| Revision as of 02:19, 21 December 2004 editJerryseinfeld (talk | contribs)13,086 edits →External links← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:05, 25 December 2004 edit undoTregoweth (talk | contribs)48,975 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''De Beers''' is a ] and ] based ] ] ]. It has historically held a near total ] in the ] trade. However, recently ] interests have captured 20% of the market. De Beers had been for many years under indictment in the ] for ] violations. On |
The '''De Beers Group''' is a ] and ] based ] ] ]. It has historically held a near total ] in the ] trade. However, recently ] interests have captured 20% of the market. De Beers had been for many years under indictment in the ] for ] violations. On ], ], De Beers pled guilty to the charges and paid a $10m fine. The plea enables De Beers to trade in the United States diamond market directly after years of acting through intermediaries. The US diamond market is the largest in the world; in 2000 estimated retail sales of diamond jewelry, which includes the precious metals in the jewelery, totaled US$56 billion worldwide. Diamonds increase in value as they are processed; thus, the value of diamonds in the supply pipeline are, for 2003 (in US$ billion): rough diamond production--$9.4 bn; polished diamonds ex-production--$14.9 bn; polished diamond content in retail sales--$15.8 bn; retail sales of diamond jewelry (including precious metal content)--$60 bn. | ||
| De Beers has used its monopoly to create an artificial scarcity of diamonds, thus keeping prices high. The modern tradition of diamonds as a part of ] in many cultures has been largely created by De Beers through an amazingly effective advertising campaign started in 1939. The 'A Diamond Is Forever' campaign not only convinced the public that the only suitable gift for engagement is a diamond, but also served to limit the market in used diamonds. | De Beers has used its monopoly to create an artificial scarcity of diamonds, thus keeping prices high. The modern tradition of diamonds as a part of ] in many cultures has been largely created by De Beers through an amazingly effective advertising campaign started in 1939. The 'A Diamond Is Forever' campaign not only convinced the public that the only suitable gift for engagement is a diamond, but also served to limit the market in used diamonds. | ||
| De Beers distributes diamonds to favored customers (called '' |
De Beers distributes diamonds to favored customers (called '']s'') by selecting batches of diamonds themselves and offering them as is. Following the distressing use of diamond revenues by African revolutionaries engaged in diamond smuggling (]s), De Beers now sells only diamonds mined from their own mines, most of which are in ] and ]. They are currently involved in a joint venture which is developing a diamond prospect in ]. | ||
| ==Retail joint venture== | ==Retail joint venture== | ||
| In 2001, De Beers launched a joint venture with ]s company ] in order to establish De Beers as a retail brand. The joint venture, called '''De Beers LV''' has a licence from De Beers SA to use the De Beers brand name in a retail environment. The venture has since opened two stores, one in ] and a second in ]. Following the settling of the United States anti-trust case, De Beers said that it planned to open a store in ]. Before the venture was allowed to begin, the EU competition commission launched an investigation into whether the venture would give De Beers too great a control over the rough diamond market. An initial one month probe determined that a longer investigation was necessary. The Commission eventually allowed the joint venture to go ahead in July 2001. |
In 2001, De Beers launched a joint venture with ]s company ] in order to establish De Beers as a retail brand. The joint venture, called '''De Beers LV''' has a licence from De Beers SA to use the De Beers brand name in a retail environment. The venture has since opened two stores, one in ] and a second in ]. Following the settling of the United States anti-trust case, De Beers said that it planned to open a store in ]. Before the venture was allowed to begin, the EU competition commission launched an investigation into whether the venture would give De Beers too great a control over the rough diamond market. An initial one month probe determined that a longer investigation was necessary. The Commission eventually allowed the joint venture to go ahead in July 2001. | ||
| ==History== | ==History== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
| ===U.S. court case links=== | ===U.S. court case links=== | ||
| * | * | ||
| * |
* | ||
| * | * | ||
| * The Times (London) on recent developments. | * The Times (London) on recent developments. | ||
Revision as of 02:05, 25 December 2004
The De Beers Group is a London and Johannesburg based diamond mining corporation. It has historically held a near total monopoly in the diamond trade. However, recently Israeli interests have captured 20% of the market. De Beers had been for many years under indictment in the United States for antitrust violations. On July 14, 2004, De Beers pled guilty to the charges and paid a $10m fine. The plea enables De Beers to trade in the United States diamond market directly after years of acting through intermediaries. The US diamond market is the largest in the world; in 2000 estimated retail sales of diamond jewelry, which includes the precious metals in the jewelery, totaled US$56 billion worldwide. Diamonds increase in value as they are processed; thus, the value of diamonds in the supply pipeline are, for 2003 (in US$ billion): rough diamond production--$9.4 bn; polished diamonds ex-production--$14.9 bn; polished diamond content in retail sales--$15.8 bn; retail sales of diamond jewelry (including precious metal content)--$60 bn.
De Beers has used its monopoly to create an artificial scarcity of diamonds, thus keeping prices high. The modern tradition of diamonds as a part of engagement in many cultures has been largely created by De Beers through an amazingly effective advertising campaign started in 1939. The 'A Diamond Is Forever' campaign not only convinced the public that the only suitable gift for engagement is a diamond, but also served to limit the market in used diamonds.
De Beers distributes diamonds to favored customers (called sightholders) by selecting batches of diamonds themselves and offering them as is. Following the distressing use of diamond revenues by African revolutionaries engaged in diamond smuggling (blood diamonds), De Beers now sells only diamonds mined from their own mines, most of which are in South Africa and Botswana. They are currently involved in a joint venture which is developing a diamond prospect in Canada.
Retail joint venture
In 2001, De Beers launched a joint venture with luxury goods company LVMH in order to establish De Beers as a retail brand. The joint venture, called De Beers LV has a licence from De Beers SA to use the De Beers brand name in a retail environment. The venture has since opened two stores, one in London and a second in Tokyo. Following the settling of the United States anti-trust case, De Beers said that it planned to open a store in New York. Before the venture was allowed to begin, the EU competition commission launched an investigation into whether the venture would give De Beers too great a control over the rough diamond market. An initial one month probe determined that a longer investigation was necessary. The Commission eventually allowed the joint venture to go ahead in July 2001.
History
De Beers was founded in 1888 by Cecil Rhodes. In the 20th century the major shareholders became the Oppenheimer family. Sir Ernest, his son Harry Oppenheimer and his grandson Nicky Oppenheimer have been chairmen of the company.
See also
External links
- De Beers official homepage
- Official homepage of the De Beers/LMVH retail joint venture
- Yahoo! - De Beers Centenary AG Company Profile
- Yahoo! - De Beers Consolidated Mines Limited Company Profile
U.S. court case links
- De Beers settles (17th July 2004) from BBC News
- De Beers plans to settle (10th July 2004) from The Age
- De Beers plans to settle (10th July 2004) from the Washington Times
- The Times (London) 8 Feb 2004 article on recent developments.
- Mail on Sunday (UK) 20 April 2004 article on history of USA indictment.