Revision as of 22:57, 22 November 2006 editFreplySpang (talk | contribs)24,796 edits thanks for the headsup← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:35, 23 November 2006 edit undoYanksox (talk | contribs)Rollbackers12,375 editsm WikibreakNext edit → | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
: Thanks for the headsup. I don't think ]ing it is the right thing, because it's okay with me if someone wants to try writing a non-copyvio version of it. (I'm not certain that it would meet our ], but I'm not certain it wouldn't.) I'll be around off and on tonight, but I'll try to keep an eye on it. Cheers, ] 22:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | : Thanks for the headsup. I don't think ]ing it is the right thing, because it's okay with me if someone wants to try writing a non-copyvio version of it. (I'm not certain that it would meet our ], but I'm not certain it wouldn't.) I'll be around off and on tonight, but I'll try to keep an eye on it. Cheers, ] 22:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Wikibreak == | |||
Sorry about the off the cuff Wikibreak, I left a comment on your admin coaching page. ] 03:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:35, 23 November 2006
|
Publishers Bindings copyvio
Thanks...never noticed that the db-repost wasn't for speedied things. However, given that the article again appears to be the same as it was the last two (!) times it was speedied as copyvio, can it be simply speedied again on those same merits? DMacks 22:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the headsup. I don't think WP:SALTing it is the right thing, because it's okay with me if someone wants to try writing a non-copyvio version of it. (I'm not certain that it would meet our notability standards, but I'm not certain it wouldn't.) I'll be around off and on tonight, but I'll try to keep an eye on it. Cheers, FreplySpang 22:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikibreak
Sorry about the off the cuff Wikibreak, I left a comment on your admin coaching page. Yanksox 03:35, 23 November 2006 (UTC)