Talk:Book of Exodus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:41, 2 May 2019 editTgeorgescu (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users55,073 editsm →Edit war: typo← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:52, 2 May 2019 edit undoFajkfnjsak (talk \| contribs)329 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	{{ping\|Fajkfnjsak}} Are you Fretheim? Then what do you change the abstract of what Fretheim stated? Do you think that the ]d ] does not ]erify the claim? Then say so, instead of going into wild tangents about objectivity. ] (]) 04:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)		{{ping\|Fajkfnjsak}} Are you Fretheim? Then what do you change the abstract of what Fretheim stated? Do you think that the ]d ] does not ]erify the claim? Then say so, instead of going into wild tangents about objectivity. ] (]) 04:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

			{{ping\|Tgeorgescu}} Misplaced Pages is not a record of anyone's interpretation of purpose of religious text, Fretheim or anyone else. The article should remain neutral. As an encyclopedia, wikipedia, presents educational information about Exodus, from Freithem or otherwise. The rest of that sentence is an analysis of Exodus from Fretheim. But "the purpose" is a subjective personal religious experience. Fretheim's personal belief about what he thinks the purpose is should not be included as it is not an academic analysis. The way I phrased it and the citations I include present a neutral academic view.

Revision as of 04:52, 2 May 2019

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Bible Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Judaism High‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ancient Near East

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

What are we doing with this: Mass Exodus. Redirect, merge or separate article?

The instance in which a large group of people, animals, or objects attempt to leave, evacutate or move to a different location.

Some famous exodus include the jewish exodus from Egypt to the promised lands.

Refugees ussally partake in exodus from troubled lands.

It’s not an exodus unless it’s a mass exodus.

Redirect, merdge or seperate article?

Book of Exodus

Is there a reason why the name of this article does not start with "Book of"? All the other articles in the Old Testament category start that way, except for four of the five books of the Torah. If there are no objections, I'll have it changed.

Leave as is

Because of its controversy there is a lot of scope for expanding it, so I believe it should not be merged.

Woodcuts

Epiphyllumlover, you seem to be on a general woodcut-spree, and in this article you are definitely over-doing it. Please reconsider. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Let me finish first, okay? They are beautiful woodcuts. Too bad the articles aren't longer for them.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 11:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Moderation. This article is not a Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld gallery. But consider making a woodcut-galley in that article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

@Fajkfnjsak: Are you Fretheim? Then what do you change the abstract of what Fretheim stated? Do you think that the WP:CITEd WP:RS does not WP:Verify the claim? Then say so, instead of going into wild tangents about objectivity. Tgeorgescu (talk) 04:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

@Tgeorgescu: Misplaced Pages is not a record of anyone's interpretation of purpose of religious text, Fretheim or anyone else. The article should remain neutral. As an encyclopedia, wikipedia, presents educational information about Exodus, from Freithem or otherwise. The rest of that sentence is an analysis of Exodus from Fretheim. But "the purpose" is a subjective personal religious experience. Fretheim's personal belief about what he thinks the purpose is should not be included as it is not an academic analysis. The way I phrased it and the citations I include present a neutral academic view.

Categories:

Revision as of 04:41, 2 May 2019 editTgeorgescu (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users55,073 editsm →Edit war: typo← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:52, 2 May 2019 edit undoFajkfnjsak (talk \| contribs)329 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	{{ping\|Fajkfnjsak}} Are you Fretheim? Then what do you change the abstract of what Fretheim stated? Do you think that the ]d ] does not ]erify the claim? Then say so, instead of going into wild tangents about objectivity. ] (]) 04:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)		{{ping\|Fajkfnjsak}} Are you Fretheim? Then what do you change the abstract of what Fretheim stated? Do you think that the ]d ] does not ]erify the claim? Then say so, instead of going into wild tangents about objectivity. ] (]) 04:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

			{{ping\|Tgeorgescu}} Misplaced Pages is not a record of anyone's interpretation of purpose of religious text, Fretheim or anyone else. The article should remain neutral. As an encyclopedia, wikipedia, presents educational information about Exodus, from Freithem or otherwise. The rest of that sentence is an analysis of Exodus from Fretheim. But "the purpose" is a subjective personal religious experience. Fretheim's personal belief about what he thinks the purpose is should not be included as it is not an academic analysis. The way I phrased it and the citations I include present a neutral academic view.