| Revision as of 08:42, 5 June 2019 editAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 edits →June 2019: started a discussion there as well← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:12, 6 June 2019 edit undoGuarapiranga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,889 edits →June 2019: ReplyTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * Guarapiranga, you seem to be edit-warring in a similar way at ]. If you don't start using talk pages to get consensus when you are made aware that there is disagreement with your edits, and instead keep edit-warring (with or without the belligerent edit-summaries you've been using), you are likely to get yourself blocked. I'd hate to see that happen, so please listen to advice and alter your approach. Thank you. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 07:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | * Guarapiranga, you seem to be edit-warring in a similar way at ]. If you don't start using talk pages to get consensus when you are made aware that there is disagreement with your edits, and instead keep edit-warring (with or without the belligerent edit-summaries you've been using), you are likely to get yourself blocked. I'd hate to see that happen, so please listen to advice and alter your approach. Thank you. --<span style="font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;color:#004d80;"> ]</span> 07:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| **I've started a discussion at that article as the graph problems there are identical. However, I've recommended that we maintain a single discussion at ] where we can work toward fixing the problems in both graphs at once. I've alerted {{u|Akld guy}} as the editor opposing the graph there. --] (]) 08:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | **I've started a discussion at that article as the graph problems there are identical. However, I've recommended that we maintain a single discussion at ] where we can work toward fixing the problems in both graphs at once. I've alerted {{u|Akld guy}} as the editor opposing the graph there. --] (]) 08:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ] Did I start the war? No, I didn't. You emphasise using the Talk page, but did you use it to discuss the changes before reverting them? No, you didn't. ''"Good for thee, not for me"''? — ] (]) 04:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:12, 6 June 2019
June 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries and dependencies by population; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 07:31, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- The latest errors with your graph are explained at Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population#New graph. You need to get this right before it is added to the article. You can't just keep edit-warring over it. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Guarapiranga, you seem to be edit-warring in a similar way at Jewish population by country. If you don't start using talk pages to get consensus when you are made aware that there is disagreement with your edits, and instead keep edit-warring (with or without the belligerent edit-summaries you've been using), you are likely to get yourself blocked. I'd hate to see that happen, so please listen to advice and alter your approach. Thank you. -- Begoon 07:40, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- I've started a discussion at that article as the graph problems there are identical. However, I've recommended that we maintain a single discussion at Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population#New graph where we can work toward fixing the problems in both graphs at once. I've alerted Akld guy as the editor opposing the graph there. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Did I start the war? No, I didn't. You emphasise using the Talk page, but did you use it to discuss the changes before reverting them? No, you didn't. "Good for thee, not for me"? — Guarapiranga (talk) 04:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)