Revision as of 04:17, 18 August 2019 editDaveler16 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,304 edits →Contradicts itself← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:20, 18 August 2019 edit undoDaveler16 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,304 edits →Links: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
It could be more clearly stated, yes, but there's not a contradiction that I see. The concept originated with Tien Tai, Nichiren expounded on it and put his own stamp on it, and "the philosophy of life" is based on what Nichiren said about ti. So both are true. Does that make sense?--] (]) 04:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC) | It could be more clearly stated, yes, but there's not a contradiction that I see. The concept originated with Tien Tai, Nichiren expounded on it and put his own stamp on it, and "the philosophy of life" is based on what Nichiren said about ti. So both are true. Does that make sense?--] (]) 04:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
== Links == | |||
Not sure we want to include new links to pages that are being evaluated for their validity. The pages related to Nichiren Shoshu and Taisekiji are largely unsourced "original research"; or the citations are to the subject's own websites - both violations of WP policy. --] (]) 04:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:20, 18 August 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soka Gakkai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 40 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soka Gakkai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 40 days |
Flag
The flag shown is the wrong flag. This: Sanshokuki2 Is the proper flag. I can't make the edit because it locked
Corrections
Changed the title of "Practices" back to "Practices", and added a clarifying opening sentence. Also, changed the first sentence in the "Gohonzon" section to match what the attributed source (Seager) actually says.--Daveler16 (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Also changed the caption of the Gohonzon picture so that it is relevant to the Soka Gakkai article, rather than impposing the views of another sect on the Soka Gakkai.--Daveler16 (talk) 21:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Removed a "timeline" that had no referenced source, and replaced it with a source that had previously been removed and replaced by said timeline. And while it is fair to note that the Soka Gakkai still has websites that are critical of Nichiren Shoshu, wording changed to reflect that those websites were constructed many years ago. Citation remains.--Daveler16 (talk) 16:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Made a number of changes correcting grammar and relevance, as well as removing some statements not supported by the cited references.--Daveler16 (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
There is now a list of performance groups, but no citations. Can that be corrected please?--Daveler16 (talk) 22:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Removed more statements in the "Former Relations..." section that had no, or faulty, references and so constituted Original Research.--Daveler16 (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Public Perseption
I added a few sentences about the reality of Japanese journalism which is not comparable to journalism in the West.Ltdan43 (talk) 22:33, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Made some corrections
Wow, there are a lot of things with no source, or wrongly quoted sources. Changed some in Gohonzon, "Faith Practice and Study", and Chanting.--JackBNimble43 (talk) 22:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Contradicts itself
The article contradicts itself:
T’ien-t’ai (538–597), Chinese Buddhist scholar who upheld the Lotus Sutra, developed a theoretical system to describe the infinite interconnectedness of life translated as "the principle of the mutually inclusive relationship of a single moment of life and all phenomena" or "three thousand realms in a single moment of life" (Japanese: ichinen sanzen).
Then underneath this it has
The "philosophy of life" restates principles formulated by Nichiren: "three thousand conditions in a single moment" (ichinen sanzen), and "observing one's own mind" (kanjin)
Which of these formulated the principles? PeepleLikeYou (talk) 11:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
It could be more clearly stated, yes, but there's not a contradiction that I see. The concept originated with Tien Tai, Nichiren expounded on it and put his own stamp on it, and "the philosophy of life" is based on what Nichiren said about ti. So both are true. Does that make sense?--Daveler16 (talk) 04:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Links
Not sure we want to include new links to pages that are being evaluated for their validity. The pages related to Nichiren Shoshu and Taisekiji are largely unsourced "original research"; or the citations are to the subject's own websites - both violations of WP policy. --Daveler16 (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Buddhism articles
- Mid-importance Buddhism articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- C-Class New religious movements articles
- Top-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- C-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- High-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics