| Revision as of 14:36, 16 May 2019 edit7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers152,696 editsm format← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:43, 16 May 2019 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| *'''Comment''' It's not about you. Nobody "accused" you of having anything to do with the DYK. Your involvement was related to the not the DYK. | *'''Comment''' It's not about you. Nobody "accused" you of having anything to do with the DYK. Your involvement was related to the not the DYK. | ||
| :To the extent that I had a misplaced participle phrase (which evidently caused your concern) I apologize. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 14:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | :To the extent that I had a misplaced participle phrase (which evidently caused your concern) I apologize. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 14:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::I honestly have no idea what any of the above is trying to say. "participle phrase"? "misplaced"? "not about me"? I don't even care to ask; please just leave me alone already, and stop bringing up your past disputes with me in completely unrelated fora. ] (<small>]]</small>) 14:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
| <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 16 May 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Richard Haine
( )- ... that Dickie Haine flew in the RAF's first night fighter patrol of WW2?
- Reviewed: Agadzagadza
- Comment: Currently at AfD but likely to be kept. See the Telegraph or Times to confirm the hook.
5x expanded by Lubbad85 (talk) and TeriEmbrey (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 11:41, 10 May 2019 (UTC).
- "WW2" -> "the Second World War" Clarityfiend (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment AFD was closed as keep. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:10, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- Needs the change proposed by Clarityfiend for grammatical correctness.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Zerach (talk) 20:42, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Since I was accused, somewhat out-of-the-blue on an unrelated discussion, of supposedly having opposed this DYK nomination, I should say that I don't care one way or the other, and had already both withdrawn my AFD !vote and taken a wikibreak (to get away from the harassment I was receiving on that AFD) at the time this DYK nomination was filed, and have to this point not mentioned it anywhere on-wiki. But in case it's still not clear I don't oppose this nomination. Please do not bring it up in relation to me again. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 14:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It's not about you. Nobody "accused" you of having anything to do with the DYK. Your involvement was related to the deletion not the DYK.
- To the extent that I had a misplaced participle phrase (which evidently caused your concern) I apologize. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)