Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:48, 26 July 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One America News Network article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Conservatism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One America News Network article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

No page found for "KlowdTX" or "Klowd TV" although broken link exists on this page (OANN). I believe it should exist under Category of Broadband TV. 168.244.4.61 (talk) 16:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

I have removed the mention, as the reference was KlowdTV's website. Misplaced Pages isn't a directory for non-notable commercial services. If a reliable, independent source exists, this could be restored with that as context. Grayfell (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Request edit on 13 May 2019

{{"The channel has also been noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories." The first citation links to a page that does not support this claim in any way.}}

_{(The above requested edit was made by clicking on a link in an automatically added notice.)}— Preceding unsigned comment added by Murandin (talk • contribs)

Well, it does state: Jack Posobiec, an on-air reporter for the conservative channel One America News Network, which often promotes conspiracy theories.... O3000 (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

@Murandin: pardon? Quoting, "Jack Posobiec, an on-air reporter for the conservative channel One America News Network, which often promotes conspiracy theories". We know that it is talking about the network, as it uses a "which" as opposed to a "who", the latter of which would have been used if the description was being attached to Posobiec.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

That is stated in the article, but there is no support given for that statement. It is only given as an off-hand comment, which is itself inappropriate in the context of the article as the story on which OANN reported was correct in this case. Murandin (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

@Murandin: right. That the One America News reporter (Jack Posobiec) was correct in reporting on a story does not change the description (quoted above) the article attaches to One America News. More importantly, please note that Misplaced Pages is built upon sources considered to be reliable; Vanity Fair is one of these reliable sources, as we can assume its editorial staff and writers do their due diligence. Should you think the article is lacking, the exchequer is on you to bring the matter before the reliable sources noticeboard and have the article in question declared to be unreliable. You can also contact the author or Vanity Fair and ask them to retract the article. Pending one of these actions being undertaken, the source is considered reliable per policy. SamHolt6 (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Can someone add archiving?

There are four-year old discussions on the page. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

 Done Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:51, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Pro-Trump

The statement that OAN is "pro-Trump" is not appropriate in the lede (or arguably anywhere in the article). Does the article about MSNBC describe the network as "pro-Obama" or "pro-Hillary Clinton"? This language should be removed. -BattleshipGray (talk) 03:38, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

@BattleshipGray: Do reliable sources claim this about MSNBC? PeterTheFourth (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

PeterTheFourth (talk): Did you see MSNBC's coverage of the 2016 election, with Rachel Meadow crying as she stated how shocking and horrible it was that Hillary was losing, and then lost, the election? Yes, of course, reliable sources claim MSNBC is left-wing and pro-Hillary Clinton and pro-Obama. -BattleshipGray (talk) 03:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Start-Class television articles
• Low-importance television articles
• WikiProject Television articles
• Start-Class California articles
• Low-importance California articles
• WikiProject California articles
• Start-Class Conservatism articles
• Mid-importance Conservatism articles
• WikiProject Conservatism articles