I only get 2 Gbook hits using the term ''Dabhi dynasty''. Why was the article moved? ] ] 11:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC) This article was {{diff|Dabhi dynasty|714683523|712866912|moved yesterday}} from ] to ] by {{User|Dangarwa}} without a rationale. Searching for sources I only get 2 Gbook hits using the term ''Dabhi dynasty''. Why was the article moved? ] ] 11:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

== Sourcing ==

Regarding of a large chunk of material, please note that the ] is that sources from the British Raj era are not ]. Furthermore, much of what was reinstated in that edit was completely unsourced - please read the information at ]. - ] (]) 09:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:44, 1 May 2019

WikiProject iconIndia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent move

This article was moved yesterday from Dabhi to Dabhi dynasty by Dangarwa (talk · contribs) without a rationale. Searching for sources I only get 2 Gbook hits using the term Dabhi dynasty. Why was the article moved? Sam Sailor 11:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Sourcing

Regarding this reinstatement of a large chunk of material, please note that the consensus is that sources from the British Raj era are not reliable. Furthermore, much of what was reinstated in that edit was completely unsourced - please read the information at WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Categories: