Misplaced Pages

Archaeopriapulida: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:27, 22 May 2019 editVidesh Ramsahai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,020 editsm Fixing disambiguation linkTag: Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 22:38, 16 June 2019 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,879,760 editsm +{{Taxonbar|from=Q4785523}} (1 sig. taxon ID); WP:GenFixes on,Tag: AWBNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
}} }}


'''Archaeopriapulida''' is a group of ]-like worms known from ] ].<ref name=SCM1979>{{Cite journal| last1 = Conway Morris | first1 = S.| title = The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) Fauna| journal = Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics| volume = 10| pages = 327–349| year = 1979| doi = 10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001551}}</ref> The group is closely related to, and very similar to, the modern Priapulids.<ref name='Por1983'>{{Cite journal| first1 = F. D.| title = Class Seticoronaria and Phylogeny of the Phylum Priapulida| journal = Zoologica Scripta| last1 = Por| volume = 12| issue = 4| pages = 267–272| year = 1983| doi = 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1983.tb00510.x }}</ref> It is unclear whether it is mono- or polyphyletic.<ref name=Wills1998>{{Cite journal| first = M. A. | title = Cambrian and Recent Disparity: the Picture from Priapulids | journal = Paleobiology | volume = 24 | issue = 2| last = Wills | pages = 155–286 | date = 1 April 1998 | jstor = 2401237}}</ref> Despite a remarkable morphological similarity to their modern cousins,<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Huang | first1 = D.-Y. | last2 = Vannier | first2 = J. | last3 = Chen | first3 = J.-Y. | title = Anatomy and lifestyles of Early Cambrian priapulid worms exemplified by ''Corynetis'' and ''Anningvermis'' from the Maotianshan Shale (SW China) | journal = Lethaia | volume = 37 | pages = 21–33 | year = 2004 | doi = 10.1080/00241160410005088}}</ref> they fall outside of the priapulid ], which is not unambiguously represented in the fossil record until the Carboniferous.<ref name=Budd2000>{{cite journal |last1=Budd |first1=G. E. |last2=Jensen |first2=S. |year=2000 |title=A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla |volume=75 |issue=2 |pages=253–95 |journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |doi=10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00046.x |pmid=10881389}}</ref> They are probably closely related or paraphyletic to the ]s; the relationship between these basal worms is somewhat unresolved.<ref name=Wills1998/> '''Archaeopriapulida''' is a group of ]-like worms known from ] ].<ref name=SCM1979>{{Cite journal| last1 = Conway Morris | first1 = S.| title = The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) Fauna| journal = Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics| volume = 10| pages = 327–349| year = 1979| doi = 10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001551}}</ref> The group is closely related to, and very similar to, the modern Priapulids.<ref name='Por1983'>{{Cite journal| first1 = F. D.| title = Class Seticoronaria and Phylogeny of the Phylum Priapulida| journal = Zoologica Scripta| last1 = Por| volume = 12| issue = 4| pages = 267–272| year = 1983| doi = 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1983.tb00510.x }}</ref> It is unclear whether it is mono- or polyphyletic.<ref name=Wills1998>{{Cite journal| first = M. A. | title = Cambrian and Recent Disparity: the Picture from Priapulids | journal = Paleobiology | volume = 24 | issue = 2| last = Wills | pages = 155–286 | date = 1 April 1998 | jstor = 2401237}}</ref> Despite a remarkable morphological similarity to their modern cousins,<ref name="doi10.1080/00241160410005088"/> they fall outside of the priapulid ], which is not unambiguously represented in the fossil record until the Carboniferous.<ref name=Budd2000>{{cite journal |last1=Budd |first1=G. E. |last2=Jensen |first2=S. |year=2000 |title=A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla |volume=75 |issue=2 |pages=253–95 |journal=Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society |doi=10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00046.x |pmid=10881389}}</ref> They are probably closely related or paraphyletic to the ]s; the relationship between these basal worms is somewhat unresolved.<ref name=Wills1998/>


==Species== ==Species==
Line 53: Line 53:
*** '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small> *** '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small>
*** ''Sicyophorus sp.''<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1007/s11434-014-0419-y| title = A Chengjiang-type fossil assemblage from the Hongjingshao Formation (Cambrian Stage 3) at Chenggong, Kunming, Yunnan| journal = Chinese Science Bulletin| volume = 59| issue = 25| pages = 3169| year = 2014| last1 = Zeng | first1 = H. | last2 = Zhao | first2 = F. | last3 = Yin | first3 = Z. | last4 = Li | first4 = G. | last5 = Zhu | first5 = M. }}</ref> *** ''Sicyophorus sp.''<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1007/s11434-014-0419-y| title = A Chengjiang-type fossil assemblage from the Hongjingshao Formation (Cambrian Stage 3) at Chenggong, Kunming, Yunnan| journal = Chinese Science Bulletin| volume = 59| issue = 25| pages = 3169| year = 2014| last1 = Zeng | first1 = H. | last2 = Zhao | first2 = F. | last3 = Yin | first3 = Z. | last4 = Li | first4 = G. | last5 = Zhu | first5 = M. }}</ref>
** Genus '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small><ref> (Chengjiang deposits){{cite journal|pages=691–694 |issn=0883-1351 |year=2007 |format= |url=http://intl-palaios.geoscienceworld.org/content/22/6/691.full |journal=PALAIOS |title=EVIDENCE OF PRIAPULID SCAVENGING FROM THE EARLY CAMBRIAN CHENGJIANG DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN CHINA |volume=22 |issue=6 |doi=10.2110/palo.2006.p06-117r |last1=Han |last2=Zhang |last3=Liu |last4=Shu |first1=J. |first2=Z. |first3=J. |first4=D. }}{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> ** Genus '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small><ref>(Chengjiang deposits){{cite journal|pages=691–694 |issn=0883-1351 |year=2007 |format= |url=http://intl-palaios.geoscienceworld.org/content/22/6/691.full |journal=PALAIOS |title=EVIDENCE OF PRIAPULID SCAVENGING FROM THE EARLY CAMBRIAN CHENGJIANG DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN CHINA |volume=22 |issue=6 |doi=10.2110/palo.2006.p06-117r |last1=Han |last2=Zhang |last3=Liu |last4=Shu |first1=J. |first2=Z. |first3=J. |first4=D. }}{{dead link|date=July 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
*** '']'' <small>(Luo & Hu 1999) Luo & Hu 1999</small> *** '']'' <small>(Luo & Hu 1999) Luo & Hu 1999</small>
* Family ] <small>Conway Morris 1977</small> (stem ])<ref name=Haaramo></ref> * Family ] <small>Conway Morris 1977</small> (stem ])<ref name=Haaramo />
** Genus '']'' <small>Walcott 1911</small> ** Genus '']'' <small>Walcott 1911</small>
*** '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small> (Chengjiang deposits) *** '']'' <small>Luo & Hu 1999</small> (Chengjiang deposits)
Line 62: Line 62:
*** '']'' <small>Resser 1939</small> *** '']'' <small>Resser 1939</small>
*** '']'' <small>Conway Morris & Robison 1986</small> *** '']'' <small>Conway Morris & Robison 1986</small>
* Order ] <small>Adrianov & Malakhov 1995</small> (stem ])<ref name=Haaramo></ref> * Order ] <small>Adrianov & Malakhov 1995</small> (stem ])<ref name=Haaramo />
** Family ] <small>Conway Morris 1977</small> ** Family ] <small>Conway Morris 1977</small>
*** Genus '']'' <small>(Walcott 1911) Conway Morris 1977</small> (Burgess Shale) *** Genus '']'' <small>(Walcott 1911) Conway Morris 1977</small> (Burgess Shale)
Line 93: Line 93:
==References== ==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}

{{Taxonbar|from=Q4785523}}


] ]

Revision as of 22:38, 16 June 2019

Class of marine worms

Archaeopriapulida
Temporal range: Cambrian Stage 3–Middle Cambrian PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Reconstruction of the celebrated archaeopriapulid Ottoia
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Stem group: Priapulida (?)
Class: †Archaeopriapulida

Archaeopriapulida is a group of priapulid-like worms known from Cambrian lagerstätte. The group is closely related to, and very similar to, the modern Priapulids. It is unclear whether it is mono- or polyphyletic. Despite a remarkable morphological similarity to their modern cousins, they fall outside of the priapulid crown group, which is not unambiguously represented in the fossil record until the Carboniferous. They are probably closely related or paraphyletic to the palaeoscolecids; the relationship between these basal worms is somewhat unresolved.

Species

References

  1. Smith, M. R.; Harvey, T. H. P.; Butterfield, N. J. (2015). "The macro- and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia". Palaeontology. 58 (4): 705–721. doi:10.1111/pala.12168.
  2. Supplementary information from Smith, M.R.; Harvey, T.H.P.; Butterfield, N.J. (2015). "The macro- and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia". Palaeontology. 58 (4): 705–721. doi:10.1111/pala.12168.
  3. Conway Morris, S. (1979). "The Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) Fauna". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 10: 327–349. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001551.
  4. Por, F. D. (1983). "Class Seticoronaria and Phylogeny of the Phylum Priapulida". Zoologica Scripta. 12 (4): 267–272. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1983.tb00510.x.
  5. ^ Wills, M. A. (1 April 1998). "Cambrian and Recent Disparity: the Picture from Priapulids". Paleobiology. 24 (2): 155–286. JSTOR 2401237.
  6. ^ Huang, D.-Y.; Vannier, J.; Chen, J.-Y. (2004). "Anatomy and lifestyles of Early Cambrian priapulid worms exemplified by Corynetis and Anningvermis from the Maotianshan Shale (SW China)". Lethaia. 37: 21–33. doi:10.1080/00241160410005088.
  7. Budd, G. E.; Jensen, S. (2000). "A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 75 (2): 253–95. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00046.x. PMID 10881389.
  8. Schmidt-Rhaesa, Andreas (2012-12-21). Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera. ISBN 9783110272536.
  9. Liu, Y.; Xiao, S.; Shao, T.; Broce, J.; Zhang, H. (2014). "The oldest known priapulid-like scalidophoran animal and its implications for the early evolution of cycloneuralians and ecdysozoans". Evolution & Development. 16 (3): 155–65. doi:10.1111/ede.12076. PMID 24754444.
  10. ^ Ma, X.; Aldridge, R. J.; Siveter, D. J.; Siveter, D. J.; Hou, X.; Edgecombe, G. D. (2014). "A New Exceptionally Preserved Cambrian Priapulid from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte". Journal of Paleontology. 88 (2): 371. doi:10.1666/13-082.
  11. Hu, S.; Zhu, M.; Steiner, M.; Luo, H.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Q. (2010). "Biodiversity and taphonomy of the Early Cambrian Guanshan biota, eastern Yunnan". Science China Earth Sciences. 53 (12): 1765. doi:10.1007/s11430-010-4086-9.
  12. Han, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Shu, D. (2006). "A new theca-bearing Early Cambrian worm from the Chengjiang Fossil Lagerstätte, China". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 30: 1–10. doi:10.1080/03115510608619340.
  13. Peel, John S. (2017). "Feeding behaviour of a new worm (Priapulida) from the Sirius Passet Lagerstätte (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3) of North Greenland (Laurentia)". Palaeontology. 60 (6): 795–805. doi:10.1111/pala.12316.
  14. Peel, John S; Willman, Sebastian (2018). "The Buen Formation (Cambrian Series 2) biota of North Greenland". Papers in Palaeontology. 4 (3): 381–432. doi:10.1002/spp2.1112.
  15. Huang, D.; Vannier, J.; Chen, J. (2004). "Recent Priapulidae and their Early Cambrian ancestors: Comparisons and evolutionary significance". Geobios. 37 (2): 217. doi:10.1016/j.geobios.2003.04.004.
  16. Han, J.; Shu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. (2004). "The earliest-known ancestors of Recent Priapulomorpha from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte". Chinese Science Bulletin. 49 (17): 1860. doi:10.1007/BF03183414.
  17. Zeng, H.; Zhao, F.; Yin, Z.; Li, G.; Zhu, M. (2014). "A Chengjiang-type fossil assemblage from the Hongjingshao Formation (Cambrian Stage 3) at Chenggong, Kunming, Yunnan". Chinese Science Bulletin. 59 (25): 3169. doi:10.1007/s11434-014-0419-y.
  18. (Chengjiang deposits)Han, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Shu, D. (2007). "EVIDENCE OF PRIAPULID SCAVENGING FROM THE EARLY CAMBRIAN CHENGJIANG DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN CHINA". PALAIOS. 22 (6): 691–694. doi:10.2110/palo.2006.p06-117r. ISSN 0883-1351.
  19. ^ Haaramo, Mikko (2003). "Scalidophora – †palaeoscolecids, priapulids, mud dragons and brush heads". Mikko's Phylogeny Archive. Retrieved May 14, 2019.
  20. Hu, S.; Steiner, M.; Zhu, M.; Luo, H.; Forchielli, A.; Keupp, H.; Zhao, F.; Liu, Q. (2012). "A new priapulid assemblage from the early Cambrian Guanshan fossil Lagerstätte of SW China". Bulletin of Geosciences: 93–106. doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1238.
Taxon identifiers
Archaeopriapulida
Category: