| Revision as of 02:59, 2 January 2005 editLostCluster (talk | contribs)76 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:36, 2 January 2005 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,592 editsm →[]: cmNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Interesting idea, but doesn't work for me. And events listed do seem arbitrary as suggested.] 02:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Interesting idea, but doesn't work for me. And events listed do seem arbitrary as suggested.] 02:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Interesting, but doesn't quite belong here. ] 02:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Interesting, but doesn't quite belong here. ] 02:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Abstain'''. Not necessarily original research. It's apparently based on an old theory by ] . --] | ] 03:36, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:36, 2 January 2005
Logarithmic timeline of current events
I don't get it. Neutrality 02:12, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, personal essay or original research (since the choice of events to be listed seems arbitrary). Does not illuminate the nature of time or the nature of current events. And is the page is very, very unlikely to be properly maintained. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:23, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It somehow managed to exist since March 2004 and be edited by lots of people. It seems very interesting, but I still haven't fully decided whether it's encyclopedic. Vacuum c 02:26, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Interesting idea, but doesn't work for me. And events listed do seem arbitrary as suggested.Sc147 02:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Interesting, but doesn't quite belong here. LostCluster 02:59, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Abstain. Not necessarily original research. It's apparently based on an old theory by Heinz von Foerster . --Viriditas | Talk 03:36, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)