Misplaced Pages

User:Hijiri88/Old sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Hijiri88 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:45, 7 June 2019 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,391 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 03:40, 9 June 2019 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,391 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
*'''Oppose''' I agreed to avoid Lubbad voluntarily ''on condition'' that he be placed on notice regarding the rest of his disruption, which he has already been warned about several times in the past. I cannot agree to this proposal that explicitly ''doesn't'' do so regarding any of his personal attacks, harassment, "opposition research" (essentially hounding), etc. and instead chooses to punish me for having "bludgeoned" an ANI thread ''about me'' by posting X number of times, after having a good nine hours until multiple other editors had already commented. Punishing editors for defending themselves against hounding (by Slatersteven and Thunderchunder, even if not by Lubbad) is completely absurd -- how about warning Slatersteven for trolling me into repeatedly responding to him? ] (<small>]]</small>) 03:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
== Warning regarding repeated revenge-baiting ==
I wasn't gonna reply again, but I was just looking at the first ANI thread, and you literally said {{tq|''Hard to see how that is not a PA, I think a warning is in order.''}}, to which the closing admin replied {{tq|''@Lubbad85: please don't do that anymore.''}}

Now, I would like to know why you were trying to see how that was not a PA: you said it was "hard" to do so, and in the same thread alluded to your own past history with me (which began with me a bit of blatant misrepresentation on your part, in a bogus ANI report attacking an editor you were trolling, and has gone downhill since that editor could take no more and committed wiki-suicide). In this case, when it is ''me'' that's being accused of personal attacks, you are straining very hard to make my having said "This is probably not racist" become me saying "This is racist". That inconsistency in your response is curious; why do you look for excuse ''not'' to call comments targeting me personal attacks, but when the comments were supposedly made ''by'' me suddenly you look for an excuse to ''call'' them personal attacks.

Ironically enough, "This user is calling me racist!" ] ({{tq|''Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence'' ''.''}}) and you seem to have no problem with Lubbad having made this attack no less than 11 times in this thread despite being asked to stop.

] (<small>]]</small>) 23:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:40, 9 June 2019

  • Oppose I agreed to avoid Lubbad voluntarily on condition that he be placed on notice regarding the rest of his disruption, which he has already been warned about several times in the past. I cannot agree to this proposal that explicitly doesn't do so regarding any of his personal attacks, harassment, "opposition research" (essentially hounding), etc. and instead chooses to punish me for having "bludgeoned" an ANI thread about me by posting X number of times, after having waited a good nine hours until multiple other editors had already commented. Punishing editors for defending themselves against hounding (by Slatersteven and Thunderchunder, even if not by Lubbad) is completely absurd -- how about warning Slatersteven for trolling me into repeatedly responding to him? Hijiri 88 (やや) 03:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
User:Hijiri88/Old sandbox: Difference between revisions Add topic