| Revision as of 14:51, 26 February 2019 editZiaLater (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users14,564 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 22 August 2019 edit undoRed Rock Canyon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,334 edits →Notifying you of discretionary sanctions in effect for articles related to American politics: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 156: | Line 156: | ||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | ||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ----] (]) 14:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC) | If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ----] (]) 14:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == Notifying you of discretionary sanctions in effect for articles related to American politics == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| }} ] (]) 13:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC){{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
Revision as of 13:15, 22 August 2019
|
Username change
I noticed your question at Alison's talk page, and I understand she's fairly bogged down these days. This request can be made at WP:CHU for a faster response. Hope that helps, –xenocidic (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Juliusz Bogdan Deczkowski
The article Juliusz Bogdan Deczkowski was created a little while ago on the English Misplaced Pages as a somewhat incomprehensible stub. I've touched it up a bit, but all sources are in Polish and we'll need a speaker of that language to get any further with it. I found your name at the Local Embassy, and am wondering if you know of anyone who might be interested in touching up the enwiki version of this article so that it might meet the standard of the version on Polish Misplaced Pages. Thanks! Mr. IP 《Defender of Open Editing》 17:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Blossom Goodchild
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Blossom Goodchild. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Blossom Goodchild (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Possessive
Jobs' is not incorrect, and neither is Jobs's. The decision on the Steve Jobs article was to go with the more widely recommended version for one-syllable names ending in s. Dicklyon (talk) 01:33, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, BeŻet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, BeŻet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror
Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. --18:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
1RR vio
You'd do well to self revert, as you've broke the WP:ARBPIA "original author" 1RR restriction with original authorship and revert. Furthermore, using the highly partisan and unreliable Palestine Chronicle (and reprints) for statements in Misplaced Pages's voice is not acceptable. There is no photo evidence for "settlers storming" or for a "flood". There are photos showing a puddle. Per AP - this is apparently from a nearby Israeli settlement.
and The sewage flowed downhill toward Khan al-Ahmar earlier this week, and on Friday was still pooled in a ravine by the West Bank community’s corrugated tin shacks.
. AP. Kindly self revert. Icewhiz (talk) 14:34, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- I've quite clearly pointed out your 1RR violation above - you were the sole author of this paragraph - on 2 October. It was removed today for the first time - 13:36, 9 October 2018, and it was restored 14:20, 9 October 2018 less than an hour later. This is a clear and outright violation of WP:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction
If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours of the first revert made to their edit
- no other editor edited or reverted the sewage content between 2 October and 9 October. Icewhiz (talk) 14:50, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, BeŻet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Getting Tajemnica Statuetki to GA
Hi, my name is Jarod (Coin945) and my focus at Misplaced Pages is on improving articles on obscure video gaming topics. I became fascinated by the Eastern European history of gaming in the early 90s, and worked really hard on Tajemnica Statuetki. As I am unable to speak Polish there are limitations to my work so I was wondering if you'd be willing to head over to the article and copyedit my work? Otherwise would you be able to refer me to anyone who would?
Best regards, Coin945--Coin945 (talk) 14:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
2019 Venezuelan protests
Hi. I was wondering if we could continue the discussion in the protests article. Regards, --Jamez42 (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
2019 shipping of humanitarian aid to Venezuela
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2019 shipping of humanitarian aid to Venezuela; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ----ZiaLater (talk) 14:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Notifying you of discretionary sanctions in effect for articles related to American politics
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Red Rock Canyon (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Template:Z33